"Finally, I suspect that it is by entering that deep place inside us where our secrets are kept that we come perhaps closer than we do anywhere else to the One who, whether we realize it or not, is of all our secrets the most telling and the most precious we have to tell." Frederick Buechner
Friday, December 01, 2006
Bishop Pinocchio
Press Release we probably won't see.
But then I would not be shocked.
***************************************************************************
For Immediate Release
The Anglican Communion Network announced today that the Rev. E. Kaeton has been declared the only woman it can support in upcoming episcopal elections. Forward in Faith (Church of England) had previouisly stated that it could accept the Rev. Ms. Kaeton as a candidate, inspite of the organization's general rejection of any ordination of female candidates.
ACN stated in part, "While we generally hold that women cannot function as sacremental ministers, the Rev. Ms. Kaeton has established that she is more than the equal of any possible male candidate. We consider her a special case that recognizes that very occaisionaly, God does intervene in Orthodox Anglianism."
Both statements were prompted by the statement by the Reverend, in regards to their rejection of a recent innititiave by the Presiding Bishop, "I'm shocked -- shocked I say."
In its statement Forward in Faith noted, "As our North American partners have pointed out, her ability to speak with what Americans, quaintly, refer to as a 'forked tounge' might even qualify her to be bishop of San Jaquin!"
Efforts to reach the diocese of Springfield and Quncy, Illinois for comment were unsuccessful. The report that the bishop of Quincy has been so overcome by Rev. Kaeton's clear and concise falsehood that he is considering offering her the office of Dean of the Cathedral has not been confirmed.
Both statements noted that to actually enter an episcopal election with their support, Rev. Kaeton will be required to re-state her shock in a "binding vow or oath" and then state clearly why that vow is not meaningful.
1 comment:
Comment Code of Conduct
I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of this online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)
I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)
I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)
I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by the Blog Owner and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)
(With thanks to Sojourners)
Oh, my dear, this is so delicious that I am speechless and shocked -- shocked, I say!
ReplyDeleteI'll try to recover myself enough to say something more significant on the morrow. For now, I'm just bounding in delight.
qlbzlyuo [hat-tip to MP] yours --
Lisa