"Dream
Big. Fight Hard."
That was her campaign slogan.
So was this: "Big.
Structural. Change."
And, this: "The Best President Money Can't Buy."
And, this: "Persist."
And, unofficially but probably best known: “I
have a plan for that.”
I
don't think there's a woman in America who voted for Hillary Rodham Clinton who
is the least bit surprised at the way Elizabeth Warren has been treated.
No,
not one of us.
From
the beginning, she’s clearly been one of the most experienced, intelligent,
skilled, energetic/energized/ energizingly competent candidate in the running.
Just as Kamala and Amy were. Just as Hillary was.
And
yet, on Super Tuesday, she didn’t win either of the two New England state
primaries – not even her home state of Massachusetts – and, despite a
remarkably well-organized and much-admired campaign organization, she didn’t win one
state.
Not
even American Samoa.
What
the heck happened, many of us are asking. Well, there was the matter of her
policies being a little too far to the Left for many people. She did stumble
and actually fell a little with the unveiling of her plan for “Medicare for
All”.
|
Warren asking Sanders after the debate if he was calling her a liar on TV |
She did not do well as the “female alternative to Bernie,” mostly because
the “Bernie bros” organized against her, much in the same way Bernie is
complaining that “the establishment” is organizing against him.
Oh, and we also found out, a month after the fact, that Bernie had been told that the Russians were working to help him win the nomination.
Of course, the Russians want him to win the nomination. They believe their Donnie-boy will be able to beat him with one hand tied behind his back because America is not ready for a "Democratic (vs Autocratic) Socialist."
When the press got wind of it and asked him about it, he, of course, came out strong, yelling and punching the air with his finger in his usual way to emphasize and underscore that he didn't want or need Putin's help.
A month later. After he had gotten substantial help. And, as Elizabeth's numbers were starting to tank.
The hypocrisy of politics is breathtaking, isn’t it?
And, didn't she just simply eviscerate Mike Bloomberg in the debates?
My, my, my. I've been dreaming about her in a debate with The Orange Toddler. You know he'd call her Pocohantas and she would open up a #17 Can of Whoop-ass right on national television.
However, at
the end of the day, none of the people of color and not one of the women who
ran such stellar campaigns will be in the final running as the candidate for
the Democrats. It will be two old White
guys – only one of whom is a Democrat – trying to oust another old White guy –
a former Democrat – from the Oval Office.
The heart-breaking disappointment with Elizabeth Warren’s
campaign – and all the other women running for POTUS – reminds me of the
various elections for the episcopacy in The Episcopal Church when women were
first in the running.
Mary
Chotard Doll was the first woman to put her name in the episcopal election
process in Washington, DC. She came by leadership naturally but she was also
the daughter of the retired bishop of the Diocese of Maryland, Harry Lee Doll.
More importantly, her mother was Delia Doll, a giant of lay leadership in the
church in her own right.
Cho was excoriated in that election process. That was 1986, a
few months before I was ordained. The ordination of women had been regularized for
10 years, which was considered an acceptable amount of time to have been a
priest before aspiring to the episcopacy.
It
was awful to watch. Through it all, Cho was calm, gracious and articulate. I
don’t remember the questions she was asked – which, of course, none of the men
were asked- but I remember every last one of them being cringe-worthy.
It
wasn't much better, two years later in 1988, when Barbara Harris and Denise
Haynes were in the running for bishop suffragan of the Diocese of Massachusetts.
Both women were enormously qualified as leaders, although Barbara had only been
ordained 8 years and had never been a rector.
|
Jane Holmes Dixon |
I
remember watching Ed Rodman, who was leading the Black Caucus, walking across
the convention floor to talk with Mary Glasspool, who was leading the Women’s
Caucus, and I thought, “Well, I guess we know who will win this election.”
It
was understood that one woman had to take the 'hit' for the other. That turned
out to be Denise. I cried with joy for Barbara but wept for Denise.
I
could hear my grandmother saying, “Oh, the things we do for Jesus!”
And, there was Jane Holmes Dixon, the second woman elected to
the episcopacy as bishop suffragan of DC in 1992, 4 years after Cho's painful
defeat. The rhetoric around her campaign was hateful and awful. Indeed, the
rector of one Anglo-Catholic church in DC sat in the back pew, reading the
Sunday edition of the Washington Post when she came for her first visitation.
No one set up the altar for her.
Then
came Mary Adelia Rosemond McLeod, the first woman to be bishop diocesan (VT)
but she had previously been in no less than 4 elections and had been absolutely
ravaged.
|
Mary A.R. McLeod |
You
will also notice a pattern here: There were two women elected bishop suffragan
before there was a woman elected bishop diocesan. It makes me wonder how many
women will have to prove themselves as VEEP before being seriously considered
capable of being what used to be known, before 2106, as The Leader of the Free
World.
It is awful to see what has happeneded and is still happening
to Elizabeth. And, not too many women in this country are at all surprised.
Sad, but not surprised. At all.
I have no doubt that, before this week is out, Elizabeth Warren - and please, guys (and I mean that in the male sense) - her name is Elizabeth, not Liz. You don't know her well enough to give her a nickname or term of endearment or understand that she doesn't want or need one that will be a diminutive of her full name - will announce that she has "suspended her campaign".
She will undoubtedly be rewarded with a place on the Biden
cabinet. Just as President Obama did with Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Le sigh.
Nevertheless, we persist, especially in dreaming big.
And, fighting hard.
Until we win.
Because, a woman's place is in the House - the White House.
You are so clear about the issues of women being seen as leaders, but I think women are also not supportive to the women around them. We have a long way to go, even though millions of women can march together. Elizabeth Warren is a brave and honest leader. Wherever she may be asked to serve her country, she will rise to the challenge, for she is honest and true--not all about Elizabeth, but how Elizabeth can serve and lead. She has many lessons for us--just as the Elizabeth writer of this blog. Carry on!
ReplyDeleteRobin Sumners
Thank you, Robin.
ReplyDeleteI have been reflecting on your words and there is much truth there. Women are often not supportive of women who are seeking to balance the scales of power. It's the Cinderella-Step Sisters Complex. Or, as my dear friend and colleague, Dana Rose, who now sings with the angels, used to say, it's "Foot-on-Neck" disease - common among oppressed people trying to make their way up the ladder of success. Someone above you has their foot on your neck so you keep your foot on the neck of the person below you. Dana was a gay man and a person of color so I trust the words of his perspective.
No, it doesn't make it right or excuse the behavior. It does help me understand why some women don't support those women who are struggling to take their rightful place in the corridors and rooms of power.
Thanks again for your words. Looking forward to seeing you next year in Charm City.