“When
they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted.”
A Sermon for Trinity Sunday
Live broadcast at Sirach 26:10 on Facebook
June 7, 2020
This
is a sermon about doubt, which, I think, is exactly what this particular
Trinity Sunday, at this particular moment in our lives, is about. Doubt.
Over
the years I have landed in different places about the Doctrine of The Trinity.
I’ve been apathetic. I mean, I’ve thought, seriously, at the end of the day,
what does The Trinity matter? Except to the theologians?
At
other times, I’ve been heretical, scoffing at those who insist that the only
possible answer is that it is a “deep mystery”. Why can’t the Trinity be as St.
Francis explained it, using the three-leaf shamrock to explain that while each
of the leaves were separate they were all part of one shamrock?
That
certainly sat well on the ears of the Irish for whom the Trinity Knot or
triquetra was used to symbolic and honor the Mother, Maiden, and Crone of the
neo-pagan triple goddess. But, the good Fathers of the church said that was a
heresy known as “Partialism” or "Sabellianism". The Trinity, they said, is not about three distinctive
persons of he Godhead but are different parts OF God, each composing 1/3 of the
divine.
The
Church Fathers also struck down Modalism (The Trinity was like the three
different states of water: liquid, ice, and vapor), and Arianism (The sun is a
star, light and heat – not creations of themselves but creatures of the star).
The only acceptable answer for the institutional church is that The Trinity is such a deep mystery that it
is a matter of faith.
And,
if you don’t have faith, you obviously are not a true believer, for a true
believer does not have doubt but, well, believes.
Which means, of course,
believing what you are told, even if it doesn’t make a lick of sense.
I’ve
been thinking a lot about this idea of “the faith first received from thefathers”, about the absolutism of it, and how that sort of line-in-the-sand, my-way-or-the-highway
kind of thinking infects so much of our lives.
I don’t know if it creates
tribalism or is a product of tribalism but of one thing I’m certain: It doesn’t
have much to do with God.
So,
here’s my heresy about the Trinity.
I’m quite sure I don’t know what it is but I am certain of the message. The idea of Trinity is all about relationships. The notion of The Trinity is a pathway into a relationship with God by being in relationship with others.
Now,
that’s not my heresy. I didn’t think that up by myself. There’s a brilliant
theologian and Episcopal priest named Marilyn McCord Adams who wrote about it
extensively. In her work as a theologian, she did not try to answer the question, ‘Why did God permit all
the evils that we know about?’ Rather she asked, ‘What can God do to make our
existence a great good to us, without trivializing the horrendous evils that we
know about?’
Which
lead her directly into the middle of the middle of the mystery of the Trinity
as a model for a relationship with God as a relationship we have with each
other in community.
Or, as theologian Carter Heyward once wrote, our most
intimate relationships are a reflection of our relationship WITH God, AND, our
relationship with God is reflected IN our most intimate relationships with
others.
This
is why, when I have a couple in for marital counseling and they tell me that
their marriage is in trouble, one of the first questions I ask is, “So, how’s
your prayer life?”
Ninety-percent of the time, I get a blank stare followed by
a quizzical look. What makes sense to me is that if you are not in regular
communication with God, why would you be surprised that your communication with
your life partner is suffering? And, vise versa.
So,
now I’ve probably thoroughly confused at least some of you, I hope I’ve
established my credentials as a bone fide heretic. Let me just say that I said
all of that to say this:
As
I anticipated watching the 12th consecutive night of protests and
demonstrations, I’ve been thinking a lot about the words “us” and “we” – the
pronouns of the first person plural – and “our”.
I’ve been thinking about the
violent deaths of the most recent Trinity of Deaths of Black People Ahmaud Arbery, Breonna Taylor and George Floyd – especially
in this time of isolation required by the COVID pandemic.
And,
I’ve been thinking about Christian Cooper, the Black man, a Harvard Graduate, who was out bird watching,
who asked a White woman named Amy Cooper (no relation) to put her dog on a
leash. In response, the woman said she would tell the police that “an
African-American man is threatening my life” before dialing 911.
She was
actually quite maliciously brilliant. She knew exactly how to deal with an
uppity Black man, telling her what to do with her dog, by using her assumed,
unexamined privilege as a white person.
I’ve
been questioning my own spiritual triquetra, the internal mysterious trinity of
my soul. It’s been really hard work to question my “we,” my “us,” and the
privilege and assumptions that are in those tiny two-letter words that
encompass so much and assume so much more.
Especially
in racial terms, I’m thinking about what it means, just for starters, for me to
inhabit a White body, as opposed to being in a Black body.
I understand that race is not a biological but a social construct – a way to deal with the great diversity of people. Indeed, race, like racial identity can be fluid, especially in this multi-racial culture and society in which we live.
What I don’t understand is the assignment of superiority or inferiority, goodness or evil, intelligence or ignorance, based on the color of one’s skin, or the origin of one’s birth, or the assignment of race.
What I don’t understand is the assignment of superiority or inferiority, goodness or evil, intelligence or ignorance, based on the color of one’s skin, or the origin of one’s birth, or the assignment of race.
And,
I’ve been thinking that that act of distinguishing, that curiosity, that
getting conscious of the “we” – especially in terms of what I’ve been taught or
believe about my relationship with God and the Trinity – is the beginning of
the work, the new but old, old, ancient work, the human race is being called to
do – to try to make the “myth” of “us” into a reality.
We
keep trying to put band-aids on something that is so fundamentally broken, from
inception, that a band-aid is not going to do it.
We have to be brave enough to
reimagine what our lives would look like. We can’t underestimate the entrenched
power of the structures and the systems that we’ve built to move us in a
certain direction, a certain dehumanizing direction.
We have to ask ourselves
in bold ways, what does it mean for us to be community to each other? And if
we’re going to be community, what should our neighborhood look like? How should
our streets function?
So,
I’ve been asking myself how it is I will – we will – emerge after the twin
pandemics of COVID and racism? How will societal structures and institutions
need to be rebuilt in order to gain the public trust?
How will ‘church’ look after there’s a vaccine and we all feel relatively “safe” again, now that we know that once you move from first person singular to first-person plural, “safety” is pretty much just an illusion?
How will ‘church’ look after there’s a vaccine and we all feel relatively “safe” again, now that we know that once you move from first person singular to first-person plural, “safety” is pretty much just an illusion?
If
safety is an illusion, how – if at all – does that change our relationship with
God? And, if our relationship with God has changed, how will that change and
transform our relationship with others?
In
Matthew’s Gospel (28:16-20), we read: The
eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain to which Jesus had directed
them. When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted.”
If
some of the first disciples saw Jesus and still doubted, might we also be
forgiven our doubt? Our uncertainty? Our reservation? Our skepticism?
Especially after the safe, secure world we had once known, is now turned upside
down? Especially since even the church – that bulwark of certainty and security
and unchangeable reliability – seems to have been changed and transformed
completely?
I
will leave you with those questions in hopes you find answers – or, at least,
some comfort – in these last words of Jesus:
And
Jesus came and said to them, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been
given to me. Go therefore and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in
the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them
to obey everything that I have commanded you. And remember, I am with you
always, to the end of the age.”
Amen.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comment Code of Conduct
I will express myself with civility, courtesy, and respect for every member of this online community, especially toward those with whom I disagree—even if I feel disrespected by them. (Romans 12:17-21)
I will express my disagreements with other community members' ideas without insulting, mocking, or slandering them personally. (Matthew 5:22)
I will not exaggerate others' beliefs nor make unfounded prejudicial assumptions based on labels, categories, or stereotypes. I will always extend the benefit of the doubt. (Ephesians 4:29)
I understand that comments reported as abusive are reviewed by the Blog Owner and are subject to removal. Repeat offenders will be blocked from making further comments. (Proverbs 18:7)
(With thanks to Sojourners)