Pentecost XXII - Proper 27 C - Track II
November 10, 2019
St. Luke's Episcopal Church, Seaford, DE
This morning’s gospel passage from Luke is one of those
times when you can almost see Jesus doing a facepalm. If you listen closely
enough, you can almost hear him pray an exasperated prayer to God under his
breath, “Seriously? I have to explain this to them?”
This is the 20th chapter of Luke’s gospel. There
are 24 chapters in Luke’s gospel. Now, in the 4th chapter of Luke’s
gospel, Jesus healed Simon’s mother of fever and before the sunset on that
same day, healed many who were sick. In the 5th chapter, he filled
the empty nets of the fishermen with so much fish the nets were almost
breaking; he also healed a leaper, and cured a paralyzed man who had to be
lowered to him through the tiling in the roof.
And, that’s just in the first five chapters. The miracles go
on and on –feeding five thousand with 2 loaves and five fishes, healing
children with seizures and a woman with an 18-year infirmity, etc., etc. All
this, and yet there’s absolutely no sign of the Sadducees asking Jesus any
questions about any of those miracles.
The first time they come to him, here in the 20th
of 24 chapters, the Sadducees don’t ask him about anything he’s done, not any
of the miracles of healing or, in fact, anything he’s said. Instead, they bring
to him a hypothetical situation thinly disguised as a way to get him to say
something about a theological concern of theirs about resurrection – in which, the
Sadducees, unlike the Pharisees, do not believe.
So, this hypothetical situation is almost comic in its
exaggeration. A woman – who was considered property in ancient Israel, simply a
vehicle through which a man could produce an heir – has lost her husband to
death. Torah says that the man’s brother must then care for her – with, of
course, all the rights and privileges and “other benefits procured unto us by
the same” which was afforded to a man in marriage (wink, wink).
The ancient understanding of the purpose of marriage is to
reproduce, to sire an heir – which is the primary reason why sex was prohibited
outside the bonds of marriage.
It was really all about protecting one’s
property – the woman and any children she bore. The law of Moses was designed
to protect the “investment” of a man’s “property” – especially since the
ancient culture was not kind to widows or any other unmarried woman.
In this scenario, however, the Sadducees carried the point
to the intersection of the sublime and the ridiculous. There were seven. Seven
brothers, all of whom married the same woman. All seven brothers died without
producing an heir. And finally, after seven husbands, the woman finally died
having never produced a child.
The story reminds me of the “tests” we kids used to create
for the priests and nuns of my youth. I grew up Roman Catholic and as kids, we
took endless delight in asking questions that mirrored our sense of what was –
to us – absurd ideas which we were carefully taught. My favorite one was this:
So, Sister, we know that God is all-powerful, right.
Yes, my child, Sister would say, not looking up from her
desk (“custody of the eyes”) or continuing to clean the chalkboard (remember
those?).
So, if God is all-powerful, God can do anything, right,
sister?
Yes, my child, Sister would say.
So, if God is all-powerful and God can do anything, can God
create a rock that he can not lift?
Ha! We thought we were so clever!
We practically squirmed in our seats, waiting to hear Sister stammer and sputter as she was stumped for an answer.
We forgot that Sister had been studying Jesus.
We practically squirmed in our seats, waiting to hear Sister stammer and sputter as she was stumped for an answer.
We forgot that Sister had been studying Jesus.
She would stop what she was doing, look kindly upon our
mischievous souls and say, “Now, that is a wonderful question. Very thoughtful.
Good for you. That shows you are using the old noggin’. So, what do YOU think,
children? Can God create a rock that he can not lift?”
And, just like that, Sister had stolen the glee of our
trickery and turned it into a class in religion. Right there, in the middle of
recess or lunch break. And, the worst of it was that Sister never stopped
smiling kindly. She always seemed to be secretly amused – like she knew the
trick and had gotten ahead of us. I think I hated that smile most of all.
It seems to me that the Sadducees did the same thing with
Jesus. What I find amusing – and, I’m sure it didn’t pass the attention of
Jesus – is the subtext of what the Sadducees were asking. They place their
concern about the resurrection squarely in the midst of what some religious
leaders throughout the centuries have always concerned themselves.
In the exaggerated hypothetical situation of one wife for
seven brothers, what the Sadducees seem most concerned about is not justice,
not peace, not mercy or walking humbly with God. No, they are concerned with
who has the right to claim this woman as his property. And, that, quite
frankly, means, who is first in line to have sex with her in the afterlife.
You see, it’s not just The Episcopal Church that has
consumed many years and many General Convention resolutions about the sex life
of others. There really isn’t anything new under the sun.
Which is why I see Jesus doing a facepalm. Or, maybe that’s
my projection. More likely, he was probably smiling kindly just as Sister did
when we asked her about the omnipotence of God.
What Jesus essentially says to the Sadducees, to use Eugene
Peterson’s translation in The Message, is
“Marriage is a major preoccupation here, but not there. Those who are included in the resurrection of the dead will no longer be concerned with marriage nor, of course, with death. They will have better things to think about, if you can believe it. All ecstasies and intimacies then will be with God.”
All ecstasies and
intimacies then will be with God. What a brilliant way to answer their
question. It’s almost as if Jesus has stolen the glee of any unintended
trickery and turned it into a class in religion. Right then and right there. I
suspect Jesus never stopped smiling kindly. Perhaps he even looked to be
secretly amused – like he knew the trick and had gotten ahead of them.
I don’t think there’s any question you can’t bring to Jesus.
You may not get the answer you want – you may not hear the answer because you
want another answer – but you will always get an answer. Sometimes, the answer
is ‘no’. Sometimes, the answer is ‘wait’.
And, sometimes, sitting with the question – prayerfully and expectantly and
hopefully – will bring you an answer you never expected or anticipated,
something to challenge the comfort of the status quo, something that calls you
to an action you couldn’t have asked for or imagined.
You’ve probably heard the story of the woman, a harried
mother of four very active children, who said, “I used to pray all the time to
God for patience. ‘Give me patience, Lord,’ I would pray. And then,” she said,
“God sent me four children, and I’ve been learning about patience ever since.”
Sometimes, I wonder when we pray for peace, if what we get
is war so that we will really understand and appreciate peace.
This weekend as we remember and honor our Veterans, I hope
when we pray for peace we really mean it. Which means that we are willing to
work to achieve it.
God knows, right now there are enough wars around the globe
to make us cherish peace. There is enough gun violence in this country to have
reduced some of our cities to something akin to war zones. The rise of
Nationalism with its attendant racism, anti-Semitism and intolerance of
immigrants has resulted in acts of violence and cruelty to men, women and
children. Threats of civil war have been heard if election results are not what
some want.
I think it takes observances like this Veteran’s Day
weekend when we remember those who have fought and died or who have fought and
lived through the unimaginable horrors of war, to make us grateful for the men
and women who cherish peace.
We honor them best by working to ensure that peace
will prevail and that we will, as that song goes, “study war no more.”
Jesus tells us that God is the God of the living and the
dead, for all are alive in the sight of God.
Jesuit theologian Pierre Teilhard de Chardin said, "We are not human beings having a spiritual experience. We are spiritual beings having a human experience."
There is great comfort in that mystery.
Jesuit theologian Pierre Teilhard de Chardin said, "We are not human beings having a spiritual experience. We are spiritual beings having a human experience."
There is great comfort in that mystery.
I urge us to live through that mystery that is our faith in
a God who loves us so much that we are giving the gift of free will. And, when
our choices are not the best for us or others and we repent, we are given the
gift of grace to seek forgiveness.
Free will and grace. These are two gifts whose generosity
can’t be measured.
Turns out, God can create a rock that He – or She – can’t
lift. Unless, of course, God wanted to lift up that rock and then God would,
indeed, lift up that rock.
Because, well, God is God.
If God can do that, God can also allow us the freedom to fall short of the mark and still provide us with the means, through grace, to lift ourselves up and try again.
Because, well, God is God.
If God can do that, God can also allow us the freedom to fall short of the mark and still provide us with the means, through grace, to lift ourselves up and try again.
I find great hope and take comfort in that mystery. Because
that means that nothing I can do will ever separate me from the love of God in
Christ Jesus. Not even me.
And, because I believe in “the forgiveness of sins, the
the resurrection of the dead and life everlasting,” I also believe that All ecstasies and intimacies then will be
with God.
In the words of St. Paul in his second letter to the
Thessalonians,
“Now may our Lord Jesus Christ and God our Creator, who loved us and through grace gave us eternal comfort and good hope, comfort your hearts and strengthen them in every good work and word.”
Amen.
-->
2 comments:
Today's gospel lesson is a very difficult one for me. I know the scholastic answer which you beautifully restated. It sufficed well enough when I was a twenty-something, yet to fall in love, but now as a seventy-something widower, having experienced being profoundly in love with my spouse for more than four decades, the prospect that we will never again meet, or if our spirits chanced to do so, it would be as essentially strangers incapable of and perhaps forgetful of the love we once shared, seems very sad. Presumably one would not sense the loss as the presence of the divine is, by definition, all consuming; yet not having attained that level of spirituality it rather reminds me of the divided last scene in Aida, in which the Egyptian priests are chanting "Hail immenso Phtha" on the upper level, and Aida and Radames, though dying, are expressing their love in the crypt.
I'm so very sorry for your loss. Your grief is palpable. Here's the way I see it - not right or wrong but just my perspective - "All ecstasies and intimacies then will be with God" does not - to me, anyway - preclude the possibility (or, probability) that we will see each other again and remember the love we shared. That's how I interpret it, anyway. Hope that's helpful to you.
Post a Comment