Come in! Come in!

"If you are a dreamer, come in. If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, a Hope-er, a Pray-er, a Magic Bean buyer; if you're a pretender, come sit by my fire. For we have some flax-golden tales to spin. Come in! Come in!" -- Shel Silverstein

Tuesday, February 19, 2008

As for me and my house, we shall drink lots of fluid and wash our hands


This is the Norovirus. Pretty, isn't it? And, pretty awful.

If you or someone you know who is elderly and in frail health or has a compromised immune system due to chronic illness or chemotherapy, please use extra precaution.

You can read all about the Norovirus here, or here.

This is a nasty disease even for a healthy person. That second link is to a study that was done which links the spread of Norovirus to computer keyboards.

Here's some helpful information from the Department of Health in Minnesota. Please do take good care of yourselves.

What is norovirus?

Noroviruses are a group of viruses (previously known as Norwalk-like viruses) that can cause gastroenteritis, an inflammation of the stomach and intestines.

This infection is often mistakenly referred to as the “stomach flu” – it is not related to the flu (influenza), which is a common respiratory illness caused by the influenza virus.

What are the symptoms?

Common symptoms of norovirus infection include vomiting, diarrhea, and stomach cramping. Less common symptoms can include low-grade fever or chills, headache, and muscle aches. Symptoms usually begin 1 or 2 days after ingesting the virus, but may appear as early as 12 hours after exposure. The illness often comes on suddenly. The infected person may feel very sick and vomit often, sometimes without warning, many times a day. Sometimes people infected with norovirus have no symptoms at all, but can still pass the illness to others.

How long does it last?

Most people recover in 1 or 2 days and have no long-term adverse health effects. Sometimes, infected people may experience milder symptoms for a week or more.

How is it spread?

Noroviruses are found in the stool (feces) or vomit of infected people. From there, noroviruses are transferred to food, water, or surfaces by the hands of infected people who have not washed adequately after using the bathroom.

People become infected with norovirus by:

Eating food or drinking liquids contaminated by an infected person.
Eating uncooked shellfish that has been harvested from contaminated waters.
Touching contaminated surfaces or objects and then touching their mouth or eating without washing their hands first.

What should I do if I have symptoms?

Drink plenty of fluids so you don’t become dehydrated.
Wash your hands often.
Contact your health care provider (but remember that antibiotics don’t treat viruses).

How can I prevent norovirus infections?

Wash your hands often!
After using the bathroom
After changing diapers
Before preparing foods
Before eating
Wash your hands more often when someone in your household is sick.
Clean and disinfect surfaces with household bleach immediately after vomiting or diarrheal accidents.
Wash and/or peel fruits and vegetables before eating them.
Steam oysters before eating them.
Avoid preparing food for others while you have symptoms and for at least 3 days after you recover.

Monday, February 18, 2008

BBC News: 'Cross-dressers' in Nigeria Court

BBC News

The trial of 18 men accused of dressing up as women has started in a Sharia court in northern Nigeria.

The men were arrested last year in a hotel room in the city of Bauchi.

Prosecutors read out a letter from New York based Human Rights Watch calling for the court to respect the men's right to "free association".

The men were originally accused of sodomy, which could lead to the death penalty under Sharia, but the charges were reduced.

Prosecutor Yusuf Adamu said HRW was "grossly misinformed" about the case and invited a representative of the organisation to attend the trial.

Under Sharia law a man must dress like a man and woman must dress like a woman 
Prosecutor Yusuf Adamu

The case was adjourned until further notice by the judge.

The HRW letter was sent to the Federal Ministry of Justice in the capital, Abuja, who forwarded it on to the Bauchi state governor.

The letter said the Nigerian government had signed up to two conventions that enshrined the right to free association and freedom from harassment.

"Human Rights Watch is grossly misinformed. This case is not about the right to free association," Mr Yusuf said.

"Under Sharia law a man must dress like a man and woman must dress like a woman."

The 18 are charged with indecent dressing and vagrancy.

When the letter was read out the defendants looked relieved and happy, the BBC's Shehu Saulawa in Bauchi says.

But prosecutors have asked the court to write a response to HRW which could now delay the case.

Ancient customs

In the west, this case has focused attention on Nigerian attitudes to homosexuality, which is illegal in the country.

But the BBC's Alex Last in Nigeria says perhaps it is more a reflection of current attitudes within northern Nigeria to old local customs.

For centuries in Nigeria's Islamic north - where ethnic Hausa culture dominates - there have been men called Dan Daudu - known for dressing as women and speaking in high pitched voices.

They are largely engaged in doing what was considered to be women's' work and could sometimes be hired as entertainers for parties.

Being a Dan Daudu, however, did not necessarily say much about a person's sexual preferences, our correspondent says.

But eight years ago Nigeria's northern states reintroduced some of the harsher penalties of Islamic law which had been removed under colonialism.

It was a response by politicians to a wave of popular discontent in the Islamic north against political corruption and social injustice.

This new tougher Sharia has largely failed to end such problems but there is now, perhaps, more of a willingness to target groups who appear to behave in ways that run counter to today's more puritan practice of Islam, our correspondent says.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/africa/7246935.stm

Published: 2008/02/15 14:20:25 GMT

© BBC MMVIII

Happy Presidents' Day

Sunday, February 17, 2008

How Can These Things Be?

A sermon for II Lent
John 3:1-17 - February 17, 2008
The Episcopal Church of St. Paul, Chatham, NJ
(the Rev’d) Elizabeth Kaeton rector and pastor

I don’t know about you, but I was always taught, “Say what you mean and mean what you say.”

I suspect Nicodemus had similar instruction in his household. Which, I suppose, is the reason my ears are tuned to hear his frustration at the response he gets from Jesus.

You have to know this about the Pharisees. They were one of several groups that made up the Hasidim (“the pious”). The word 'Pharisee' comes from the Hebrew word prushim, meaning ‘separated’ as in ‘set apart for a life of purity’. Depending on the time, the Pharisees were a political party, a social movement, and a school of thought. They happened to be enjoying a period of prosperity and influence in the time of Jesus.

That explains the reason Nicodemus comes to Jesus ‘by night.’ Clearly, he’s taking a risk in coming to see Jesus at all. He doesn’t want to be seen talking to this upstart Rabbi who is breaking all the rules – healing on the Sabbath, eating with sinners, not keeping strict Kosher and even talking about resurrection, something over which the Pharisees disagreed with the Sadducees. It would cost Nicodemus a great deal of political capital if he were to be seen with Jesus.

Nicodemus begins his conversation with high praise, acknowledging Jesus as a Rabbi with a divine vocation. To which Jesus responds, “No one can see the kingdom of God without being born again.”

Say what? How did we get from introductions and pleasantries to talk about being born again?

“How can these things be?” asks a befuddled Nicodemus.

I get it. I ‘m neither a Pharisee nor a Sadducee, and I’m no stranger to subtlety and nuance, but even I get the bewildered mystification expressed by Nicodemus. I want to say, “Look, I came to you in the middle of the night, at no small personal expense. I haven’t even begun to ask my question and you’re talking riddles about ‘The Spirit blows where it will????”

I get where Jesus is coming from, as well. Jesus seems to know that the 'burning question' Nicodemus has come to ask even before he asks it. Not a big guess. It's the hot topic of the day: eternal life and resurrection. Jesus wants to frame the discussion, and he is wise to do so.

Jesus says, “If I have told you about earthly things and you do not believe, how can you believe if I tell you about heavenly things?” Jesus is talking about matters of faith verses matters of reason, and that makes sense. In many ways, faith is not reasonable. It often doesn't make much sense.

In that way, faith is very much like love, which, as St. Paul writes, never fails. Love is even greater than faith or hope. As he writes to the ancient church in Corinth: “These three remain: faith, hope and love, but the greatest of these is love.” (I Corinthians 13:1-13)

Anyone who has ever been in love can tell you that love is unreasonable. Love can change your perception of the world and allow you to believe in possibility. And, it can break your heart with disappointment. Love makes no sense. Anyone who has ever loved knows that love is illogical.

We love our children, but they can drive us to distraction and sometimes despair. And yet, we continue to take the risk of love. By some strange magic, the more you love, the more you are capable of love.

So it is with faith. The more you believe, the more faith you have. Which can have it's plusses and minuses, but that's a topic for another sermon.

But the Sadducees and Pharisees were not about faith or love. They were about purity and laws. And, politics. A deadly combination, to be sure.

In many ways, the current trouble in the church is a mirror reflection of this conversation between Nicodemus and Jesus. The issue is the tension between ‘the law’ vs. ‘the prophets.’

It’s about illusions of safety and the nature of freedom. It’s about the state of Christians to be simultaneously bound by law and freed by grace.

The latest manifestation of this debate is not about sexuality but rather, about ‘open communion’. As I said, it's the 'latest manifestation.' The issue is still the same: Who's in, who's out? Who's worthy, who's not?

I suppose we've gotten bored with sex so we've moved on to see if we push this button about Holy Eucharist, we'll get even more of a reaction.

There are those who say that the canons (or laws) of The Episcopal Church are clear about who is and who is not allowed to receive communion. And, they would be quite right.

Title I, Canon 17 Section 7 says this very plainly: “No un-baptized person shall be eligible to receive Holy Communion in this church.”

Right. You may have noticed that when a person who is new to this congregation comes to the altar rail, I do not ask them for their baptismal certificate before giving them communion. I do not make any assumption about the state of their baptism; rater, I assume that deep in their souls they are hungry enough for the Real Presence of Jesus to boldly walk all the way up here, fall on their knees, and stretch out their hands in anticipation of a foretaste of the heavenly banquet.

There are those in the church who find that appalling. The canons are clear, they say, and as someone who has signed an oath of conformity to the ‘doctrine, and discipline’ of the Episcopal Church, I could be brought up on presentment charges.

And, they would be correct. I could. Baptism is the rite of membership into Christ’s body and the rules of the church are very clear. Some see our baptismal certificate like an American Express Card: membership has its privileges, the Sacrament of Holy Eucharist being chief among them.

There are others who maintain that this is an issue of evangelism, who then regale you with wonderful, marvelous stories about experiences of conversion to Christianity or a deeper transformation to a relationship with Jesus.

Still others will name this as an issue primarily about pastoral care – about tending to the souls of the flock who may have fallen away or been led astray and need the boundless mercy and forgiveness of God as we know it in the unconditional love of the Body and Blood of Jesus.

Right. All of this is right. I find no fault with any of it. And, I maintain that it’s not simply about keeping the rules and the privilege of membership Neither is it just about evangelism and pastoral care.

If you want to know, it’s all here, in this conversation between Nicodemus and Jesus.

Like Jesus, I want to frame the conversation differently. I want to ask some questions. In fact, all I have are questions.

I want to ask about the nature of the sacraments. The Confirmation Class is learning that sacraments are, according to our Catechism, “outward and visible signs of inward and spiritual grace.”

Let’s talk a bit about that grace, shall we?

We know that grace can not be earned and it is certainly not deserved, but can grace be contained? Jesus says, “the Spirit blows where it chooses” If we believe that Gospel Truth, does anyone have the right to contain or direct the Spirit of God?

What then? Are we talking about anarchy? Are there no limits? No boundaries? No rules? Am I suggesting we become 60's 'granola heads' and hug trees, drop a little acid and practice free love? By no means. That is so yesterday.

The sacraments of the church are vehicles of grace, not the grace itself. We have some control over the first, but not the later. The chances of my being brought up on charges for breaking the canons are far less than the possibility that the grace of Holy Communion will allow love to increase and faith to deepen in the heart of all those who partake in that heavenly banquet.

How can this be? Well, I don’t know exactly, but I do know that Jesus is right when he tells us that there is a distinct difference between earthly things and heavenly things. Sacraments are the earthly things of the church. Grace is the heavenly thing of God. There is much we do not understand about earthly things. How much less we understand things that are heavenly – like grace?

Here’ the best argument for 'open communion' and other moments of sacramental grace. It’s hiding in plain view at the end of John’s gospel. Ever wonder what happened to old Nicodemus after that clandestine meeting in the dark of night? Did he go back and say anything to his fellow Pharisees about this Rabbi, Jesus? Did his encounter with the Living God make any difference at all in his life?

Well, here’s a hint about what might have happened. In John’s report of the crucifixion, he makes mention that there was no tomb in which to place the dead body of Jesus.

A man named Joseph of Arimathea, a wealthy Pharisee but a secret disciple of Jesus, donates a tomb which can be sealed so the body of Jesus can not be stolen and those pesky Sadducees can’t use this for political advance of their disbelief in the resurrection.

But wait! Don't miss this! There, in the words of scripture, lies evidence that grace abounds. In Chapter 19, verse 39, we read: “Nicodemus, who had at first come to Jesus by night, also came, bringing a mixture of myrrh and aloes, weighing about a hundred pounds.”

Well, son of a gun! Would you look at that! The prodigal returns! Nicodemus came back.

Why? Was it about ‘getting religion’? What happened to him as he considered everything Jesus said to him in the middle of the night?

You know what I think? I think Nicodemus was 'born again."

I suspect that Love – the kind that is incarnate as well as divine – happened for Nicodemus. It often does when one is in the Real Presence of Jesus. That kind of love is illogical. It is unreasonable. It allows you to deepen your faith. Which allows you to take risks. Which inspires random acts of generosity and kindness like bringing about a hundred pounds of costly myrrh and aloes to properly bury someone who was a stranger to you.

Sacramental grace is like that. What happens at that altar and at that altar rail is transformative. You may not realize this, but people are being 'born again' every Sunday when they receive the Body and Blood of Christ.

If we really believed half of what we said in the Eucharistic Prayer, we would also hand out seat belts and crash helmets with the communion bread and wine. There should be a sign at the foot of the chancel steps, perhaps hanging from the Baptismal Font, which says: “Warning! Transformation at work. You may be born again. Approach at your own risk!”

As we see from this late night encounter with Nicodemus, being in the presence of Jesus can completely and forever change your life.

How do I know those things? Well, I can’t prove it, but I have seen it happen. People come to the altar rail and despite all that is wrong in the church, all that is wrong with her ministers and often her ministry, nothing can either contain or weaken the power of the Spirit.

I know. It’s very confusing isn’t it?

Jesus said, “Do not be astonished that I said to you, ‘You must be born from above. The wind blows where it chooses, and you hear the sound of it, but you do not know where it comes from or where ti goes. So it is with everyone who is born of the Sprit.”

Clearly, there is a time for plain speak – to say what you mean and to mean what you say. Eucharist is a time to allow mystery to enter into that deep place where your spiritual hunger may be fed, you may be nourished to care for others, the way Nicodemus and Joseph of Aramathea cared for Jesus, even in death.

It is a moment in which the past and future fold into the present and you believe with all your heart that that you, like Abram before you, are being blessed so that you may be a blessing. Abram may have had to work in order to be justified, but Jesus promises that we are justified by faith. The Eucharistic moment is when Love comes, that you may have faith and hope – but the greatest of these is Love.

And suddenly, in that moment, you understand that you can mean what you say and say what you mean, and people may not understand you, anyway, but it matters not. It is in that moment that you understand that you have been born again – but this time, from above.

I know. It’s all very confusing. Take heart. Jesus says this: . “If I have told you about earthly things and you do not believe, how can you believe if I tell you about heavenly things?"

Saturday, February 16, 2008

To give or not to give? That is the question.


Over on HOB/D (House of Bishops/Deputies Listserv), there's been a fairly lively discussion of a few days running about Baptism and Holy Eucharist.

There are those who are telling wonderful stories about personal conversion of those who, unbaptized, have been unconditionally welcomed to the Altar who have experienced spiritual transformation and became Christian.

There are also those who call us into compliance with the canons and rubrics of The Church.

The question seems to be framed in terms of baptism-as-rite/right - of membership vs. evangelism and pastoral care.

Here's my response:


I think the outcome of this discussion depends upon the way it is framed. This is not a "Jesus" issue. It's an institutional one. On this and so many issues, we are inextricably caught in the tension between "the law" and "the prophets." By that I mean that as followers of The Christ, we are simultaneously bound by law and freed by grace. It's a very messy place to be.

True to the Body of Christ that we are, we, like him, know what "the law" of the church directs us to do. Of this, there is no doubt. As clergy, we are duty bound by canon and rubric, to follow them. I'm glad to say that, even among my sharpest adversaries, no one I know on this list would ask for the baptismal certificate of anyone at the altar rail as a condition for receiving the Body and Blood of Jesus.

Just for the record, I do believe that once a clergy person is aware that an 'un-baptized' person has been presenting herself to receive Eucharist, s/he is required to have a conversation with that person. I will concede that this is as much about obedience to the doctrine and discipline of The Church as much as it is an opportunity for pastoral care and evangelism.

But, this is not just a question of canons or baptism-as-a-right-of membership, or evangelism or pastoral care. That's one way to frame the question which will lead us down a path where the final destination is certain.

This is about the two Great Sacraments of the church. And, sacraments, our Catechism teaches us, are always about "an outward and visible sign of inward and spiritual grace."

So, some of the questions I'm asking myself are these:

What about 'inward and spiritual grace'? We know that grace can not be earned and it is certainly not deserved, but can grace be contained? Jesus says in this Sunday's gospel, "the Spirit blows where it will." If we believe that Gospel Truth, who has the right to contain the Spirit of God and direct it him/her)?

If we rely on the Spirit, are we 'casting our seed on stony ground' or do we believe that 'God can raise up from these stones' sons and daughters of Abraham and Sarah who can claim their inheritance promised by Jesus?

Do we first feed those who are spiritually hungry and then worry about membership, or do we ask that they get washed up and wear proper clothing before they are allowed a place at The Table of the Lord?

If we 'allow' communion once or twice before explaining the 'house rules' when and how will we know that someone is now 'ready' to receive the Lord? (Highly recommended before answering this question: Read or watch 'Cider House Rules')

What are the criteria? Do they have the same application across the board for everyone or just new members?

Okay, so we have "The Exhortation" as found on page 316 of the Book of Common Prayer. If we're going to insist on baptism before Eucharist, should not The Exhortation be read instead of or before the Offertory Sentence?

Should there be a list of criteria that all have to follow - every time, before anyone comes to the altar rail - if Eucharist is going to be . . . 'authentic' or 'valid' or 'institutionally correct' . . . so that everyone will 'feel at home'? (Am I beginning to sound like one of the Five Petulant Primates?)

Ultimately, isn't it a matter of a personal call of the priest? Should it be?

Do we have it as Jesus would have it: first the font and then the altar, or do we have the order in reverse? If we use scripture as our guide which will lead us to the truth, how do you read? What did Jesus do or teach regarding the institutional requirements of his day for, say, healing on the Sabbath? What does Jesus have to teach us about 'selecting' those who come to him? What does 'suffer not the little children to come to me' mean to us today?

We are all called to continual personal transformation, Is not the institutional church called to that same transformation or is she to remain a safe little Museum of Doctrine, Canon and Liturgical Arts? Is the psalmist correct and God is doing a new thing, or are we locked tightly and securely away behind the red doors The Church?

Framing the discussion with these questions will most certainly not lead to predictable behavior. Some may fear it will lead to anarchy. I am reminded that whenever an angel appeared before anyone who was being asked to do something unconventional and take a risk for God, the first words spoken were, "Fear not."

Personally? I think the current practice is exactly what Jesus did - would do. It's both/and, not either/or. The institutional church will do what she has always done. Her first impulse is always to preserve and conserve. That's fairly predictable behavior for any institution, but especially so in the Church.

Jesus, on the other hand, always calls us beyond predictable behavior - especially the behavior of religious institutions. Had we not taken the risk and followed his call and the movement of the Spirit, we would still not allow ordination as a church of 'unsuitable matter' of women and people of color.

I suspect one day we'll look back on this discussion, like the discussions about institutional racism and sexism,as well as heterosexism and homophobia, and be ashamed of ourselves in front of our grandchildren.

What, then? Are we to change the canon of the church regarding Baptism and Eucharist? I'm not as concerned, in this particular matter, about changing canon as I am changing hearts and opening minds.

And that is exactly where sacramental grace and the Spirit reign supreme.

I mean, after all, it is 2008


Remain Episcopal to host baptism, female priest
BY LOUIS MEDINA,
Californian staff writer
The Bakersfield Californian
e-mail: lmedina@bakersfield.com
Friday, Feb 15 2008 9:10 PM

Last Updated: Friday, Feb 15 2008 9:12 PM

Two newsmaking events are scheduled to take place Sunday at the local gathering of Remain Episcopal, the faith community of believers opposed to the San Joaquin Diocese's recent split from the Episcopal Church over doctrinal differences.

During the first part of the worship, the Rev. Tim Vivian, an ordained Episcopal priest and a professor at Cal State Bakersfield, will perform a baptism -- his first since recently having been appointed as temporary missionary priest to the local community by an emissary of the church's presiding bishop, the Most Rev. Katharine Jefferts Schori.

Later, a visiting female priest from Los Angeles will celebrate Communion toward the end of the Mass.

"In this diocese that IS a big deal," Vivian wrote to The Californian in an e-mail.

The Rev. Elizabeth Davenport, of St. John's Episcopal Church, who has also been the senior associate dean of religious life at USC for the last five years, said the San Joaquin Diocese under seceding bishop the Rt. Rev. John-David Schofield did not allow women priests, including visiting priests, to celebrate Communion.

But because Schofield's duties are currently constrained or "inhibited" by Jefferts Schori during a 60-day waiting period before a possible ecclesiastical trial, the Episcopal remnant within the local diocese is at liberty to employ the services of female priests, whom Jefferts Schori supports.

Sunday's Mass will take place at 10 a.m., at the chapel of First Congregational Church on Real Road and Stockdale Highway, which is allowing Remain Episcopal to use its facilities.

Friday, February 15, 2008

My mother, my self


Well, predictions of my mother’s impending demise have proven highly inaccurate.

Indeed, she is as far now from death’s door as she was close, just a week ago. She is presently in a skilled rehabilitative center not far from her home. Her breathing is easier, her voice sounds stronger, and she is working hard to get herself back to the home she has made with my youngest sister and her family since my father died ten years ago.

She’s a fighter, that one. Beneath that socially pleasant demeanor beats the heart of a stubborn, tough old bird, whose stamina and endurance have been tested by the Great Depression, World War II, the Viet Nam War, the Civil Rights Movement, the Dawn of Feminism, and the advance of the Age of Technology which, quite frankly, has left her happily behind.

She has known cruel abuse at the hands of parents who arrived in this country fresh from their respective peasant villages in Portugal and the Azores, and from a husband whose alcoholism she steadfastly reframes as “Oh, he was headed into a ‘drinking problem, but he wasn’t an alcoholic. Every once in a while he would drink too much, the way all men did in those days. But, he stopped because he was a good, man, a good husband and a good father.”

Her rhetorical flourish can be relied upon to conclude with these words, “He always provided for us.”

My mother lives by the philosophy that if you repeat a story enough times, it becomes truth. It comes as a package deal with being stubborn and tough. It’s how you survive.

She did the same thing with her latest illness. She simply told herself that it wasn’t her time, yet. She had more living to do. More time she wanted to spend with her family. So, she dug her heels in, put on her spiritual armor, grabbed her rosary and took on the fight.

The Congestive Heart Failure, Diabetes, Kidney Function Impairment and Septic Shock came as Four Horses of the Apocalypse to carry her to the other side. She has taken them on all at once and beat them back from death’s door. Watching her is like watching a Jedi knight battle fiercely against Darth Vader with her spiritual laser.

The Force is with her. Or, to hear her tell the story, St. Theresa, the Little Flower of Jesus, who comes to her bed every night as she falls asleep saying her rosary and whispers encouragement and hope in her ears.

Mother and I have never had what could be described an idyllic relationship. You know what? I don’t know who does. Even the wonderful relationship I have with my daughters is far from being perfect.

It’s the nature of the complex “My mother, myself” dynamic of which so many books and articles have been written. I’m convinced that the same is true for fathers and sons – but, perhaps, even more complex. The sooner we embrace this reality of imperfection and let go of the myth of flawlessness the healthier all of our relationships will be.

When I went to see my mother a week ago, it was to say goodbye and to say the things I needed to say to her before she departed this earthly realm. I thought I was going to offer forgiveness. I thought I would help her find true repentance and amendment of life, and in the process, she might find ‘a peaceful death.’

I look back on that now and shake my head at my own arrogance.

Apparently, I hadn’t remembered the lesson I learned from my father’s dying, the decade before. Along with a whole host of medical problems, my father developed senile dementia in the last year of his life. About three days before he died, I went to see him in the skilled nursing facility where he had been transferred, and was delighted to find that he was enjoying a brief period of coherency. As we took a stroll down the long, sterile corridor, I seized the opportunity to say, “Dad, I just want you to know that I forgive you.”

My father stopped dead in his tracks and lifted his head from the careful study he had been making of his shuffling footsteps on the floor to look at me. His eyes twinkled as a smile over took his face. “Really?” he asked, barely concealing his astonishment. I nodded my head yes. “Well,” he said, his eyes dancing in the mischievous way I remembered as a child, “That’s a good thing. Because I forgive you, too.”

We both roared with laughter, and with every shake of our heads and bodies, another awful, dreadful memory was released from our hearts and forgiven and blessed into the cosmos.

I was relating this story to my daughter as we traveled in the car up to Boston to see Mother, She was quiet for a while and then asked, “Then, what do you want to say to her?”

I found myself surrounded by a profound silence before I spoke.

There are a few words I have never heard my mother say to me. I’ve heard her say it to some of her grandchildren, but never to me or any of my sisters or my brother. The first is this, “I love you.” The second is like unto it, “I’m proud of you.”

My youngest sister confirmed this. “Mother has never been emotionally demonstrative,” she once told my daughter who related it to me.

My sister wins the award for The Understatement of the Year.

As I recall just a few of the stories my mother told me about her childhood as one of the 22 children my grandmother birthed (20 pregnancies) and the 19 who made it to adulthood, I suspect she never had those words said to her by her mother.

And, her mother? My grandmother? She was the youngest and only girl of 16. Her mother died when she was 12. What are odds, you figure, of her peasant mother having said those words to her?

It came upon me with a sudden clarity that shook me to my soul: I am going to mother my mother. I am going to tell her the things she did not hear from her mother and never said to her daughter. I am going to break the cycle, officially, of benign emotional neglect which has, nevertheless, done great relational harm.

And, that’s exactly what I did.

At one point, when my daughter left the room to get a cup of coffee, I seized the opportunity to talk with my mother. She was chatting away, moving the egg salad sandwich she had for lunch around her plate.

When she finally came up for air, I said, “You know, Mother,” I began slowly, cautiously, clearing my throat, amazed at how tight it had suddenly become, “I have to tell you that as I consider all that you’ve been through, all that you are today, I must say that I am very proud of you.”

Her head jerked up from her work on her lunch and she looked at me as if I had spoken a foreign language. “What?” she said, “I didn’t hear you.” Then, embarrassed, added, “I really need a hearing aid in this right ear.”

“I’m proud of you, Mother,” I continued. “You know, I write a great deal. I even keep a daily (well, almost) blog where I hone my skill at writing. Whenever I’m asked why I write, I always say because it keeps me sane. I’ve come to realize that this is just half of it.”

“I write, “ I said, “because you stopped.” My mother looked bewildered and asked, “What do you mean?”

“Mother do you remember entering the writing contest they had on the radio? I do. I couldn’t have been more than 8 or 9 years old, but I remember seeing you at the kitchen table, writing furiously on a pad of yellow lined paper. I asked what you were doing and you explained that the radio station had announced that they were having a writing contest and the first prize was $100. You were going to write about something in your childhood and you planned to win. Don’t you remember?”

A smile of recognition crossed my mother’s face. “Why yes, yes I do.”

“You sat at that table and, you didn’t know it, but I stayed up with you, praying feverishly in my bed. I could hear the lead in the pencil as it made soft swirling sounds on the paper.”

“You wrote until well after midnight – a time your own mother had carefully taught you that, after which, ‘nothing good ever happens.’ Well, you did. And, it was good. Good enough to win second place. You won a $25 gift certificate to Robert Hall Clothing Outlet.”

“I remember, clearly two weeks later, when the awards announcement was made and your name was in second place. We were all delirious with happiness and pride. You took that money and bought us all new clothes for Easter Sunday. I remember telling all my friends that my beautiful new dress came from Robert Hall (quite a prestigious name at the time) and was bought with the money you won in a writing contest.”

“Mother,” I croaked through the lump in my throat, “I was never more proud of you then. You had a 9th grade education and you won second place in a writing contest. I was so proud, I think I popped off all the buttons in my blouse at school the next day.”

“Yes, I remember, that well “ my mother said, as tears glistened in her eyes.

“Why did you stop?: I asked. “Why didn’t you write more and enter again?”

“Because,” my mother said, “being in second place in the writing contest wasn’t half as important as being in first place in the eyes of my children,” she said. “It was enough. It was more than I could have ever imagined.”

“Well,” I said, “”I think that’s why I write. Because you can’t. Or, won’t. At any rate, I want you to know that I was very proud of you. I want you to know that, all things considered, and after all you’ve been through, I am very proud of you.”

“Thank you,” my mother whispered hoarsely. “I’m proud of you too.”

I hastened to add, before my daughter returned to the room, “All things considered, and in my own way, I love you, too.”

My mother looked me dead in the eye, in that way that looks past your eyes and into your soul, The way mothers have looked at their daughters for centuries. The way Eve looked into the daughters she must have had but were never mentioned in scripture. The way Anna looked at her daughter, Mary, who became the Mother of God. The way Ruth must have looked at Naomi.

And then, she said it: “All things considered, and in my own way, I love you, too.”

I laughed out loud, just as I had when my father returned my forgiveness of him.

It was good enough for me. It was good enough for all the years of not ever having heard it from her.

Because, you know, what? Until that moment, I wasn’t exactly sure I had ever said those words to her. In fact, I continue to doubt it now.

Sometimes, the process of redemption takes years, but it is always a circular, reciprocal process. By his life, death and resurrection, Jesus taught us that God is redeemed in the redemption of our humanity.

If you’re lucky, you’ll see it while you’re still on this side of Eden. If not, we are assured that we’ll one day know it perfectly, in that ‘great by and by’.

All things considered, and in my own way, I’m glad to know that love imperfectly here and now. And, not just the unconditional love from the lips of God who gave me life, but directly and conditionally from the human heart of the one who gave me birth.

My mother is right. Being first in the heart of your children is more important than almost anything else on earth. And, the second is like unto it: knowing that your mother is as proud of you as you are proud of her.

Even if you can’t say that out loud. And, it takes over fifty years to do so.

My mother. My self.

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

You just can't make this stuff up!

Thus saith the Lord, "I will destroy him that pisseth against the wall" (KJV)

This preacher tells us that "this phrase comes from the mouth of the Lord six times in scripture."

See, for example: 1 Kings 16:11 - "And it came to pass, when he began to reign, as soon as he sat on his throne, that he slew all the house of Baasha: he left him not one that pisseth against a wall, neither of his kinsfolks, nor of his friends."

The preacher concludes: "That's what's wrong with America, my friends. I will not pee sitting down."

(Caution: You might wet yourself laughing when you listen to this, so don't sit down while you read this, or you may be struck dead.)

Well, I guess I'm not invited


Bakersfield News
"Church Split Over Gay Bishop Invites Gays to Church"

"Tuesday night, Bishop John-Davis Scofield from the San Joaquin Diocese told the congregation at St. Lukes that the church has not shut its doors on everyone, just those involved in ministry who don't live according to their interpretation of scripture."

(Here's the real question: Does he sit or stand?)

And the 'Poster of the Day' Award goes to . .


This is British actor John Barrowman who plays character 'Captain Jack' on the British series 'Torchwood'.

He has joined with 'Stonewall' a UK Gay Rights Group in a public ad campaign to fight homophobia.

I think it's brilliant.

Oh, and just in case you didn't know, he's gay.

I know. 'Get over it'.

Unless, of course, you're a gay man, then it's 'Quit your drooling. You'll ruin your computer keyboard that way.'

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

25 Thrilling Years

It's been 25 years since Michael Jackson's 'Thriller' video was released. It's still a classic but I confess, other than the one featuring the Filipino Jail Chorus, and ignoring the 'Lego', 'Wedding' and Football Versions, I like this one best.

I know BYU (Brigham Young University). Go figure

Giggle of the Day Award goes to MadPriest

Click on the picture for a larger, clearer image.

P.S. He means "Sings", I think. The Grand Tufti Sings to Motown. 

I know we're two countries separated by a common language, but let us not be further separated by a common typo.

The First Lenten Sunday Experiment

Readers of this Blog will know about The Great Lenten Experiment going on at St. Paul's in Chatham. If you don't, you can read all about it here.

Basically, we're taking Bishop Mark Beckwith's challenge to look at the quality of our worship life - why we do what we do with prayer, the space, the hymns and psalms, 'our souls and bodies' etc. - and what that says about our relationship with God.

During Lent, we will be looking at the 'transcendence' vs. the 'immanence' of God by 'Facing (Liturgical) East'. In other words, my back will be to the people, and I will be endeavoring to lead them to a deeper awareness of the transcendent nature of God.

To keep with the solemn nature of Lent, we have also moved the Passing of the Peace (which has become like half-time or intermission) to one of its ancient places in the liturgy - right after the Great Amen and before the Lord's Prayer. The Announcements have also been moved to the end of the service - right after the Post Communion Prayer and before the final blessing and recessional hymn.

I wish I had had the presence of mind to ask someone in the choir loft to take pictures. I will next week. Choir members were almost universally in awe of what they experienced. They LOVED it. Most in the congregation, however, did not.

The reactions have been interesting. And, most have been exactly that - reactions as opposed to responses. It was visceral. Deep. "I hate it. HATE it!' one member exclaimed. "I feel cut off from the altar. You are not leading us to God, you are cutting us off from him."

"WOW!" I responded. "What a GREAT reaction! This is FABULOUS! When was the last time you felt that passionate about something that happened in church?"

She looked at me completely befuddled. I suppose I was expected to cower and then grovel as I apologized profusely for having the unmitigated nerve to change something in our worship. So, no fool, I seized the moment.

"You have exceeded my wildest hopes and dreams for this experiment. The whole point is to get you to think about what we're doing and why we do what we do when we worship God, and to consider what that says about our relationship to God."

She walked away, muttering incoherently.

"But, you have spit in the face of tradition," said another, anonymously, of course, in the written survey form I have been circulating for two weeks about this Lenten Experiment. (We'll do another 'post survey' in Easter.)

The ironic thing, of course, is that the tradition of the Church has been to face East. Facing the people is a 'recent innovation' - only with us since Vatican II in the late 60's.

Those who grew up in The Episcopal or Roman Catholic tradition were flooded with memories of their childhood or teen years. There were lots of stories about 'watching Father' as a child from the choir stall, and feeling part of 'some Great Mystery."

Most were cautiously guarded. "I trust you, Elizabeth, in this experiment, but at first blush, I don't like it."

Me? I was too caught up in the mechanics and pragmatics to really weigh in at this point. I didn't like the disruption in the 'expected' flow of the liturgy. The altar space suddenly felt much smaller. It felt really awkward to have my back to the people. It also seemed more . . . 'natural' . . . to face East while using Rite I, as has been our custom at the 8 AM service during Lent.

On the other hand, I have never before felt the power of the moment of the elevation of the consecrated elements as I did as I faced East. I felt a participant in 'the sacrifice of the Mass' in a way I never have before.

Interesting.

We also did The Great Litany, chanted in procession. That's one long sucker, isn't it? In the second week of Lent, we'll begin with the Penitential Order and read the Decalogue. After that, we'll "simply" begin with the Penitential Order, Confession and Absolution and Kyrie and the rest of the service will flow . . . as 'normal'.

I'm glad I prevailed upon the Organist / Choir Director to select old, familiar hymns, including the Doxology (Old 100th) as the Presentation Hymn for the next two weeks. There's got to be some 'anchor of the familiar' for balance.

I'll keep you posted on how this progresses. And, next Sunday, I'll post some pictures.

The Bishop's Annual Visitation is scheduled for March 2nd. I'm sure he'll get an earful.

Please keep us in your prayers.

Monday, February 11, 2008

Vestry Retreat


I'm fresh from Vestry Retreat and have a thought about a Vestry Community Building Project. I'd like to float it by you and get your thoughts and ideas and solicit any resources you might have.

As an 'opening ice breaker' we asked folks to say their birth order, the constellation of their family of origin, and their greatest challenge in that family - as child, teen, and/or adult - which is an operational dynamic in their lives today.

Yes, I'm an unashamed devotee of Ed Friedman's Family Systems approach to congregational life and leadership. I am also an unabashed fan of Walter Wink's approach to Bible Study.

It was fascinating. Of the 12, 8 of my Vestry are first born children. There are three 'middle children' and one 'baby". Seven of us are Adult Children of Alcoholics (mostly mothers, one father) and one is an Alcoholic in good recovery. It's easy, now, to see why most of us are in 'responsibility over-drive' - a good thing, which also serves as a cautionary parable about the potential for 'burn out'.

As we were forming goals for the year, I said that as 'Rabbi' one of my goals is to get them - and the congregation - to think more biblically, and to see how God's revelation is on-going in our lives of faith. Specifically, I'm hoping that more and more of us can identify a scriptural passage which animates our sense of ministry - individually and corporately - to be able to more clearly articulate how their story, our corporate story, is part of the Gospel story.

For example, I said that I read the story of the Canaanite woman in Matthew's gospel (15:21-28) as one that is a source of inspiration and validation. You know the story. This woman tries to get to Jesus for healing for her daughter but the disciples keep shooing her away. She uses her persistence with them and her wit and intelligence with Jesus, inadvertently confronting them all on their sexism and racism. Jesus says to her, "Woman, great is your faith. Let it be done for you as you wish."

I saw lots of heads nodding in recognition around the table. I also allowed as how I often see them as Bible characters, which gives me a perspective of the holiness of their ministry. "Ah, there you are, Peter," I often say, "Come here, you big lug, and let me 'splain some things to you." Or, "Oh, hello, Ruth. Great is your faithfulness." You know. Like that.

They were intrigued by this thought and were immediately curious to know who they were for me. I then suggested that what I thought of them was less important than how they see themselves and each other. I explained that I wanted them to think about everyone with whom they worked on Vestry and come to Vestry meetings prepared to lead our opening meditation in a different way.

Our current practice is to start with 30 minutes of Bible Study before our Vestry meeting. We close that time and open our business session with a meditation or prayer offered by one of the Wardens or Vestry in rotation. I'm suggesting that the 'opening meditation' time be used with one or two of them, in turn, identifying each of the Vestry members in terms of a Bible character, keeping the focus positive, of course.

They were both excited and challenged by this task. After the Retreat ended, more than a few of them came up to me saying, "You know, I confess that really don't know much about the characters in the Bible. Can you give me a list of characters from which I can choose? Is there a book that gives a little synopsis of a character from scripture that will point me in the right direction to the story in the Bible?"

Which leads me to my question to you. Oh, I can do a google search and undoubtedly find some books which do this. I'm wondering if there are any resources you know - even if it's a children's book (which are often much better than adult books - that does this. Sort of a "meet the family of God" Social Register or a Biblical version of the Clerical Directory (what we used to call 'The Stud Book'). It doesn't have to be definitive or exhausting - just a little something to jump-start the process, arouse their curiosity, and send them to the Scriptures for more information.

I am enormously excited by this project. It's creative and helps to accomplish my goal of helping them think more biblically to see how God's revelation is on-going in our lives of faith. I'm hoping that more and more of us can identify a scriptural passage which animates our sense of ministry - individually and corporately - to be able to more clearly articulate how their story, and our corporate story, is part of the Gospel story.

I would be most grateful for any help you can give me in finding a resource that can 'jump start' this process and point them in the right direction. Thanks for your help.

Sunday, February 10, 2008

The Temptation of Scripture


“It is written” (Matthew 4:1 – 11)
I Lent – February 10, 2008
The Episcopal Church of St. Paul, Chatham, NJ
(the Rev’d) Elizabeth Kaeton, rector and pastor

Temptation. It’s an important theme of this morning’s readings from scripture on this, the first Sunday in Lent. We hear it in the first lesson from Genesis, the story of the Temptation in the Garden of Eden, when the first man, Adam, and the first woman, Eve, were tempted to eat of the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge.

We hear it echoed in the Epistle to the Church in Rome. Using the rhetorical style characterized by pristine logic, St. Paul helps us understand that Jesus in the wilderness has redeemed the temptation that Adam could not withstand in the Garden. “For just as by the one man’s disobedience the many were made sinners, so by the one man’s obedience the many will be made righteous.” (Romans 5:12-19).

Matthew’s gospel wants to help us connect the dots from the Garden to the Wilderness. He wants us to be absolutely certain to know that, unlike Adam, Jesus was able to resist not one but three temptations by Satan - and, when he was at his most vulnerable point.

Famished after forty days and forty nights of fasting, Jesus was clearly at his weakest moment. It was then that ‘The Tempter’ appears before Jesus, enticing him to turn stones into bread, to risk his life on the promise that God will save him, and to offer him dominion over all the whole world.

These three temptations are at the very core of the vulnerability of being human: Never to be without basic need. Never to suffer pain. Never to be without possessions. This is even more tempting that a measly apple – even if it was from a ‘magic tree.’ No hunger. No pain. No poverty. Pretty basic, core stuff. Who wouldn’t have been tempted?

It is important to note that this passage, along with its parallel in Luke, is what prompted Shakespeare to point out in The Merchant of Venice (scene iii), that even “the devil can quote scripture for his own purpose.”

Which brings me to the real message about Temptation that I wish to address this morning. It’s about the temptation of scripture.

Allow me to begin my illustration of this by introducing you to my neon-pink “Answer Me Jesus”. I brought this with me to the last General Convention and it was an instant hit. In fact, the deputation from the Diocese of Massachusetts borrowed “Answer Me Jesus” for three full days. I had to talk pretty fast to get him back to The Diocese of Newark's table.


In the bottom of this statue of our Lord rests one of those Magic 8-Balls. You may remember them from your youth. You ask it a question like, “Will I have a date for Friday night?” And the Magic 8-Ball will give you an answer – something frustrating like, “Ask me again later” which was never helpful if you procrastinated an didn’t ask your question until Friday afternoon.

Sometimes, if you were lucky, it would be definitive: ‘Yes!’ or ‘No’. And, if you didn’t like the answer, you could try it again and again until you got the answer you wanted. Or, take the best three out of four. Heads I win, tails you lose. No matter. Whatever method you chose, you had an excuse for your joy or your misery. No need to take any responsibility your life.

‘Answer me Jesus’ works in much the same way, except his answers are for spiritual questions. He might answer, “I’ll have to pray about that.” Or, respond flippantly, “Offer it up.” Or, my own personal favorite: “Let me ask my Dad.”

Many of us come to the Season of Lent the same way we turn to Scripture. We move through sacred rituals just as we sift through the words of Holy Writ, looking for magic answers to the questions and temptations that are basic to being human.

We think secretly to ourselves, “If I give up chocolate or television or fried foods, will I be a better person?” We turn to the rituals the way some turn to the Magic 8-Ball or Answer Me Jesus for the answer we want to hear. For some reassurance that our sacrifice is ‘worth it.’ And, if all we hear is ‘Ask me again later” we will. Again. And, again, until we convince ourselves that we are, indeed, righteous in the Lord for this simple sacrifice.

Reading scripture often provides the same temptation. We read the passages we want to read. We hear what we want to hear. Or, as we see in this Sunday's gospel, it can be tempting to do what my friend Dylan Breuer names as the process wherein we "selectively cull words, phrases, and sentences from what we know of scripture -often from entirely different documents, written at different times and in different contexts - and to read the resulting combination as a kind of secret message to us to us today. This tells us less about the meaning of scripture and more about our own psychology and interpretive prejudices than they do about God’s will.

Satan tells Jesus that as God’s son, he can find bread in the desert. That was true in the past – God provided manna in the wilderness for the people of Israel after their exodus from Egypt. It will be true in the future when Jesus feeds thousands from a loaf of bread and a few fish. Satan tells Jesus that the kingdoms of the earth will bow before Jesus, and they will. This is true to this very day. Satan also tells Jesus that God will care for those God loves, especially Jesus, God’s own Holy Child, and that is also true today as it was then.

In every instance, what Satan says is ‘biblical’ and every point Satan makes is, in a sense, true. But, the words of Satan are not the ‘whole truth’. The points he makes are not necessarily the point Scripture was trying to make at the time they were written for the specific audience they were originally intended. Context is important to a full understanding of scripture.

It is tempting to read scripture in this way, isn’t it? To be smug and certain that we have the truth – the whole truth and nothing but the truth, so help me God.

Which brings me to the biggest temptation of all – the temptation which is at the core of a Holy Lent: impatience.

It's certainly one of my biggest flaws. Jesus has an important message about that for us this morning, in this Temptation in the Wilderness. It is not yet time, when he is vulnerable, and this is not the place, in the wilderness, for Jesus to use his powers. He must wait until the time and place are right. Jesus says this very thing just before he performs his first miracle at the Wedding Feast in Cana.

It’s hard to be patient, isn’t it? Especially when you already know the end of the story.

The real temptation of Lent is the same temptation of Scripture – to rush through it. There are still temptations to quote scripture to prove our point or make our argument for us. Jesus shows us a different way. He invites us to come in from the desert, to be nourished by the Body of Christ.

Jesus resists the temptation to play a round of 'scriptural gymnastics'. Instead, he invites us to wrestle together with what we find in scripture, and to help one another listen for the voice of the Spirit, who leads us into the truth of God's call to us here and now, in our day and time.

The temptation to rush through Lent is much the same. We are impatient. We want to skip the struggle. We want to get on with it. We know how the story ends, so what’s the point?

As you enter into the discipline of self-sacrifice, allow yourself the luxury of time to really live into the fullness of the experience of Lent. Savor it. Marinate your soul in it.

There are few places in your life where you can afford this kind of luxury. Church is one of those places. With all due respect to St. Paul, scripture is not about pristine logic. With the same respect due to St. Matthew, neither is it about connecting the dots.

Scripture is about faith, not certainty.

So is Lent - a season of forty days and forty nights to live into taking the risk of your faith - to trust your hunger, to embrace your pain, to understand your own poverty. To have patience and listen to what God might have to say to you about these three things that are central to the enterprise of being human.

The world will try to tempt you away from this important spiritual discipline. Be patient with yourself. Enter into Lent fully – w/holly – that you may have a Holy Lent. It may leave you with more questions than when you began. Live the questions, as the poet Rilke writes, into the answer which God has for you, that you may have life and have it more abundantly, if not righteously.

If all else fails, you can always ask Jesus. Not this neon-Pink one. Ask the one who lives deep in the wilderness of your heart.

Just don’t be surprised - or disappointed - by his answer. Amen.

Update: Mother


The news is good: My mother's condition has stabilized. She will be transferred to a Rehabilitative Center not far from home where she will continue to stabilize while they work on increasing her strength and endurance. We're figuring she'll be there for about 30 days or so before they evaluate whether or not she can return to her home (she lives with my youngest sister and her family).

"We'll take it one day at a time," Mother rasped into the phone, her oxygen shushing loudly over the phone line, adding, "I'm going to be 85 in July, but I'm not dead yet. Far from it."

Thanks be to God - and to all of you for your prayers and concern and love.

She's a tough old bird.

And yes, the apple does not fall far from the tree.

Snakes in the Baptismal Water


"I think I've found a spiritual home!"

Even the one-dimensional aspect of communication in cyberspace couldn't hide her absolute delight. My friend, a woman very dear to my heart, has been searching for a long time to find a church. A community of Christians. A place where she can be nourished by the Body of Blood of Jesus, be inspired by the Gospel preached with passion and intelligence, and find some solace in "those old, old songs of Jesus and his love."

She has the worst track record of church shopping of anyone I know. It's as if someone has placed a 'lune magnet' in her soul. So, I was understandably cautious when she wrote to say that she went to church on Ash Wednesday and was thrilled with the community, the priest, the music - and just couldn't wait to go to church on Sunday.

I immediately googled the place. In ten seconds flat I was gasping in horror. The church still identifies itself as "Episcopal" but the only links on the home page were to rabidly orthodox organizations that are hell-bent on destroying The Episcopal Church. No links to the local diocese or the national Episcopal Church.

Hmm . . . Seems to me there are more than a few red flags in the center aisle of the church.

When I checked under the heading "Information" there it was - a link to "Virtue on Line." At that point, the warning buzzer was going off, the strobe lights were flashing and a neon-sign appeared crying, "Danger! Danger! Danger!"

Curious, and trying to keep hope alive, I went to the Rector's page. It began with some fairly innocent ruminations about the Diocese of San Joaquin and ended with this little tidbit (These boyss just can't help themselves, can they?):

"Found while researching and provided with no comment.

"Paul singles out homosexual intercourse for special attention because he regards it as providing a particularly graphic image of the way in which humans distort God’s created order. God the Creator made man and woman for each other, to cleave together, to be fruitful and multiply."

When human beings exchange these created roles for homosexual intercourse, they embody the spiritual condition of those who have exchanged the truth about God for a lie."

I began to cry. My friend is decidedly heterosexual (she can't help it - that's just the way she was born ;~), but as she says, "I'm straight, not narrow." She is a justice-warrior and a spiritual healer. She has a seminary education in the Methodist tradition, and is intelligent and articulate and incredibly creative and resourceful. She does have a decided preference for the evangelical, charismatic style of worship. She just has a 'lune magnet' for dysfunctional churches. I wept for my friend and the bitter disappointment she would, once again, have to face.

How long, O Lord, how long?

After I dried my eyes, blew my nose and pulled up my socks, I did two things: First, I wrote a short note to the good father, thanking him for the clarity of his website message. I wrote it from a thankful heart. Truly. Genuinely.

There are lots of snakes in the baptismal water - those who say one thing about themselves and then pull the old 'bait and switch' routine. They are ecclesiastical predators hiding behind the banner of Evangelism.

Their favorite catch is exactly like my friend - not from The Episcopal Church or knowledgeable about either our tradition or the recent troubles, much less all the political innuendos and subterfuge. The only 'virtue' she knows about is the classic kind - not what's presently online.

They lure in folks like my friend, molding them to their image of The Episcopal Church, and then the next thing you know, you can hear Billy Joel singing in the background about the angry young man, "with his fist in the air and his head in the sand."

I was at least grateful that this man seemed to have some integrity and transparency about his theological and political inclinations. So, I wrote and told him so.

Then, I wrote to my friend to warn her of what to expect. I wasn't expecting her reaction. She FLIPPED OUT. How could I say these things? I hadn't even met the guy or been to the church? How could I be so mean-spirited and judgmental? I should step back, take a deep breath, say my prayers and, if necessary, see my therapist.

Then, she wrote to the priest at this church and asked him"Do you and your congregation receive God's children, whoever they are, whatever lifestyle/ orientation/ wealth/ size/ age/ ethnicity/profession, or other ism nature or nurture has provided for them, is there judgment of them for any reason whatsoever, or are some just not welcome?"

And, no fool, he answered: "Absolutely, yes to the first part, no to the second part! And third, we welcome every person who comes through the door. I don't know how to do otherwise. I suspect you felt that from me and from the people at the service. It's unfortunate when people make judgments about others without ever meeting them. It's actually stereo-typing that some so often complain about when done to them, but don't seem to be aware of when they do it themselves!"

She sent it on to me, triumphant. "There, see!" she exclaimed. Shame on you!"

"Okay," I wrote back, "but when you see him, ask him what he says or does after he says, 'Hello' and 'Welcome.' Can an LGBT person serve in a leadership capacity in his church? Would the commitment of LGBT people to each other be recognized and blessed in that church? Would an LGBT person with a vocation to ordination receive support from him and the church? Might they be elected to represent the church at diocesan convention? "

She promised to make these inquiries after today's church visit when she would set up a time to meet with him in the next week or two, as their schedules allowed.

This just appeared in my 'inbox': "Ok: you were right. The service was high mass, RC, sung. (minus the smells and bells however). The sermon was one narrow minded, oppressive and unappealing barrage of on-the-surface gleanings from Luther and Calvin, at the heart of it, murmurings of a man on a mission. Not a good mission. How you saw that before me is absolutely amazing to me. Nice man. Means well. Has no clue what he is creating I think. And that woman I was very sure was his wife. Nope. Whatever the relationship there, not his wife.

So, I will just say sorry. I really didn't understand the implications.

I won't be going back. Not for me. No joy there. I need joy. But the music was okay. Just not enough of it. "

I take no joy in any of this. Indeed, it absolutely breaks my heart.

For me, this is one of the microcosms of the macrocosm of The Episcopal Church. It's tragic. And, it's going on all the time. This is exactly how things like San Joaquin, Pittsburgh and Fort Worth happen. Slowly, over time. One parish after another. I do believe even Jesus weeps to see this kind of damage done in His Holy and Blessed Name.

I never thought I'd hear myself say this, but the sooner this guy takes the word "Episcopal" out of his church's title, the better off we'll all be.

Lord, have mercy.

Oh, and please pray for my friend, that she might find a way to disengage her internal 'lune magnet' and find a spiritual home.

Friday, February 08, 2008

Friday morning 'Ticklebox' Repair


Don't blame me, blame Doug.

Two bees met in a field. One said to the other, "How are things going?"

"Really bad," said the second bee. "The weather has been cold, wet and damp, and there aren't any flowers, so I can't make honey."

"No problem," said the first bee. "Just fly down five blocks and turn left. Keep going until you see all the cars. There's a Bar Mitzvah going on and there are all kinds of fresh flowers and fresh fruit."

"Thanks for the tip," said the second bee, and flew away.

A few hours later the two bees ran into each other again. The first bee asked, "How'd it go?"

"Great!" said the second bee. "It was everything you said it would be. There was plenty of fruit and, oh, such huge floral arrangements on every table."

"Uh, what's that thing on your head?" asked the first bee.

"That's my yarmulke," said the second bee. "I didn't want them to think I was a wasp."

Thursday, February 07, 2008

Scenes from a Diocesan Convention Banquet

Ross Wisnewski, a dear friend who also happens to be the Diocesan Stewardship Chair, took these pictures at the Diocesan Convention Banquet a few weeks ago.

Most of these affairs are deadly, boring necessities.

If you want theological types like priests and their spouses to act out, put us in a situation where we have to behave while those in authority are about to drone on for an hour about admittedly important topics like justice, poverty, vision, hopes and dreams.

It was my good fortune to sit with two great clergy friends - Orion Davis and Ken Near - at the dinner table.

It all started because Orion liked my jacket. I told him that I liked his. So, we swapped.

Jackets, that is.

That's Ken in the middle, trying to negotiate a deal where he could wear my jacket, too, some time.

What you can't see is that everyone else at our table is stunned by Orion's 'behavior".

They think of him as a conservative, sedate, nearing retirement country cleric. Clearly, they don't know the man I know - and love dearly.
And, this is the beginning of the Annual Diocesan Spoon Contest.

I hold the all time, undefeated record, balancing six . . . count 'em SIX . . . spoons on my face.

One each on each of my ears, my nose, cheek bones, and chin.

Hey, girls just wanna have fun - especially with two of her favorite clergy brothers!

(Somehow, I have a feeling we won't be sitting together next Convention Banquet.)

Note to the RCCL: Please DND

I promise I will write about my mother-daughter experience but I have to get this off my chest first. I also think it's important to know what preceded it.

While we were visiting, a Eucharistic Visitor from the local RC church came by to bring the Holy Sacrament to my mother. I was really appreciative of that wonderful gift and felt happy that my mother would be able to partake in Holy Eucharist, even though she was unable to attend church.

A woman in her mid-70's, she appeared to be very professional if not in a uniform of sorts: A green plaid pleated skirt, solid green, tailored jacket with several pens neatly lined up in the chest pocket, a white button-down lightly starched shirt, the 'peter pan' collar straining to be held together at her neck by a silver religious pin that said, 'Eucharistic Visitor'. She wore black orthopedic shoes and black tights. She also wore a cross with a corpus in obvious agony hanging from her neck and held in her hand a very large well-polished silver ciborium that was wrapped into a computer-generated list.

You would never confuse this woman with the 'TV Lady' or even the Nutritionist or Physical or Occupational Therapist.

She was the very model of efficiency. I'll just call her "The RC Church Lady." That's RCCL for short.

The RCCL said 'good morning' to my mother who, in turn, introduced my daughter and I, going at lengths to mention that we were visiting from NYC and NJ. RCCL glanced over our way and gave the most miserly small, what could only be described as very sour smile (no, I was not wearing a clerical collar).

The RCCL looked up at the clock over my mother's bed as she asked, "How are you doing today?" in a way that told you immediately that this was a strictly perfunctory question.

As my mother politely answered her question anyway, the RCCL made a great fuss about unfolding her computer visitor list and then, interrupting my mother's response mid-sentence asked to verify her name. "Why yes," my mother said sweetly (I recognized the tone immediately and knew exactly where this might lead).

"And you're Catholic, right?"

"Yes, of course," said my mother, as if to say, "D'uh!"

"I'm Catholic, too," I heard myself say. My daughter quickly chimed in, "Me, too!"

It was very fleeting, but I do know that a tiny smirk appeared in the left lower corner of my mother's lips. We've had this conversation before. My daughter and I are 'Anglo-Catholic' and we refuse to let Rome claim sole propriety on that word. Even my RC mother gets that.

That smirk on my mothers lips as she recognized the boldness of her daughter and grand daughter dissipated her own need to show the RCCL, as my mother would often say, "the backside of my hand."

The RCCL never looked our way, much less offered us the Sacrament. Instead, she snapped a pen from her jacket pocket and placed a check by my mother's name. "Okay," she said, getting right down to the 'real business' of the visit, "It's time for communion. Let's say the Lord's Prayer together," adding sternly, "Girls, I know your mother taught you this, so you say it with us."

Ah, sweet inclusion!

"Yes, course," I said, startling myself at how much I sounded like my mother. The RCCL forged ahead, blessing herself as she said, "In the name of the Father, and the Son . . . ."

I decided to let go of any anger that was brewing within me, close my eyes, and pray with and for my mother. But, as we ended that wonderfully familiar, universal Christian prayer, something in the RCCL's voice annoyed my ears. I looked up and saw that she was saying, " . . .and lead us not into temptation . . ." while looking up at the clock and writing down the time on her paper.

My mother didn't even have a chance to say a full 'Amen' when the ciborium was popped open, a small, paper-thin, round communion wafer emerged and the RCCL was saying, "Body of Christ" in the same tone as she might say, "Today is Tuesday."

As my mother said, "Amen," the RCCL snapped shut the ciborium, smiled one of the most inauthentic smiles I have ever witnessed and said, "I hope you feel better. I'll be back tomorrow."

And, without so much as a fair-thee-well or a a fiddle-dee-dee, the RCCL turned on the heel of her black orthopedic shoe and left the room.

My mother looked over to my daughter and I and, noting the stunned looks on our faces, performed the second miracle of the day. She said something to us that she has never, ever said before - well, at least concerning her church.

"I'm sorry," she said, apologizing for the woman's obvious rudeness and bad manners.

"It's okay, VaVoa," my daughter rushed to comfort her grandmother. "It's not your fault."

"Never mind about us," I offered, "We're fine. Think how awful it must be to be a daughter or grand daughter of hers."

"Yeah," said my daughter, "She was just a jerk. One bad apple. Don't let her spoil the whole barrel."

"No," my mother said sadly, "They're all like that. They are all so full of themselves and too proud of the privilege they've been given. They're wrong. You're right. And, I'm sorry."

I'm not sure, but I think the heavenly chorus started singing at that very moment. Then again, it might have been something over the hospital intercom (over which they also say the Rosary promptly at 8:45, immediately preceding the announcement that visiting hours are over at 9 PM. My mother thinks the woman who leads the recitation of the Rosary is this woman's sister. "She's very annoying," my mother says.)

I'm told that this hospital has started a new classification of religious affiliation. There's "Catholic" - clearly, 90% of the book. There's a much, much smaller "Protestant" section - which has sub-sections of "Methodist," "Lutheran," "Episcopalian," "Baptist," "Pentecostal, "Jehovah's Witness," "Non-denominational" and even, "Seventh Day Adventists."

But, the section that is even larger than that is the one entitled, "DND".

That stands for - are you ready? - "DO NOT DISTURB".

That's the newest 'religious category' and it's the fastest growing, I'm told.

If I'm ever a patient in that hospital, promise that you'll make sure I'm classified "DND." Otherwise, this mother's daughter just might have to show someone "the backside of my hand."