Come in! Come in!

"If you are a dreamer, come in. If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, a Hope-er, a Pray-er, a Magic Bean buyer; if you're a pretender, come sit by my fire. For we have some flax-golden tales to spin. Come in! Come in!" -- Shel Silverstein

Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Suadade


It's an overcast, cloudy but pleasantly warm day here at Rehoboth Bay, which almost perfectly matches the interior of my psyche this morning.

It started innocently enough. I was watching "The Other Boleyn Girl" last night and something about the dynamic between the sisters, Ann and Mary, and their mother caught me completely off guard. I got all weepy and girly-burbly and just couldn't shake it.

I've been writing furiously this morning since about 6 AM, sorting out the Stories of My Youth and the Myth of My Mother. I can't - won't - publish any of it. There are, in fact, boundaries, even in the seemingly vast limitlessness of cyberspace. But, I write here, on my blog, to say a few things so y'all don't worry too much about me.

This grief work is hard stuff, even on a good day, but there's something about the grief associated with the loss of one's mother that makes it seem, sometimes, too much for one's heart and mind and soul to bear.

I've been going over the snapshots in my head, slowly turning the pages of my memory like an old, dusty, yellow-with-age, but dearly beloved photo album.

There I am at my birthday party. I don't know. I'm six or seven. Maybe older.

I can see the cake and the candles - the birthday presents piled high around me. I can see my sisters and young brother - The Little Prince, we sisters called him through grit teeth. I can see my aunts and cousins, my grandmother and Bella, my "fairy godmother", as I still call her.

My parents broke tradition and had Bella and Larry, my mother's friend from work, as godparents to all four of their children. That was nothing less than a scandal in my immigrant family - which my mother seemed to delight in and never missed an opportunity to announce that, if anything, God forbid, should happen to her or my father, Bella and Larry would take care of us. We'd go to live with them, she said emphatically. You couldn't miss the scowls on the faces of my aunts, her sisters.

I can see my father and the rest of the men of my family, over in the living room, smoking Pall Mall unfiltered cigarettes and drinking my grandfather's homemade whiskey and beer.

Boiler-makers, I think they were called, and aptly so. My experience, even at a very young age, was that tempers flared in direct proportion to the amount of alcohol consumed.

I can see all that, but I can't see my mother. I know she's there, but I can't see her. She's present - very present - but not in the picture.

And, I am not happy. Decidedly not happy. I think that was my first memory of knowing that I didn't belong here. There. What I really wanted for my birthday present was "out". Gone. Anywhere but there. Here. With "them" and their false laughter and lavish displays of saccharine affection.

My grandmother, the story goes, 'ran away from home' in Portugal at age 13. Her mother had died and she, being the youngest of 16 children and the only girl, knew her fate. She said she 'faked' the intensity of her grieving in order to convince her father that she really ought to visit her aunts in Boston for a few months - just to get the maternal comfort her father and brothers could not provide and recover before she returned to care of them, the way her mother did.

Except, she never did. She never went back to Portugal. Ever. Not even for a visit. Indeed, she married my grandfather just shortly before her 16th birthday. Together, as was often the case in those days, they had 20 pregnancies and 22 children.

This story was told often and in many ways - in the stories my grandmother told us at night or whenever a new person came into the family, either by birth or marriage. She would allude to it when she read stories in her little black bible, which she read from several times a day. The stories of Mariam and Moses, Ruth and Naomi, Joseph and his brothers all held elements that tugged on her heart and pulled out the threads of the sacred story of her own life.

She also played her Portuguese guitara and sang about it in the traditional style of Portuguese 'fado' - a folk song that sounds rather like a lament. Fado, roughly translated means "destiny" or "fate."

Mind you, my grandfather would always walk out of the room when she sang 'fado'. Only Portuguese men were allowed to sing this particular kind of song. Only men, you see, are in control of destiny. As much as he loved to hear my grandmother's beautiful voice and her soulful guitar playing, his loyalty to the tradition of his homeland was stronger.

A fado is sad but in a nostalgic kind of way, if you can understand. The Portuguese word, as I remember my 'Mother tongue' is "suadade" which doesn't exactly translate to 'nostalgia'. (Luiz, if you're reading this, help me out here.) The best I can describe it is that it must be the sound the soul makes when it is longing for a return to something, but tinged with a mixture that I call "regret and gratitude" that you can't return - probably wouldn't, even if you could.

That probably doesn't make much sense, but I think it captures where I was on that birthday and where I am right now. Indeed, as I look at that snapshot of my memory, if I close my eyes, I can hear my grandmother singing a fado for my birthday.

And, as I listen, as I follow the sound of my grandmother's voice, I suddenly find my mother. She's off in the kitchen, weeping over the preparation of my birthday meal. She doesn't know why she is crying, exactly, but she's sad in a "regret and gratitude" sort of way. She's weeping because her 'baby' is getting older and so is she.

She's weeping because she knows, deep in her heart, that she has to get out of this place. She's caught between two worlds - her status as immigrant and the American Dream which seems, in this moment, to be painfully illusive. She's caught between the proud heritage of being Portuguese and the reality of being and American.

She doesn't really fit in either place, but she knows that if she doesn't leave this tenement apartment, this city, this family, her daughters don't stand a chance of an 'igloo in Florida' (one of her favorite expressions when I was a kid) of living the dream her mother gave to her and the one she is trying to give to her children.

At least, that's the story as I remember it. The fact is that, shortly after that birthday party, my mother went back to work full time. And, in three years time, they had enough money to buy their own home. In Westport. The suburbs. The place where they could finally live the Great American Dream.

The story of leaving one's family to 'find a better life' and 'be on your own' has become a myth in my family and that myth, in many ways, drives the family dynamic in sometimes positive but often negative ways.

I am keenly aware, this morning, of the power of that myth. I realize that the place I am in right now is 'suadade'. If you drew a map of the landscape of grief, you probably wouldn't find it, but I am here. In this place. This Land of Regret and Gratitude.

I am here in the place of Suadade, turning the pages of my life, my mother and grandmother's life, and noticing things done and left undone, things said and left unsaid. Regret and Gratitude.

My soul is singing a fado this morning. In many ways, it is the song of my life. I am singing it for my life. For my mother's life. For my grandmother's life. For the life of my children and grandchildren.

It is the song of the unfinished and factually questionable stories which become the myths that are at the center of my life.

All our lives, I'm thinking.

It's not a bad place. It's not a place I want to visit often, but I think we all need to travel there - here - every once in a while.

I won't stay long. It's just where I need to be right now.

Tuesday, August 12, 2008

Buddy, can you spare a few tuppance?


The Archbishop of Canterbury flanked by Primates of the Anglican Communion.
(ACNS/Gunn)

Anglicans fundraising to fill Lambeth shortfall
by Jennifer Gold
Christian Today
Posted: Tuesday, August 12, 2008, 10:40 (BST)


The Archbishop’s Council of the Church of England has issued a £600,000 loan to help organisers of the recent Lambeth Conference pay outstanding bills.

The interest free loan was made to the Lambeth Conference Company, the arm of the Anglican Communion charged with organising the conference.

The Archbishop’s Council and the Church of England’s Board of Governors of the Church Commissioners agreed to issue the loan in an emergency meeting to address a £1m shortfall in the Lambeth Conference budget.

A spokesperson for the Church of England said on Monday, "The [Lambeth Conference] Company has assured the Board and the Council that it is continuing to make further approaches throughout the Anglican Communion to meet the full cost of this year's Conference.

"It cannot, however, be confident that these will generate funds sufficiently quickly for it to meet all of its obligations as they fall due over the coming weeks and months."

Eyes are turned towards the Episcopal Church of the USA as the wealthiest province in the Communion to stump up the extra cash.

Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori confirmed that the Church had been asked to help pay for the conference, which brought more than 600 bishops to the University of Kent in Canterbury last month.

She also alluded to the possibility of the Archbishop of Canterbury embarking on a fundraising tour of the US, although Lambeth Palace dismissed the idea, according to The Telegraph.

The Church of England said that the Board and the Council would return to the issue of paying for Lambeth in September meetings.

If laughter is the best medicine . . . .



I'm healed!


Hat tip to Doug, who is absolutely committed to my having a good vacation.

WARNING: Not responsible for damage to your computer or laptop if you are eating or drinking anything while watching this clip.

Monday, August 11, 2008

A modest proposal from Ft. Worth


PROPOSAL

We request that the Catholic Diocese of Fort Worth provide the guidance necessary so that we might "make a proposal" that would lead our Diocese into full communion with the See of Peter.

We believe this guidance is necessary for the following reasons:

1. We cannot adequately prepare such a proposal without input from those to whom the proposal is to be made.

2. Such guidance would help us through the complicated aspects of this proposal.

3. With this guidance, the Holy Spirit could affect more quickly the healing of this portion of the broken Body of Christ.

Should you consent, we gladly offer ourselves for this important work and stand ready to work with those you might designate.

Katie Sherrod has the rest.

Read it all here

Me? Well . . .there are no words . . . .simply no words at all.

Blame it on Doug . . .


Just what I needed to start my vacation . . . .

LOST IN THE DARNDEST PLACES:


An elderly Floridian called 911 on her cell phone to report that her car has been broken into. She is hysterical as she explains her situation to the dispatcher: 'They've stolen the stereo, the steering wheel, the brake pedal and even the accelerator!' she cried.

The dispatcher said, 'Stay calm. An officer is on the way.'

A few minutes later, the officer radios in. 'Disregard.' He says. 'She got in the back-seat by mistake.'

_____________________________________________________________________

FAMILY

Three sisters, ages 92, 94 and 96, live in a house together. One night the 96-year-old draws a bath. She puts her foot in and pauses. She yells to the other sisters, 'Was I getting in or out of the bath?'

The 94-year-old yells back, 'I don't know. I'll come up and see.' She starts up the stairs and pauses... 'Was I going up the stairs or down?'

The 92-year-old is sitting at the kitchen table having tea listening to her sisters. She shakes her head and says, 'I sure hope I never get that forgetful, knock on wood.' She then yells, 'I'll come up and help both of you as soon as I see who's at the door.'

________________________________________________________________________

'I CAN HEAR JUST FINE!'

Three retirees, each with a hearing loss, were playing golf one fine March day. One remarked to the other, 'Windy, isn't it?'

'No,' the second man replied, 'it's Thursday.'

And the third man chimed in, 'So am I. Let's have a beer.'

_______________________________________________________________________

LITTLE LADY:

A little old lady was running up and down the halls in a nursing home. As she walked, she would flip up the hem of her nightgown and say 'Supersex.'

She walked up to an elderly man in a wheelchair. Flipping her gown at him, she said, 'Supersex.'

He sat silently for a moment or two and finally answered, 'I'll take the soup.'

_______________________________________________________________________

OLD FRIENDS:


Two elderly ladies had been friends for many decades. Over the years, they had shared all kinds of activities and adventures. Lately, their activities had been limited to meeting a few times a week to play cards.

One day, they were playing cards when one looked at the other and said, 'Now don't get mad at me .. I know we've been friends for a long time, but I just can't think of your name! I've thought and thought, but I can't remember it. Please tell me what your name is.'

Her friend glared at her. For at least three minutes she just stared and glared at her. Finally she said, 'How soon do you need to know?'

_______________________________________________________________________

SENIOR DRIVING


As a senior citizen was driving down the freeway, his car phone rang. Answering, he heard his wife's voice urgently warning him, 'Herman, I just heard on the news that there's a car going the wrong way on Interstate 77. Please be careful!'

'Heck,' said Herman, 'It's not just one car. It's hundreds of them!'

_______________________________________________________________________

DRIVING

Two elderly women were out driving in a large car - both could barely see over the dashboard. As they were cruising along, they came to an intersection. The stoplight was red, but they just went on through.

The woman in the passenger seat thought to herself 'I must be losing it. I could have sworn we just went through a red light.' After a few more minutes, they came to another intersection and the light was red again. Again, they went right through.

The woman in the passenger seat was almost sure that the light had been red but was really concerned that she was losing it. She was getting nervous.

At the next intersection, sure enough, the light was red and they went on through. So, she turned to the other woman and said, 'Mildred, did you know that we just ran through three red lights in a row? You could have killed us both!'

Mildred turned to her and said, 'Oh, crap, am I driving ?'

V-A-C-A-T-I-O-N!!!!!



In about two hours, I squeeze myself into my tightly packed car and head to Llangollen, our wee cottage on Rehoboth Bay where I will stay until Labor Day.

Well, that's the plan, at least.

It really doesn't matter that today is cloudy and overcast with chance of occasional showers. I don't even know the weather forecast for the Delmarva Peninsula.

And, you know what? I don't care.

I can't wait (can you tell?).

Yes, of course, I'll be 'blogging'. I'll just be doing it out on the deck in my jammies over a third cuppajoe with none but the seagulls to read over my shoulder.

Woo-hoo!

If you're in the area (and even if you're not), do come by. The corn and tomatoes are amazing this time of year. I'll pull up some crabs from the end of our pier, steam them with tons of Old Bay, and we'll feast like royalty.

Y'all have a standing invitation. Just bring your favorite libation.

I haven't left yet, but already, I'm outta here!

Sunday, August 10, 2008

Abby Turns Two


Warning - Danger - Sweetness Alert

Very proud Nana with pictures prepares to display scenes from
a Birthday Party for a two year old.

Those with dental problems ought not get this close to something this sweet.

You have been warned.


It takes a lot of wind to blow out two whole candles
AND a number 2 candle!


But Ms. Abba-Dabba is up for the task.

Because it means that she gets to eat Elmo
and his beach ball.


She also gets to watch her favorite DVD of
Barney with her friends.


Iron-clad evidence that Barney is like crack cocaine for kids.

Slip-n-Slide is always great fun!
This was one of MacKenna's Birthday presents


Mackie J and her Nana chill

All-in-all it was a great day for a birthday party.

" . . .why do you doubt?" Matthew 14:22-33


"You of little faith, why did you doubt?" Matthew 14:22-33
XIII Pentecost August 10, 2008
The Episcopal Church of St. Paul
(the Rev’d Dr.) Elizabeth Kaeton
rector and pastor

This morning’s gospel scene is quite dramatic. Jesus is trying to get a little quiet time in prayer and meditation, but it is not to be so. There is storm and tempest and even ghosts on water. The disciples are in a panic, Peter almost drowns and Jesus has to save the day.

Well, even so, I have to tell you, this gospel passage is not as dramatic as the past three weeks have been for me. Trust me. Jesus never had to contend with my dysfunctional family during a funeral service!

And, you haven’t seen anything until you’ve seen the once--upon-a-decade Lambeth Conference – or, what I like to call, “My Big Fat Anglican Family Reunion.”

Who in their right mind would plan a family reunion once a decade to last for three entire weeks and not expect there to be at least a few problems? Whoever it was that said “Fish and relatives after three days stink” had attended at least one family reunion in her life.

I must admit, I haven’t yet made any more sense of my mother’s sudden death on July 29th than I have of the events of the Lambeth Conference. Both seem, even with almost a week’s distance from them both, a bit surreal in the aftermath.

Someone once said that the British come to a meeting looking for resolution, Americans come looking for a process, and Africans come looking for a sign. All of that was at play in Canterbury There seemed to be two Lambeth Conferences going on at the same time. Bishop Mark Beckwith called them “right brain and left brain” conferences

There was the Lambeth Conference where the bishops tried to be the church, or the leaders of the Anglican church at bible study and prayer, Eucharistic worship and discussion, which they called ‘Indaba groups’ – a Zulu word meaning "important conference".

From all reports, from the bishops' blogs as well as on the ground, the bishops were firmly committed to listening to and hearing each other’s stories, building relationships, and growing in community. The overwhelming sense was that there was a heartfelt desire to accommodate the diversity of cultural contexts and theological thought in order to keep the Anglican Communion together.

Then, there was the Lambeth Conference that was the Windsor Continuation Process, a group of three retired bishops and a few other highly conservative folk who are trying to develop and Anglican Covenant.

They were, by sharp contrast, harsh and judging, punitive and restrictive. They “suggested” – because neither they nor the Archbishop of Canterbury have the authority to enforce – three moratoria: the blessing of the sacred covenants made by same sex couples, the election and consecration of homosexual bishops and the uninvited incursion of diocesan boundaries by other bishops.

To be quite honest, I find most of it enormously embarrassing – a bit like waking up from a bad dream to discover that my parents really aren’t my parents; rather, my birth parents were more like my batty Aunt Mildred and Uncle Ralph with bad teeth who were both of singularly odious character and ill temperament.

I became an Episcopalian in 1977, having been formally received by Bishop Frederic Barton Wolfe at the Cathedral of St. Luke, Portland, Maine. I became an Episcopalian not just because of the beautiful liturgy and inspiring music, although there was that. I became an Episcopalian because I thought this was, at last, a place were I could worship God and love Jesus like a grown up.

The Episcopal Church demanded that I have a mature faith. It required that I use my intellect as well as my heart and soul. It was a church that insisted that I think as well as feel during liturgy, bringing my whole body, mind and spirit to church.

This was a church that didn’t tell me what to believe, but rather challenged me to explore my belief within the context of the rich Anglican tradition of diverse theological thought and embrace a position as my own.

However, the Episcopal Church has taken bold strides for gospel justice in the last few decades, taking leadership in the movement for Civil Rights, the Rights of Women and LGBT people.

This has become part of a perfect storm of controversy in the Anglican Communion which, as near as I can tell, is one part deep theological division over the role of the church in the rights of women and homosexual people; one part identity crisis in which the boundaries of traditional Anglican tolerance and accommodation have been pushed and challenged; and one part an as old-as-time struggle for power and authority, which have always been core to the centuries-old “Anglican experiment”.

I am sad to say that we are not also helped by the leadership of Rowan Williams, the Archbishop of Canterbury, who is, undoubtedly, a deeply spiritual mystic and a noble learned scholar, but he is decidedly not a leader.

In trying to keep the WWAC together, admittedly not an easy task, he has tried to accommodate the strident and sometimes very noisy voices who claim to represent the ‘orthodoxy’ or ‘true faith’ of the church.

I believe he sees himself as trying to hold onto that middle ground of Anglicanism, the classic 'via media' between the catholicity of Holy Rome, the traditional orthodoxy of Blessed Constantinople and the independent Protestantism that was birthed in Geneva. Unfortunately, when he tries to play the politician, he takes his eyes off Jesus, and like Peter, he starts to sink like a stone. “Lord, help us all!”

If I might, I’d like to offer a suggestion of my own. Here’s where I think my now sainted Mother might be able to help Rowan.

My mother had a lot of what has come to be known as “Mommyisms”. These are the sayings which mothers of a certain generation have that are like parables or Buddhist Dhamma; something to think about and meditate on, like “What is the sound of one hand clapping?”

My mother had two favorites. The first was “Your friends are your teeth while you got them.”

That one was troubling, at first, because it sounded like a Job-esque lament about how all friends ultimately betray and one is left at the end of life alone.

I have come to understand that my mother meant that friendships need to be tended to and cared for or, like teeth, they might fall subject to decay and you just might lose them.

The second one was much more troubling to me, and I confess I didn’t understand it until I saw Rowan Williams in action. My mother would often say, “If you bend over too far, your rear end shows.” (I know, right?)

This one puzzled me until I finally realized that my mother was saying that accommodation can reach a point where you are in jeopardy of, well, making an ass of yourself.

I must admit that it gives me enormous delight to consider the possibility that, when the Archbishop of Canterbury is in prayer and calls upon the saints for guidance, my mother is now able to whisper her words of wisdom in his ear.

I have a wonderful image of Rowan, emerging from prayer, shaking his head and saying to his wife, “Jane, I just got the strangest revelation. I don't know what to make of it.”

I suspect my mother delights in that, too. She couldn’t get her own daughter to listen to her when she was alive. To be able now to whisper in the ears of Popes and other religious leaders is exactly the kind of compensation and reward in her death that my mother hoped and prayed for in her life.

The sudden loss of my mother has compounded my sense of the possible loss of Mother Church. It has been a perfect storm of its own, testing my faith.

But I have come to see that the time has come and now is for us to grow up. It’s time for us to stop bending over to accommodate and stand up straight and tall as Episcopalians and claim our place as mature citizens of the Anglican Communion. We need to keep our eyes neither on Canterbury or Lagos, Nigeria, but on Jesus. Our authority as a church comes from Him.

The Anglican Communion will weather this storm, or it will not. That is a path over which I have no control.

I do believe that the leadership of The Episcopal Church will continue to be faithful to the gospel of Jesus as we understand it. We will continue to work for the radical inclusion of all the baptized in all the sacraments of the church because that, my friends, IS orthodox theology.

The eyes of the world are upon us. We are not the only religious denomination in the midst of this struggle. We are far from alone in the boat. We are not the only ones who find ourselves in the storm.

Jesus is saying to us, as he did to Peter, the rock upon which he built His church, “Come.” We only need hear that call to find our way to the Peace of God which passes all human understanding.

Amen.

Saturday, August 09, 2008

August 18, 1977: The more things change . . .


. . . the more they stay the same.
(Hat tip to Ann Fontaine)



August 18, 1977
Six Episcopal Priests Deposed
Over Women's Ordination
77272

Episcopal News Service

LOS ANGELES, Calif. -- Five Episcopal priests in the Diocese of Los Angeles and one in the Diocese of Colorado have recently been deposed as a culmination of their actions in opposition to the approval of the ordination of women to the priesthood by the 1976 General Convention of the Episcopal Church.

The priests had been inhibited by their bishops from priestly functions for the past six months. According to the Canons of the Church, the depositions were automatic following the six-month period during which the priests had not retracted their acts or declarations.

The priests -- supported by their congregations -- had renounced the authority of their bishops.

In June, Bishop William C. Frey of Colorado deposed the Rev. James Mote of St. Mary's Episcopal Church in Denver, the first of a number of parishes and missions to vote to sever relations with its Episcopal diocese in opposition to the ordination of women.

In August, Bishop Robert C. Rusack of Los Angeles deposed the Rev. John Barker and the Rev. Elwood Trigg of St. Mary of the Angels Church, Hollywood; the Rev. William T. St. John Brown of St. Matthias, Sun Valley; the Rev. Forrest Miller of Our Savior's, Los Angeles; and the Rev. George H. Clendenin of the Church of the Holy Apostles, Glendale.

Meanwhile, litigation of a property dispute involving the Los Angeles area breakaway parishes and the diocese is still pending in Los Angeles Superior Court.

In a letter to the nearly 400 clergy of the Diocese of Los Angeles, Bishop Rusack said he had deposed the men "with great sadness.... I bid your prayers for those men and for me in these days of sorrow. "

Bishop Frey's letter to Mote stated that he is "released from the obligations of the ministerial office and deprived of the right to exercise the gifts and spiritual authority as a minister of God's word and sacrament, as conferred upon you at ordination."

The Rev. Canon C. Harry Christopher of the Diocese of Colorado said of Mote: "We cannot take away his ordination. This isn't a defrocking. The Episcopal Church doesn't do that. It just means that Father Mote's priestly functions aren't valid in the Episcopal Church."

Priests in other dioceses of the Episcopal Church have been inhibited or suspended over the question of the ordination of women to the priesthood and other issues, but their six-month period to allow for a retraction has not expired. Several other Episcopal priests have publicly renounced their Church, and four in the Diocese of Mississippi recently announced their intention to affiliate with the Orthodox Church of America.

The Canons of the Episcopal Church provide for inhibition (suspension), removal -- usually amicable and voluntary -- and deposition of clergy for various reasons. Bishops act in such cases with the advice and consent of their diocesan standing committees, a clergy-lay governing council.

The Canons provide procedures for the restoration of those suspended, removed or deposed.

Breakaway parishes, missions, and priests in California, Nevada, and Colorado, have formed what they have named the Diocese of the Holy Trinity under interim leadership of the retired Bishop of Springfield, the Rt. Rev. Albert A. Chambers, who serves as episcopal visitor.

Several breakaway priests and parishes in the Episcopal Diocese of California have formed what they call the Diocese of San Francisco.

According to a recent announcement by the Rev. Canon Albert J. duBois, the executive vice president of Anglicans United, and a leader, together with Bishop Chambers, in the separatist movement, the Los Angeles based Diocese of the Holy Trinity now includes more than 40 parishes and missions.

Canon duBois -- himself currently under suspension by the Bishop of Long Island -- said that he has assisted in the creation of new deaneries in the Midwest, the East, and the South, which, he said, adds "over seventy other congregations seeking attachment to the Diocese of the Holy Trinity pending their own formation in five other new American Dioceses."

Canon duBois reports that there are at present "over one hundred separatist congregations" in the U.S., and he predicts there will be "over two hundred and fifty such congregations by the end of 1977, with many more in 1978."

Canon duBois said that members of the separatist movement "envision a new 'Anglican-Episcopal Province of the Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church' based in the U. S. A. by the end of 1977."

In an effort to establish the structure of a "continuing" Episcopal Church, the Fellowship of Concerned Churchmen -- an umbrella group of 15 organizations and publications of Anglican traditionalists -- has called a Church Congress for Sept. 14-16 at the Chase-Park Plaza Hotel in St. Louis. About 1,000 persons are reported to be registered for that meeting.

The Bishop of Grimsby's Campaign for Orthodoxy

Bishop David Douglas James Rossdale is the Bishop Suffragan of Grimsby, Diocese of Lincoln, which is within the Province of Canterbury, UK.

The Diocese of Lincoln's webpage says this about him: "Bishop David’s vision for the church is that each congregation should be authentically engaged with and relevant to the community in which it worships. He is currently studying how the work of Vicars is changing and how the church can make best use of them amidst all the changes which are going on both in society and in the Church. Bishop David enjoys travelling, cooking, computers and DIY."

Bishop David also has a blog, which is called, interestingly enough, "Bishop David's Blog". This is his latest entry.

I think I'm in love with Bishop David:

If resolution 1.10 is important, what about resolution 19?

The more I read the final Lambeth Document, “Capturing Conversations and Reflections”, the more I rejoice that we did not go down the road of resolutions and votes. To have a ’snapshot’ of the engagement between the Bishops is probably of far more worth, than adding to the fossilised remains of earlier conferences, which leave skeletal resolutions disconnected from the tissue of conversation lying behind them as some sort of guide to the heart and mind of the church.

Much has been made of Resolution 1.10 from the 1998 Conference, as though this is an enduring and unerring piece of truth. It has become almost a test for orthodoxy. But if this resolution has such enduring status, then all resolutions of the Lambeth Conference must be given the same status. So what about Resolution 67 from 1908? Very importantly it states

“We desire earnestly to warn members of our Communion against contracting marriages with Roman Catholics under the conditions imposed by modern Roman canon law, especially as these conditions involve the performance of the marriage ceremony without any prayer or invocation of the divine blessing, and also a promise to have their children brought up in a religious system which they cannot themselves accept.”

I am also concerned that there is not enough campaigning with regard to Resolution 6.f from 1888:

“That the most careful regard should be had to the danger of any encroachment upon the rest which, on this day, is the right of servants as well as their masters, and of the working classes as well as their employers.”

and what has been done about Resolution 36 from 1908?

“The Conference, having regard to the uncertainty which exists as to the permanence of the practice commended by St. James (5.14), and having regard to the history of the practice which professes to be based upon that commendation, does not recommend the sanctioning of the anointing of the sick as a rite of the Church.

It does not, however, advise the prohibition of all anointing, if anointing be earnestly desired by the sick person. In all such cases the parish priest should seek the counsel of the bishop of the diocese. Care must be taken that no return be made to the later custom of anointing as a preparation for death.”


But most urgently of all, how do we reconcile Resolution 19 from 1897 with 1.10 from 1998?

“That it is important that, so far as possible, the Church should be adapted to local circumstances, and the people brought to feel in all ways that no burdens in the way of foreign customs are laid upon them, and nothing is required of them but what is of the essence of the faith, and belongs to the due order of the Catholic Church.”

As I heard the conversations between Bishops from very different context explaining how issues in sexuality affected their mission within their context, social norms and cultural inheritance - Resolution 19 sounded very modern. It addresses the crux of these matters - what is the essence of faith and of order? The conversations of which I was part were really about ‘foreign customs’ being forced upon radically different parts of the Communion - and some of those radically different parts were contained within the same province!

So I am starting a campaign for Resolution 19 and it will become my ‘litmus test’ for orthodoxy.

A Preaching Experiment


Preface: I have discovered that preaching is one part prose, one part poetry, one part theology, one part performance - and all of it must come from a place of truth in the preacher.

This last part is the most important part. If the preacher isn't preaching her truth, the congregation will sniff it out within the first ten seconds, listen politely with half of one ear and dismiss the rest as more hooey from the church.

Even if the preacher has a high doctrine of the word and preaches a very dense theological statement, the congregation may not understand, completely, but they will appreciate the truth. They can tell when the preacher is a liar.

St. Paul is a prime example of knowing his audience and tailoring his message accordingly.

Because of all this, I am enormously intimidated by "extemporaneous preaching" - sometimes known as "preaching without notes."

For me, it's more like "preaching without a net." I think what I fear most is that, without notes, I will begin to rely on performance and that, fueled by anxiety, will come less from a place of truth in me and more from a place of "persona."

I am in awe of preachers who can preach like this effectively.

I've been challenged by a sister colleague to try to "preach from a prepared heart" - To write out my sermon, but then to put it aside and just preach.

Yesterday, I did just that.

I was at a skilled nursing facility to preside at a eucharistic liturgy to celebrate the life of Helen, a woman who has been a member of St. Paul's for more than 50 years who died three weeks ago. She moved to this facility eight years ago at the age of 90. It had been her home. Her two sons decided to have the service there so her friends and the staff could attend.

I wanted to keep my message simple but clear and bring them some solace. I don't know how to do that without being able to move among the elderly and make eye contact, which, I have discovered, is a very important pastoral act with this generation.

It seemed like the right time to give 'preaching from a prepared heart' a chance.

You can't tell how I did, but these are my notes. As is my style, I called up Helen's two sons, Richard and Robert, in the midst of my homily to give witness and testimony to her life and then ended by repeating the one message of the gospel I wanted them to hear.

I think it went well. I wasn't half as nervous as I thought I would be. Looking into ancient eyes, eager to hear a word of comfort and solace, was a little gift and blessing I gave myself.


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Jesus said, "In my father’s house there are many rooms." (Jn 14:1-6)

I want to begin by asking a question: How many of you here had their own room as a child? Raise your hand. Quite a few, I see.

I suppose I did, at least for the first four years of my life, but I don't remember that room. I am the oldest of four children, all born approximately 2 years apart. As a young child, my parents and siblings and I lived in a three bedroom apartment. Which was fine, when there were three of us.

When my sister Diane was born, she had the nursery, and my sister and brother and I shared a room – my sister and I sleeping in a twin bed and my brother in his small bed.

One Christmas, a little after Diane had turned two, we came home from school to find that our bedrooms had been completely reorganized. My sister Madeline and baby sister Diane shared a room with two twin beds. The nursery had been completely redone as my brother’s room.

I was so excited about the changes I didn’t notice at first that there was no place for me. It suddenly came to me in a burst of anguish and I started to weep. “There’s no place for me,” I sobbed, and collapsed in a heap of despair.

My father came and picked me up and cradled me in his strong arms. “It's okay. Don't worry. Dry your tears and take my hand. I've prepared a wonderful room for you."

I had no idea where we were going, but I knew we were headed toward the attic. When we got to the top of the stairs, and he opened the door, I couldn’t believe what I saw.

There, right in front of my very eyes, was my own room.

My father had plastered the walls and my mother had put up wallpaper. If I close my eyes, I can still see the pretty pattern with tiny pink and white flowers with a delicate green vine connecting them.

All my toys and dolls and favorite books were there, and there was even a brand new bed with beautiful new sheets and pillow cases and a beautiful new quilt, guaranteed to keep me warm at night.

It was almost too good to be true.

That’s what I think it will be like when we get to heaven. Jesus says, “In my father’s house, there are many rooms.”

I believe our dear friend Helen now has her very own room in heaven and as lovely as her room was here, and as happy as she was living here with you all, this new room is beautiful beyond her wildest imaginings.

I think it is our experience of 'heaven on earth' which prepares us to inhabit our heavenly rooms which are prepared for us by Jesus.

I’m going to ask Robert and Richard, Helen’s two sons, to come and tell a little bit of her earthly story before I tell you a little bit more of what I think might be Helen's heavenly story.

(Richard puts her life in context of historical events - born 45 years after the Civil War and a few years after the Wright Brothers flew their plane. Robert spoke of his mother's graduation from college (a huge landmark for a woman of that generation), and how she loved her work as a librarian, but always called her sons the 'lights of my life.' After they finished, I continued:)

I don’t know this for certain, and I can’t say this as a matter of actual fact, but I believe with all my heart that when Helen's time came, when she finally gave up her spirit, Jesus came to her. I believe she wiped away all her tears as Jesus stretched out his hand to her. I believe Helen took hold of the hand of Jesus and followed him to the room he had prepared for her in his Father’s house.

May we all hear the words of Jesus when he comes to us to say, "“It's okay. Don't worry. Dry your tears and take my hand. I've prepared a wonderful room for you."

Amen.

Thursday, August 07, 2008

Vision, Prayer, Projects and Dreams


One of the really wonderful things about Lambeth was the opportunity to network internationally.

Herb Gunn took this picture of me and Christina Rees, president of WATCH (Women and the Church), the UK equivalent of The Episcopal Women's Caucus, while we were at Lambeth.

Christina and I were "housemates" - sharing student housing with four other women who were part of the "Inclusive Church Network."

Christina is originally from Long Island but married a wonderful British bloke and has been living for the last two decades or so in England. Her accent is an interesting amalgam of "lung island" and Coventry (if you can imagine such a thing). Sometimes, listening to her just flat out made me giggle. Indeed, one of the most endearing things about Christina is that sometimes, she laughs right out loud about herself.

Christina and I shared a vision, a prayer, a project and more than a few hopes and dreams.

Our vision is simple but a challenge, given that we are reminded that the Anglican Communion is still in a "period of reception" of the "innovation" of the ordination of women. (Yes, I know, but it's true. Swear to God.)

So, our vision is that by Lambeth 2018 there will be women in all ordained orders in all provinces.

Yes, you heard me: By 2018, there will be women in all ordained orders in all provinces.

That is, no doubt, a tall order, given the fact that sexism and male privilege are still very much alive, even in England.

If you followed anything of the process for the British Synod vote to allow the appointment of women to the episcopacy (in the CofE, bishops are appointed,not elected), you understand that the process of accommodation of Anglo-Catholics might take a bit of a long haul.

Even so, I think our prayer is even more of a challenge than our vision:

That the women who are ordained, elected or appointed to the councils and corridors of institutional power and authority will be vehicles of the change and transformation necessary for the church to have greater integrity and authenticity as the Body of Christ.

We're talking systemic change here, not just changing the faces at the top. That will require lots and lots and lots of prayer.

In terms of projects, we are hoping for exchanges in pulpit, altar and See. That is, we are hoping that ordained women in all the provinces and from every continent will have an opportunity to have the experience of women preaching, presiding and leading.

We're hoping that women will be invited to exchange pulpits and altars with their male counterparts in places where the ordination or consecration of women is not yet allowed.

We're also hoping that women who are bishops might be able to exchange "sees" for a time with their brothers where women are not yet allowed to the episcopacy, so that folks get a chance to 'vive la difference'!

We suspect that, once a male bishop gets to experience a diocese where the leadership of women is as natural as breathing, he might go back to his province and become an advocate for change and transformation.

We trust that the experience of women in authority will help to change hearts and minds and we are committed to having our organizations facilitate that exchange of experiences.

Finally, we have some common, shared hopes, dreams and prayers:

We hope and pray that our young children and young adults will continue to be nurtured and challenged to grow more and more into the full stature of Christ.

We dream of a church in which they will have enough support and love to be able to take the risks of faith which the once and future church will need if it is to be relevant in the lives of her people.

We hope and pray that our church will formally repent of the sins of sexism as a manifestation of prejudice and patriarchy as a system of oppression.

We share a common dream that we might inspire our church to dismantle patriarchy and combat sexism where ever it is made manifest. We dream of an end to domestic violence and the rape or women and children as a weapon of war. We are convinced that once sexism is dismantled, the dismantling of the sin of heterosexism will soon follow.

Finally, we hope and pray that we can grow more fully into relationship with each other, despite the geographical boundaries that separate us.

We dream of a time when we might have increased opportunities to share our passion for the gospel, as well as more occasions to share our individual faith stories and the myriad of ways in which Jesus is alive in our lives, calling us to our various vocations, ministries and mission.

And, you thought Lambeth was just about bishops!

Wednesday, August 06, 2008

Life is good


At 3:30 this morning our fifth grandchild made his way into the world - right on schedule! Welcome

Mason James

8 pounds 91/2 ounces, 20 1/2 inches long

He joins big brother Maxx and little sister Melina and cousins McKenna and Abby.

No, that's not his picture. I'll post them as soon as I get them.

Mommy and Daddy, I'm told, are exhausted. Mason is doing just fine.

I suspect it will be this way for awhile.

Rejoice with us. Life is good.

Tuesday, August 05, 2008

Can we stay together?

Note: I think the way I'm handling my grief, at least at this point, is to stay up in my head. If I get too near my heart, I simply dissolve into a puddle of tears. There will be time soon enough for that. Right now, I still have pastoral work to do. So, when this and the question which follows in the next post came up on HOB/D (House of Bishops and Deputies listserv), I found that I simply had to respond. I hope this is helpful to some of you.)

The Question on HOB/D was: "Can we hold these disparate views and still respect each other and stay together? Or do we need to go separate ways?"


One of the reasons I became an Episcopalian/Anglican is for the very reason you state: that we can hold disparate views and still respect each other and stay together. If we can't, then we should leave Canterbury and go either to Rome or Geneva. Or, perhaps, Constantinople.

The WWAC seems to have caught a "nasty virus" in the last decade or so, which has challenged this very foundational concept of what it means to be in the Episcopal Church and Anglican Communion. Already, those who want us all to "talk alike and walk alike and think alike and speak alike and pray alike" have said that Canterbury is not the center of Anglicanism.

I read that as having such disparate views and not respecting the other that they have gone a separate way. That makes me sad, but I wish them Godspeed and a closer walk with the Jesus they know.

Ah, you are asking, but how is it that we can live together when our disagreements lead us to the point were, for example, what some believe as "insufficient matter" in terms of gender or "sinful" in terms of 'lifestyle' is being blessed, ordained or consecrated to the episcopacy?

My response is one I learned from Ted Mellor who once said, "You have the absolute right to swing your arms as wildly as you wish, but your right ends at the tip of my nose."

You can believe whatever you wish about my sexual orientation and who I call 'family' or who and how I love. However, that right ends when it comes to the pursuit and fulfillment of my vocation, raised up and tested by the community of faith and in accordance with the doctrine, discipline and canons of The Episcopal Church.

On reflection of my experience of Lambeth, I think we got two things wrong:

Inclusion and Unity. I'm in the process of organizing my fuller thoughts on this but I'll say this much in sum.

Inclusion is a crock. You can not include me. I can not include you. We are both already included by reason of our baptism. The household of God does not belong to you or me. It's God's house and either our membership begins with baptism or St. Paul is a liar and we are both apostate and heretical to exclude any of the baptized from any of the sacraments solely on the basis of their God-given attributes of gender, race, sexual orientation, etc.

You want orthodoxy? I got your orthodoxy right there.

Likewise, unity is a crock. I used to hear the high priestly pray of Jesus "that you may be one" as a call to institutional unity. From everything I read in scripture, Jesus didn't give two figs about institutional unity. Never had a temple of his own - never even attended services regularly. As one of my Confirmation Class kids once pointed out, where in scripture did Jesus even tithe? (Ya gotta love 'em, right?) What I hear Jesus asking is that we all be one "as God and I are one:. That speaks to me more of an intimacy in relationship than institutional unity.

The Lambeth Conference purported to be about institutional unity but, in fact, its design promoted intimacy in relationships. The bishops and their wives were set into small intimate groups in order to share the details of their lives of faith. Whatever institutional unity we will have been able to achieve because of Lambeth 2008 will be due to the fact that it was built on the foundation of intimate relationships where we know one another in our uniqueness and understand that "I am because you are."

This is the genius of classic Anglicanism which is radically orthodox, in my estimation. It's messy and difficult because it's emphasis is more on 'mutual bonds of affection' as opposed to rules and regulations.

If there is to be the truly modern innovation of something called an Anglican Covenant, it will come about because of our relationships in community which will name our reality - not list rules to follow and proscribe punitive measures carried out by a curia called The Faith and Order Commission if the rules are broken.

"That you all may be one" will only lead to institutional unity if we develop intimacy in our relationships as The Body of Christ.

And yes, there are some (I said some, not all) who want to punish, shame and blame those who disagree with this position. I didn't name them because I didn't think I had to, their positions being so blatant and obvious. They are convicted not by my words but by their own.

And yes,, my position of moral neutrality in terms of sexual orientation and moral behavior may be a "radical departure" from traditional teaching, but so is our current teaching on divorce and remarriage (the early 1970s), reproductive rights (the mid 1960s), the ordination of women (1977), our understanding of the immorality of slavery (for which only apologized in 2006), the shape of the world (for which the RC church apologized only in the last 20 years), a person's left-handedness (some on this list remember being shamed and retrained in elementary school), the origins of disease . . . do I really need to continue?

I said all of that to say this: Can we hold radically different beliefs and still stay together and respect each other? If we are traditional, radically orthodox Anglicans, the answer is a resounding, "Yes."

Who was at Lambeth?

Someone on HOB/D asked if there was a list of bishops who attended Lambeth. This was my answer which a few people have encouraged me to post here.

Riaza Butt, a religion reporter for the Guardian who happens to be Muslim, took the lead among others to get a list of those bishops who were in attendance. She defined 'persistence' and was rewarded with a list of those bishops who agreed to have their names published as being in attendance. If memory serves (and it does less and less these days), I think she got 650 but there were 'rumored' to be 670-something.

I suspect that list is available somewhere, but it will not necessarily be easy to find. And, to what purpose, it should be asked. Will that information be used for good or for ill - to celebrate or shame those who were in attendance or those who were not?

My sense is that the designers and coordinators of Lambeth Conference worked very hard to be in control of "the message". It has been argued that where we are in this turmoil is due, at least in part, because the church has not been in control of the message. The news media - and especially personal blogs - have fueled the fires of schism with speculation and innuendo. The Lambeth folk were very keen not to let this happen this time.

Oh, they did have their way on at least two occasions - the "statement" of the bishops of Sudan re: the "demand" for the resignation of the Bishop of NH was a comment during the press conference which (unfortunately) got more press than their actual (and very fine) Statement about the conditions in The Sudan.

The speculation of the Bishop Suffragan of NY about how many bishops at Lambeth are involved in domestic violence was another instance. That comment was harumphed by Ms. Butt in the Guardian as a statement of colonialism which it most certainly was not. It set off a firestorm which was much more damaging than anything Bishop Roskam actually said.

Those two incidences were enough to convince me, as frustrated as I was and we all were on the ground, that their tightly-controlled approach to the media was, perhaps an over-correction but an unfortunate necessity. It did not stop the wild speculation in some of the personal (not bishop's, for the most part) blogs, but that was not unexpected. I can only imagine what they'd have done with "real" news!

I, for one, think the design of the Conference had everything to do with the considerable lowering of the level of violence that I experienced in 1998. That was, in a word, dreadful. I, for one, am deeply grateful for the substantially lowered level of violence at Lambeth 2008.

One final note: I remember Martin Smith, formerly of SSJE, who, after Lambeth 1998, said something like what had happened there was like a negative picture on film (remember the old days, oh, about 5 years ago, before digital cameras were standard for everyone?), that needed to be developed once we got home.

I think Lambeth 2008 will be like that, too, but for very, very different reasons. It's still too soon to tell, but I think it's important to remember that Lambeth is a meeting for and by bishops in the WWAC. Much will be said in the religious press and personal blogs about what a waste of time and money it was. That's because THEY didn't get what they wanted out of it - which was sensational news that will sell their papers or boost their cause.

For my money, the most important aspect of the "fringe events" was the presence of the LGBT folk and their straight allies from Nigeria, Kenya, and Uganda. Some of them risked personal harm when they return home because of their truth telling. You can read about one example - a printed statement by Rose Ngeri which she personally handed out to African bishops and their wives - on my blog.

When Rose was asked if she feared reprisals she said, with a chilling calm, "Oh, they will just rape me, but they will torture and kill my brothers. Do you not understand? They will torture and kill my brothers. I have to do this." And so, she did.

(Update: For those who have asked, Rose returned to say that every single one of the bishops and their wives took her leaflet graciously and with a kind smile. When asked how this would affect her when she got home, she simply said, "God will provide." How's THAT for faith?)

Even one of the uber-orthodox reporters was visibly shaken by their witness and testimony. You could almost see the top of his head blow off when one of the women, a lawyer from Nigeria (who wore a small gold cross on her neck) said, "Homosexuality has always been in Africa. That has never been the question. It is Christianity that was imported here. It is Christianity- the Anglican Church - that was 'the foreign thing' brought to Africa."

I think Lambeth will be judged by the bishops to have been the most important event of many of their episcopacies, in terms of clarifying their role as bishops in their dioceses as well as part of a greater whole.

I think the relationship building which came out of the three day retreat, the daily bible studies, the plenaries, their daily Eucharist and worship and formal and informal discussions will be hard to measure in terms of hard data like resolutions or 'statements' onto which a certain number of bishops voted up or down, or any other mark of 'productivity'.

Isn't that the way in our local communities of faith, as well?

Monday, August 04, 2008

Lambeth Reactions

Note: This ENS article by Mary Frances Schjonberg is the best summary I've read of the Lambeth Conference.

Reactions to Lambeth Conference span the spectrum

By Mary Frances Schjonberg August 04, 2008
[Episcopal News Service, Canterbury]

The buses bearing the 2008 Lambeth Conference's 670 purple cassock-clad bishops had barely arrived at Canterbury Cathedral for the 18-day gathering's final Eucharist August 3 when reactions to the event and its final reflections document began to appear.

The reactions ranged across the spectrum of opinion, with some urging decisive action in concert with the comments made in the reflections document and some cautioning against making legislation out of a document that is a self-described narrative of the conference.

Noticeably quiet on that day was the Global Anglican Future Conference, which held a June gathering of conservative Anglicans and Episcopalians in Jerusalem. Its silence was noteworthy considering that the absence of the so-called GAFCON bishops is referenced in the introductory section of the reflections document.

Archbishop of Canterbury Rowan Williams said near the end of his final presidential address that "in the months ahead it will be important to invite those absent from Lambeth to be involved in these next stages" of the efforts to maintain the communion. "Much in the GAFCON documents is consonant with much of what we have sought to say and do, and we need to look for the best ways of building bridges here," he said.

Sydney Archbishop Peter Jensen, who emerged as a GAFCON leader during its June gathering in Jerusalem, said August 4 in a short news release that "our absence focused minds on the problems within the communion and spoke louder than our presence would have."

A two-sentence statement appeared August 4 on GAFCON's website, saying: "The Primates' Council of GAFCON will wish to study the outcome of the Lambeth Conference carefully and consult with those they are leading. They are meeting towards the end of August and will make their response following that meeting."

There was still a day to go before the reflections document was released when the bishops of Egypt, North Africa and the Horn of Africa issued a statement August 2 calling for "a spirit of mutual submission to prevail and for unity to be restored."

Bishops Mouneer Anis, Derek Eaton, and Andrew Proud said that the gathering had been a "most valuable opportunity to express our thoughts and concerns and to listen to the concerns of others." They called for movement on the Windsor continuation process, the Anglican covenant and the moratoria -- called for in the Windsor Report (in Section D) -- on authorizing public rites for blessing same-gender relationships, consecrating people involved in same-gender relationships and crossing diocesan and provincial borders to exercise episcopal ministry.

The three argue that the first two moratoria "pertain to central moral teaching while the last is a matter simply of administration and good order."

Anis, the primate of the Episcopal Church of Jerusalem and the Middle East, is also one of the signatories of a statement issued August 3 by the self-identified members of the Anglican global south.

The statement was issued from the Lambeth Conference, according to the text, and is currently also signed by bishops and primates Ian Ernest (Indian Ocean), Bernard Ntahoturi (Burundi), Dirokpa Balufuga Fidèle (Congo), John Chew (Southeast Asia), Stephen Than Myint Oo (Myanmar), Valentino Mokiwa (Tanzania), Daniel Deng Bul Yak (Sudan), and Justice Ofei Akrofi (West Africa), John Wilson Gladstone (South India) and Donald Mtetemela (Tanzania). The current version of the statement notes that the list of signers is being updated.

The signers said that they "stand in solidarity with all the faithful Bishops, Clergy and Laity in the United States and Canada and elsewhere who are suffering recrimination and hostility perpetrated upon them by their dioceses and/or national churches which have not unequivocally complied with the specific Windsor proposals required of them in full."

They said the communion "is at the probable brink of collapse" and that the May 2009 meeting of the Anglican Consultative Council (ACC) ought to endorse the proposed Anglican covenant. They called on the Lambeth Conference to give "clear endorsement and immediate implementation" of the Windsor Continuation Group's July 28 proposal for a pastoral forum.

The continuation group, charged with the implementation of the some of the Windsor Report's recommendations, proposed that the forum that would rapidly "engage theologically and practically with situations of controversy as they arise or divisive actions that may be taken around the Communion." The forum could "offer pastoral advice and guidelines." It could also develop a plan to hold "in trust" alternative Anglican groups that have attempted to organize people who disagree with the Episcopal Church's stance on the issues involved in the moratoria so that they can prepare "for their reconciliation within their proper provinces," the continuation group said.

While the reflections document says the idea of a pastoral forum was supported by many Lambeth bishops, it did not outline the implementation the statement signers called for. Williams said in his last presidential address that he would "look within the next two months for a clear and detailed specification for the task and composition of a pastoral forum." Williams did not say where that "specification" would come from, although the continuation group has said it will meet in the fall to consider what it heard from bishops at Lambeth.

The Global South leaders' statement also charges that "substantial theological voices outside of the Western world have not been present in the evening plenary sessions of the Lambeth Conference," calling it an example of the "continuing patronising attitude of the West towards the rest of the churches worldwide." The signers deem the perceived lack to be part of what they call "attempts to cause divisions and break the bonds between churches in the Global South," adding that "the realities in our churches are often misrepresented and misunderstood in the West."

The statement says that the Global South Primates' Steering Committee will meet soon to discuss "how to move the global Anglican Communion substantially and effectively forward." The signers pledge to work with "all orthodox groups in the United States of America and Canada: to listen together to what Lord Jesus says to his church today, to draw strength and insights from one another, and to take fresh initiatives in upholding and passing on the faith once delivered to the saints."

On the day after the conference, Diocese of California Bishop Marc Andrus described as "profound and generous"
Williams' suggestion in his final presidential address that "there will be some who cannot abide by these moratoria, and in this they signal that there are steps to deeper unity they cannot take; or it may be that they conceive of deeper unity in other ways."

Andrus said California would not abide by the moratorium on same-sex blessings but that he takes it "as incumbent on me and on us in the diocese to actively labor to both understand the position of those to whom that moratorium is important, and to convey the reality of our life together to the world."

Andrus echoed others' reactions when he noted that "the document is not legislation."

"We will pay close attention to it, but we must not reify the agreement points in it into laws, and we should resist interpretations that seek to employ those agreements as laws," he wrote.

On August 3, Integrity USA's Susan Russell warned of a similar tendency, urging bishops to "resist the temptation of those who will try to turn this descriptive document into a proscriptive edict."

She also challenged the Episcopal Church's House of Bishops to partner with the House of Deputies "to break the cycle of being bullied into bigotry and distracted from mission and ministry by those who would exclude us because of our commitment to the full inclusion of all the baptized in the Body of Christ."

"We look forward to General Convention 2009 and the opportunities we will have there to move the church further forward on the journey toward full inclusion," Russell continued.

"We remind our bishops that we cannot live up to our baptismal vows to respect the dignity of every human being if we tell some of them that they are good enough to arrange our flowers, play our organs, direct our choirs, teach our Sunday Schools, and lead our worship -- but not good enough to have their vocations affirmed and their relationships blessed," Russell said.

Referring to suggestions made during the conference that the proposed Anglican covenant and the moratoria might be ways that members of the communion might be generous towards each other, Russell argued that "there is nothing 'generous' about asking the LGBT faithful to bear the burden of unity of the Anglican Communion on their shoulders and there is no theological defense for sacrificing a minority of the baptized to the will of a majority."

Diocese of Chicago Bishop Jeffrey Lee said August 3 in a video log that he had come to understand "like never before" how physically dangerous it can be for some Anglicans to discuss homosexuality. He said he came "face-to-face with fellow believers who hold a view of Scripture that I cannot understand." Lee said that he did not get answers to the questions he asked them about how the issue of the full inclusion of homosexual persons can rise "to the level of saving [the] faith or should be the cause of the breaking of communion."

Before the reflections document was released on the afternoon of August 3, South Carolina Bishop Mark Lawrence, who later called Williams' comment about GAFCON "a crucial and gracious overture," told reporters that he had witnessed a "new prince" being born at the group's Jerusalem meeting.

"It was an awkward and messy birth," he said, reading from what he called his "morning meditation." Lawrence said he knew that his role is now to "hold together as much as I can for as long as I can that when he comes to his rightful place on St. Augustine's throne in Canterbury Cathedral he will have a faithful and richly textured kingdom."

Sunday, August 03, 2008

No matter what . . .


. . . Dave Walker always makes me laugh.

A Sisterhood of Mothers


I've been reflecting, this day, on my mother's life, my life as a mother and the life I lived for the past two weeks at Lambeth.

A dear friend just wrote a note of condolence to me. In it, she said, "I was rather delighted to see, from the comments to your blog, that the image of the sisterhood of mothers welcoming Lydia had come to others as well as to me."

I, too, have been delighted and comforted by this image. My mother has been brought out of the darkness of her human experience into the Light of Truth.

Now, she knows fully what she once knew only in part.

Now, she sees that what she had feared most about my life was what she, in fact, longed for most in her life. Now she is experiencing, beyond her wildest human imagination, love and acceptance for who she truly is, not that of institutional custom and cultural propriety.

While it is beyond my wildest imagination to know the fullness of that eternal bliss and heartbreaking joy, I have known glimpses of what this might be.

A Sisterhood of Mothers also surrounded me when the word came of my mother's death. There were six women living in the house which became our temporary residence while at Lambeth. We came from very diverse places on the theological, political, cultural and ecclesiological spectrum.

I think these differences can best be expressed by something Bette Middler once said: No matter the year, when the Crystal Ball drops on Times Square at New Year's Eve, it's still and always 1950 in London.

Some of the women couldn't understand the need for inclusive language when our community gathered for prayer. They looked at us with odd curiosity when some of us bitterly complained about the high level of male privilege in our group that called itself "The Inclusive Church Network", and how some of the women were actually enabling this behavior.

Not everyone was a biological mother, but everyone was a spiritual mother of the church - lay and ordained. This Sisterhood of Mothers came together in a most magnificent way in the hours of my need after my mother's death.

I am a grateful debtor to the countless ways, the thousands of random acts of kindness which they ministered unto me in my grief and sorrow. Despite our differences, they were the church, loving me unconditionally, giving me the strength and courage to persevere, beyond the expectations of institutional custom and cultural propriety.

In the midst of the emotional roller-coaster ride, this is, in fact, in a peculiar sort of way, part of what I experienced while at Lambeth.

Let me explain.

The model of this conference was decidedly different from all the others. The emphasis was not on resolutions but on relationships. The process was not about making declarations but about deepening dedication to the bonds of mutual affection, despite our diversity, that have always held us together. It wasn't about what was on the surface but rather, that which is contained in the depth - indeed, in the very heart - of the Anglican Communion.

In many ways, the unspoken goal of Lambeth was to place us all into the sacred womb of Mother Church, that we all might drink in and be nourished by the placental waters of our baptismal faith.

While there, we struggled to listen to the voice of God as I imagine a fetus might listen to but not yet fully understand the voices just beyond the womb.

I have an image here of the LGBT Africans and North Americans who bravely told their stories on film and in front of those straight allies and a few conservative reporters who came to listen - and hear - what they had to say.

I asked one ultra-conservative reporter who sat in front of me what he thought of the night's presentation. He struggled to find the words to respond. After a few moments of pregnant consideration, he said a most remarkable thing. He said, "I am just now beginning to hear the complexity and the contours of this issue."

I experienced that statement as an acknowledgment of his emerging awareness that he did not posses the whole Truth.

Another image from Lambeth: while we were yet in the darkness and security of the womb, we squinted our eyes to see the emerging Light, some of us hurt and blinded by its brilliance.

I have an image here of the report of the African woman, the wife of a bishop, who stood up in her group after the dramatic reading in Second Samuel of the Rape of Tamar. She demanded, in a very loud voice, to know what was this abomination that had been read to them. How dare anyone claim that 'this filth' was part of sacred scripture.

When her bishop husband and some of the other brother African bishops heard her loud cries of protest, they joined her. How dare 'this filth' be brought into their sacred space, they demanded to know.

When they had been given repeated enough assurances that this story had, in fact, come from the very scripture they claim to hold as having primacy in their lives, but they did not know, it is reported that more than 100 of them walked out of the room in protest. I can only imagine the pain of their humiliation.

It is a documented medical fact that when one has been blind and then regains one's sight, the first rays of light can be very, very painful.

And yet, it is reported that a few of the Sisterhood of Mothers came among them to talk about the abuse of power as documented in scripture and to talk about how rape is used as a weapon of war in their very own homeland.

It is said that among some of them, at least, there were tears of relief that the truth was finally being told, and the hope of the gospel was revealed like a thousand twinkling stars in the eyes of those who had once sat in darkness and despair.

The one word which fell from the lips of almost everyone on either side and the middle aisle of the Anglican Church gathered at Lambeth Conference was this:

Unity.

The great high priestly prayer of Jesus before his execution and death on the cross was that "we all be one" as Jesus and God are one.

I suppose it's not surprising that the church-as-institution hears this as a plea for unity in the church and among the Christian churches as they are constituted across the spectrum of Orthodox, Catholic, Anglican, and Protestant expressions of the faith in the Triune God.

Although I can not - will not - speak for my sisters who gathered at Lambeth, on reflection I hear the prayer of Jesus in a very different way.

I don't think Jesus was calling for institutional unity. I do believe Jesus was calling for this:

Intimacy.

I hear the plea of Jesus for us to be in close relationships of intimacy. As different and distinct as Jesus was from God and yet the two were one, I do believe the prayer that we 'all be one' means that we be in intimate relationship with each other despite our theological and ecclesiological differences.

Our ancient sister, a mother of mysticism, Julian of Norwich, used the term "Mother Jesus." When our Presiding Bishop, Katharine Jefferts Schori, used this term at General Convention 2006 during her first sermon after having been elected, a fire storm of controversy broke out.

Indeed, three days after this sermon, the rector and vestry of a major church in Texas voted to leave The Episcopal Church, claiming that this, THIS, was the 'last straw.'

I think the Lambeth Conference makes it infinitely clear that while patriarchy is far from dead, the feminization of the church has not only begun, it is making its indelible mark on the church-as-institution.

The Sisterhood of Mothers has awakened from a millennia of slumber to rouse Mother Church into full acceptance of the diversity of God's whole creation which God has declared from the beginning as "good."

Despite the ABC's insistence of a moratoria, the establishment of greater intimacy in relationships among the bishops attending Lambeth will make it more difficult for the incursions of other bishops into other dioceses to continue in the way AMiA, GAFCCON and the ACN have done in the past.

Likewise, it will make it difficult for the North American and (oh, by the way Church of England and other Western European Churches) to ignore and withhold blessing the intimacy of committed LGBT relationships which they have blessed in the past.

While it will 'strain the bonds of affection' which have been strengthened and nourished during Lambeth, when these same dioceses continue to bless the covenants LGBT people make or to consecrate LGBT priests who have been duly elected to the episcopacy, I do believe the call to intimacy which has brought bishops who have 'once been strangers but now are friends' will prevail over the desire for institutional unity.

Indeed, I do believe that we have entered into a time of unofficial but nonetheless de facto 'Reception' the full inclusion of all the baptized in all the sacraments and sacramental rites.

And, that gives me hope that was, heretofore, unimaginable to me.

Some of you will dismiss these words as those of a woman who is still in the throes of grief. And, you would be correct about my emotional and spiritual status.

Others of you will worry that I've gone right round the bend and over the side, into The Abyss. Not to worry. I'm right where I need to be: in the process of healing from loss and trying to make sense of it all.

As my brother Mad Priest is of't want to say, "Of course, I could be wrong."

I only know this much to be true: The Realm of God is made of such intimacy in relationships. The church is charged in its mission from Christ Jesus to usher the Realm of God into the reality of our present lives.

My mother now lives in the fullness of this reality for eternity. Thanks be to God.

I have come to believe that the Anglican Communion is in the birth process and the Sisterhood of Mothers are become her midwives, gently guiding us on the path where we might find our way into the mission of Christ; for it is there we may be more intimately and relationally one despite the status of our institutional unity.

Thanks be to God.

Saturday, August 02, 2008

Whitstable at eventide


Thank you all so very much for your notes of condolence and prayer on the sudden death of my mother.

The unexpected nature of her death and the swiftness of her funeral have combined with the intensity of the experience of Lambeth and the lingering effects of jet lag to leave me feeling emotionally drained and spiritually depleted.

I don't think I am yet fully in my body and soul. I am grateful for the opportunity of this day to rest and the promise the day holds, as it stretches before me without a set agenda, to begin the process of healing.

One observation I'll share with you - as dysfunctional as my family of origin has been (and my family originally helped to define the word 'dysfunctional'), we look like a scene from 'Ozzie and Harriet' as compared with the once-upon-a-decade episode of My Big Fat Anglican Family Reunion.

Not as much daily drama and no costume department.

I trust you understand and forgive my not responding to each one of your individual emails, voice mail messages and notes left here.

That's not a reflection on the individual importance of your notes to me or the significance of the solace to my soul, but speaks more to the state of my emotional and spiritual energy level.

The image of the state of my heart and soul is one that I happened to capture my last evening in the UK: Low tide at Whitstable at sunset.

I am blessed to know you and to have received your prayers and support and love.

Of such, I believe with my whole heart, is the Realm of God.