Come in! Come in!

"If you are a dreamer, come in. If you are a dreamer, a wisher, a liar, a Hope-er, a Pray-er, a Magic Bean buyer; if you're a pretender, come sit by my fire. For we have some flax-golden tales to spin. Come in! Come in!" -- Shel Silverstein

Sunday, July 13, 2008

A Baptismal Love Letter: Taylor Grace


“Hear the parable of the sower . . .” Matthew 13:1-9, 18-23
July 13, 2008 – Pentecost IX
The Episcopal Church of St. Paul, Chatham
(the Rev’d Dr.) Elizabeth Kaeton, rector and pastor

Dear Taylor,

What a delight to have your baptism today! You hold the distinction of being the 1001 person on record to be baptized at St. Paul’s Church. That is significant on several levels, none the least of which is that this is your ‘family church.’

Your mother and your mother’s parents have a long history of membership in this church, back when it was affectionately known as “The little white church,”

Indeed, your mother was baptized here on June 13, 1974 and, while you are #1001, she holds the distinction of being #582 in the parish register of baptisms.

So, even though you don’t live close enough to this church at this time to be a member of this church, we’re still baptizing you here today.

This church has been important to your mother’s family for several generations. I hope, one day, it will be important to you.

The gospel lesson about the parable of the seed is a most appropriate one for me to explain the relationship a family can have with a church which, over the years and succeeding generations, can come to have deep meaning beyond mere nostalgia and romanticism.

Taylor, I want you to know that when your mother was still pregnant with you, she called me about your baptism. Soon after she explained the reason for her call, she began to talk about her time as a child here at St. Paul’s.

She had very fond memories of Christmas Pageants and learning what it takes to serve as an acolyte and carrying the torch candles just so.

She remembered running through the Parish Hall and having one of the parents scoop her up and sternly asking her to walk . . .walk . . .walk so she didn’t fall and hurt herself (somethings never change).

She remembered learning about her faith in Confirmation Class and then the day the bishop came to the church for the Sacramental Rite of Confirmation.

At first, you could hear in her voice that she wanted to convince me that she was a bona fide member of St. Paul’s so wouldn’t deny her the opportunity to have you baptized here.

And, yes, you could also hear her wax nostalgic for the good old days here at St. Paul’s. The more she spoke, however, the more you could hear in her voice that she knew this was the right thing to do.

That it was, in fact, important to baptize you here – for you, for her, for your father and brother, for your grandmother and the rest of your family. Slowly, she came to realize that St. Paul’s was her spiritual home.

We often talk about “roots” – putting down roots somewhere to make a home, or having roots firmly planted in a place far from where we actually live that will always be home. I have a “church home” at St. John the Evangelist in Boston where worked for two and a half years, as well as The Cathedral of St. Luke in Portland, Maine, where I was received into the Episcopal Church and which sponsored me for ordination.

Churches are like that. They are the place where the seeds of faith, the words of Holy Scripture and our call to community in Christ are scattered. The community that is here, Taylor, and how we live the way of Christ as we know it in Holy Scripture are part of the roots that are invisible in your soul.

These seeds were planted in your soul before you were even born, because a seed had already been planted in your mother’s soul and her mother’s soul before her. Those seeds grew and put down roots and they have borne much great fruit.

The seeds are not planted in soil but in the human soul. They are nourished by the waters of Baptism and fed by the sacrament of Eucharist. They are sustained by the experience of re-living and re-enacting the story of Christ – of his birth during the Christmas Pageant, his life and death during Holy Week and walking the Stations of the Cross, and his resurrection in the glorious celebration of Easter Day.

These are the things that bind you here, Taylor, you and your brother and your family. The seeds of Scripture and Christian community that your parents and godparents are responsible for tending over the years – to make certain that you learn about the stories of who God is and why Jesus was sent to live among us, and how the Holy Spirit works in our lives now, and constantly reveals God’s presence in us and in the world in the future.

Dawn and Robert are not just here for the one-day honor of being your godparent. They are here today to make a lifetime commitment of tending the seeds: the Word of God implanted you as a new member of the Community of Christ.

They are responsible for nourishing the roots of your faith, so that you make grow, as the prayer in our Baptismal liturgy petitions, into” the full stature of Christ”.

The work of watering and tending your faith will be taken on by your parents and Godparents and your community of faith until you come to the day of your Confirmation, the day when you take these vows and promises as your own responsibility, and you take your own unique place in Christian community.

That place may be here, eventually, but it will probably be in another church, in another place, with another Christian community. Not to worry. We don’t just say, “We believe in one Lord, one hope, one faith, one baptism.” We really mean it. Your membership is not only here, but wherever you go.

Indeed, your membership in the community of saints is not just about here and now, but also in the great by and by – with all your relatives who loved this church and now rest eternally with Jesus. That’s part of the mystery of planting the seeds of faith deep in the good soil of your human soul.

Just know, Taylor, that no matter where you go, no matter where you happen to find yourself, no matter where you’ve been or who you think you’ve become, this place will always be your spiritual home.

Home has been described as the place where, when you go there, they have to let you in. And, rest assured, we always will.

Amen.

Saturday, July 12, 2008

Contentment


It's another beautiful day in the neighborhood. The fish are jumping and the sun is high and already so hot there's a haze all around its yellow-white orb.

The fishermen have been chugging out on their boats since about 5:30 this morning. You can almost feel their excitement about what they might catch today as they tend to their rods and reels and nets.

"Looks like a good day for fishin'" I called out to one of them.

"Don't get much better," he replied with a huge grin.

There aren't too many of us who get up in the morning to go to work and look forward with great anticipation and excitement for what the day will bring.

For many people, work is a means to an end. It puts food on the table and a roof over their heads, but not much more. It is back-breaking and soul-depleting, with no hope for respite until, perhaps, retirement when social security and a part time job at WalMart or as the night janitor at Papa Gino's gives you the means to take an occasional guided tour bus trip to Atlantic City or The Grand Ole Opry, or Washington, DC with other retirees.

For others, it goes beyond that to the kind and quality of food you put on your table and the opulence of the roof on the house in a particularly exclusive neighborhood where you park your special edition automobile after you've driven your kids to their excellent (if not private) school. It doesn't make your work any more meaningful, but it does make it more tolerable.

Well, most days, anyway.

I had a conversation the other day with one of the Baymen who was picking up a few supplies at "The Bait Shoppe" next to the little Mom and Pop place where I pick up my coffee and newspaper in the morning.

Can I just say that it is still more than a little disconcerting to know that the same guy who makes my coffee is also the one who runs The Bait Shoppe with the large sign out front that happily declares, "Worms! Fresh Worms!" right next to the sign on the Convenience Store in a similar style that says, "Coffee! Fresh, Hot Coffee."

Maybe that's why I always smell my coffee before I drink it.

I said to him, "You really love your work, don't you?"

"Yup," he said in that way that let me know that I'm not quite an idiot but politely enough to give me the very clear message that he wasn't about to get into a conversation about the obvious.

"It looks like hard work," I said.

"Yup," he smiled, probably thinking to himself, "Okay, she's really an idiot."

"What is it that you love about it," I asked, figuring at this point, what did I have to lose? I mean, he already thought I was a idiot.

"Well, I do okay," he said. "I'm not rich but my wife and my kids are okay." Then, he gave a sigh and, thinking that he'd put an end of the conversation said, "I'm content."

He obviously had no idea who he was talking to.

"Content?" I asked. I was intrigued by the word.

"Yup," he said, now no doubt thinking, "Hubboy! I gotta get me outta he-ya."

"You know," I pressed, "not too many people can say that about their work."

He turned and looked at me, resigned, perhaps, to set me straight. "Well, it's like this. The wife gets at me all the time cuz I don't go to church with her on Sunday. Says it's not a good example for the kids."

He spit out some liquid made brownish-yellow from the chewing tobacco under the front of his bottom lip before he continued.

"But, I look at it this way: I get to be with God every day. When I'm out there, fishing, making a living, I'm also real close to God. I pray everyday when I'm out there. And not just words. I talk with God. Tell 'im what I need. Ask 'im to be generous. And, he is. You know?"

"So, yeah. I'm content. I got the best job in the world. I'm not rich and I ain't never gonna be rich, but it's okay. It provides for my family and brings me close to God. It don't get much better than that."

"Yup," he said as he spit on the ground again, "Content. I'm content."

I smiled and thanked him as I offered a handshake. He seemed surprised and then pleased as he took my hand in his and then looked me in the eye and studied me for a few minutes.

"You're content too, ain't cha?"

"Yup," I said.

And we both laughed as he shook his head and got into his car and drove away.

Funny, isn't it? How we can recognize in others what we don't necessarily see in ourselves.

Contentment.

I wouldn't have used that word, but that, in fact, is what I am.

Content.

I've got the best job in the world. I work hard and often don't have a "daily catch" to show form my labor. I'm not rich, and never will be, but I do okay. It provides for my family and I get to talk with God every day.

And you know, it just doesn't get much better than that.

Except, perhaps, for a Bayman.

Friday, July 11, 2008

It's a beautiful day in the neighborhood



This is sunrise this morning on the marsh just before the bay.

It's an incredibly beautiful day.

I'm going to the beach.

My reclining beach chair/back pack is filled with lotion, lunch and a towel.

The ending of "Anna Karenina" calls and she's simply irresistible.

Cya later, alligator.

Thursday, July 10, 2008

Susan Russell - number 34 for the Telegraph

But, number one in our hearts (who also, BTW, beat out Kendall Harmon (36) and Ephriam Radner (50).

Telegraph (UK)

The 50 most influential figures in the Anglican Church: 40-31
Last updated: 8:37 PM BST 10/07/2008

With the Lambeth Conference, the Anglican communion’s landmark summit, beginning next week, The Sunday Telegraph has compiled the Lambeth Power List, a countdown of the most influential figures in the worldwide Church.

Have your say: Who should be on the list

31 Barry Morgan - Archbishop of Wales

An old friend of the Archbishop of Canterbury, Barry Morgan succeeded Rowan Williams when his fellow Welshman moved to England.

Urbane and amiable, he has been one of the more diplomatic voices on the liberal wing and has played a quiet but crucial role in the row over homosexuality.

He serves on the Primates Standing Committee of the Anglican communion - a very influential decision-making body - and was also a member of the Lambeth Commission, which produced the Windsor Report that tried to solve the crisis in the Church.

However, he has opposed plans for an Anglican Covenant, arguing that it would lead to one voice on controversial issues, such as homosexuality, which members would have to sign up to or leave.

32 Jane Williams - theologian

A highly respected theologian in her own right, Jane Williams will be in charge of the 'Spouse's programme' at this month's meeting of Anglican Bishops in Canterbury.

Before her husband's translation from Wales to Canterbury she regularly crossed the Severn Bridge to teach at the evangelical theological college, Trinity Bristol. She now works as a visiting lecturer at King's College London. She and Rowan have been married since 1981 and have a son and daughter.

33 Philip Giddings - convener of Anglican Mainstream

From lecturing on politics at Reading University, to engaging in church politics, Philip Giddings is a highly experienced member of the Church of England's bureaucratic machine.

As vice chair of the House of Laity on General Synod and a member of the Archbishops' Council, he is one of the most well-placed evangelicals in the Church.

Despite being convener and one of the main spokespeople for Anglican Mainstream - the evangelical campaigning group that evolved out of the Bishop of Reading crisis - his opinions tend to carry weight, making him a key voice for traditionalism within the Church of England.

34 Susan Russell - Integrity, USA

Always in the eye of the storm, Susan Russell, a lesbian priest, is the consummately professional spin doctor for the gay rights organisation, Integrity. As an associate cleric at the leading liberal church All Saints, Pasadena, she is pressing ahead with gay marriages after the Californian Supreme Court decision to legalise them.


35 Paul Handley - editor, Church Times

The well-connected editor of the leading Anglican Newspaper, Church Times, Paul Handley has steered the publication, known affectionately by traditionalists as 'Jezebel's Trumpet', to a liberal stance on most key questions facing the Church of England.

Blogging recently from the recent conference of conservative bishops in Jerusalem, he pleaded for understanding among western liberals for their views.

36 Kendal Harmon - blogger

Of all the many conservative Anglican blogs, Kendal Harmon's 'Titusonenine' (from the biblical verse, "He must hold firmly to the trustworthy message...") is perhaps the least prone to flame wars.

Harmon, canon theologian of the diocese of South Carolina, asks those posting comments to refer to liberals and conservatives in more neutral terms as 'reappraises' and 'reasserters' and bans personal attacks.

His website has proved a valuable resource to conservative Anglicans in recording developments in the Church for years and has built a large network of readers.

The theologian is also one of the key strategists for the US Church's embattled conservative wing.

37 Bob Duncan - Bishop of Pittsburgh

Threatened by the US Church with deposition for moves to separate his diocese from them over homosexuality, Bishop Duncan is widely recognised as the main leader of US conservatives. However, he faces an uncertain future after a liberal grouping in his diocese filed a lawsuit to protect diocesan assets, and the House of Bishops looks certain to strip him of his position in October. He is determined to press on with a 'realignment' of Anglican Christianity which could see him appointed by Global South bishops as 'Archbishop' of an alternative Anglican province in North America.

38 Michael Poon - Singapore theologian

An articulate spokesperson for a moderate theological approach to divisions between the 'Global South' conservatives of the Anglican Communion and the western Churches, Poon appeals for a cautious approach to attempts to 'realign' the Anglican Communion by more belligerent factions. He deplores the dangers of a false gospel if the Anglican Communion is "no longer dependent on patient face-to-face encounters".

He is director of CSCA, the mission research arm of Trinity Theological College, Singapore

39 Ian Earnest - Primate of the Indian Ocean, Chairman of the Council of Anglican Provinces in Africa (CAPA)

Based in Mauritius, Archbishop Earnest, represents a small Church in comparison to Nigeria, Uganda and South Africa, yet his chairmanship of CAPA gives him a considerable influence over troubled relationships between the Churches of the West and the developing world. Chosen as a member of the Covenant Design Group, which was set up to restructure how the Anglican Communion operates, many believe that the Archbishop of Canterbury regards him as a leader who can mediate in the current crisis.

40 Kathy Grieb - Episcopal Church theologian,

A theologian from Virginia Theological Seminary, Kathy Grieb was chosen as the sole American representative on the Covenant Design group, an initiative aimed at finding agreement on how Anglicans can avoid potentially damaging splits in the future. She has expressed doubts about a process that could be potentially damaging to The Episcopal Church, but argues: "It is important for the entire Anglican Communion to go forward as a group and not to split into two different versions of Anglican Communion."

Lambeth Power List: 50-41

Story from Telegraph News:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2280796/The-50-most-influential-figures-in-the-Anglican-Church-40-31.html
Information appearing on telegraph.co.uk is the copyright of Telegraph Media Group

Why Walk When You Can Fly

A Musical Meditation for Lambeth from Mary Chapin Carpenter

In this world there's a whole lot of trouble, baby
In this world there's a whole lot of pain
In this world there's a whole lot of trouble
But a whole lot of ground to gain
Why take when you could be giving, why watch as the world goes by
It's a hard enough life to be living, why walk when you can fly

In this world there's a whole lot of sorrow
In this world there's a whole lot of shame
In this world there's a whole lot of sorrow
And a whole lotta ground to gain
When you spend your whole life wishing, wanting and wondering why
It's a long enough life to be living, why walk when you can fly

In this world there's a whole lot of cold
In this world there's a whole lot of blame
In this world you've a soul for a compass
And a heart for a pair of wings
There's a star on the far horizon, rising bright in an azure sky
For the rest of the time that you're given, why walk when you can fly

How many women in the episcopacy does it take . . .

. . . . to raise up the cries of possible schism?


The correct answer is:

TWENTY-FOUR


Australia 2

New Zealand 2 (one retired)

Canada 4

USA 15 (three retired)

Cuba 1


At the 1998 Lambeth Conference, there were 11 women who were bishops. That's a net gain of 13 which is not exactly "galloping progress."

Oh, and by the way, the estimate that the earliest possible time we'll see a woman appointed bishop in the Church of England is:

2014.


Like I said, not exactly 'galloping progress', but enough to cause some old men to rattle their sabers and others to threaten schism.

My, my, my.

When you examine the figures for the USA, you see that there were 8 American women who were bishops in 1998. When you subtract the three who have retired, that's a net gain of 10 women in 10 years.

Wow! That kind of progress just makes a body dizzy, right?

It's absolutely amazing what terrible fear and foreboding can be struck in the hearts of some (certainly not all) men by the presence of two dozen women in purple shirts, and the threat of more a whole six years from now in England.

If you then look at how many women there are who are bishop suffragans as opposed to diocesan bishops, you see that sexism is alive and well and carefully enshrined in the church.

The stained glass ceiling hasn't exactly been shattered - it's just been cracked enough to let a little light in. Thanks be to God!

You can find more information here.

P.S. Yes, that's a picture of John Knox, founder of the Presbyterian Church in Scotland, who openly ridiculed Mary, Queen of Scots from the pulpit. He also strongly influenced Puritanism, and successfully moved the understanding of authority from "princely" powers to individualism.

Gee, any of this sounding even vaguely familiar?

Flying Lessons for Lambeth

I've been watching, in no small amount of awe, the Purple Martins who have taken residence in our little bird house by Llangollen, our wee cottage on Rehoboth Bay.

Let me say quickly, I am not a "bird watcher" per se. Rather, I watch birds.

It's hard not to when you live off a marsh on the Bay.

I love watching the Snowy White Egrets stalk their breakfast in the morning. They hold a pose in perfect stillness until it's time to strike. Amazing.

Even more amazing, still, is when the Blue Heron appear.

There is something magical, mystical, in fact, about these birds. They look prehistoric - like something out of Jurasic Park.

They have an awkward, almost comical way of preparing to fly, yet, when they spread their magnificent wings and are airborne, they are positively elegant.

A few friends who have stayed here left us a little booklet of "Delaware Birds" - it could be titled, "Birdwatching for Idiots" - and every time I spot one of the birds, I run to it and circle their picture.

I have seen Green Herons, Greater Yellowlegs and Great Egrets. There are Double-crested Cormorants, Blue-winged Teal ducks and a Black Scoter who float by and visit from time to time, as well as a Pied-billed Grebe.

Last year the Blue-winged Teal ducks set up a nest near our storage shed and it was thrilling - absolutely thrilling - to watch the mama duck sit on her hatchlings while the papa duck marched protectively back and forth.

But, it's the Purple Martins I've been watching carefully. I think we're on the second generation this season.

If you look carefully, you can see one of them on the top floor and several more on the first floor of the "Bird Condo" in our yard.

They first started to return to the condo in late April. I was here to see the first generation make their debut, but sadly, I missed their flying lessons.

I mean, I do have a day job.

The babies and females are not as "purple" as the older males. You can see the difference in this close up.

They don't look very distinguished when you see them flying in the air, but when you get close up, they are positively magnificent.

The song they sing when they are flying is also very different from the one they sing when they are home.

When I was here last week, the lessons began in earnest.

First, one of the parents or older birds flies out from the condo to a point over the marsh and then flies back again. S/he does this several times, over and over, retracing the route and then returning to squawk at the fledgelings.

Then, suddenly, one of the babies ventures out. Head down, wings up, like a fighter.

"Too fast, too fast," I whisper under my breath from behind the window on our sun porch. And, as if one of them hears me, an older bird flies out and guides the airborne cadet back to the condo.

Whew! A good but very scary first try.

In another five minutes or so, the older bird repeats the lesson, and another fledgeling (I really can't tell if it's the same or even exactly how many of them are in the condo), tries his/her wings.

Over and over the pattern repeats itself, until, by the next day, there are small flying black specks over the marsh, zooming back and forth between that unmarked but very clear midpoint and back again.

In one short week, the babies have become old pros. They fly over the house and around the deck, now adding a song to their flight pattern. Soon, they will be off to start their own home in their own condo.

And, so it goes.

I've been hearing the words of a song by Mary Chapin Carpenter as I've watched the Purple Martins flying this morning. I doubt very much it's the tune they sing when they're flying, but I'm betting the words are pretty close.

I think the image of the Purple Martins learning to fly, and this song and these words are the most important things to pack and take with me when I go to Lambeth next week.

It's certainly the image and the prayer I'm sending to my colleagues who are already there, and those who are preparing to leave this week end.

Let us pray:

In this world there's a whole lot of trouble, baby
In this world there's a whole lot of pain
In this world there's a whole lot of trouble
But a whole lot of ground to gain
Why take when you could be giving, why watch as the world goes by
It's a hard enough life to be living, why walk when you can fly

In this world there's a whole lot of sorrow
In this world there's a whole lot of shame
In this world there's a whole lot of sorrow
And a whole lotta ground to gain
When you spend your whole life wishing, wanting and wondering why
It's a long enough life to be living, why walk when you can fly

In this world there's a whole lot of cold
In this world there's a whole lot of blame
In this world you've a soul for a compass
And a heart for a pair of wings
There's a star on the far horizon, rising bright in an azure sky
For the rest of the time that you're given, why walk when you can fly

Wednesday, July 09, 2008

WSJ: A Bishop Who Happens to be a Woman

A tip of the baretta to RevBoy who, even on vacation, is on top of the news.

The Right Rev. Catherine Roskam -- the fourth woman ever to be consecrated -- discusses the rise of female leadership in the Anglican Communion

By EMILY FLITTER
Wall Street Journal July 9, 2008 4:20 p.m.

A day after the Church of England's governing body voted to allow women to be consecrated as bishops, the Right Rev. Catherine Roskam was headed to the Lambeth Conference, the periodic convention of bishops from the Anglican Communion that has, since 1948, occurred once a decade.

Since the last Lambeth Conference in 1998, a gay bishop has been ordained along with a handful of women, one of whom was elected in 2006 to the highest position of the Episcopal Church of the United States.

Bishop Roskam, who holds the title of Bishop Suffragan of the Episcopal Diocese of New York -- she oversees Episcopal congregations in the Hudson-Valley suburbs north of New York City -- and is the fourth woman ever to be consecrated, reflected on the rise of female leadership in the 77 million-member Anglican Communion. Edited excerpts from her interview with the Wall Street Journal follow.

* * *

WSJ: I've caught you on your way to the airport as you head out to the Lambeth Conference. Given the controversy over the Episcopal Church of the United States' election of a woman to its highest post -- presiding bishop -- are you surprised to be going there at all?

Bishop Roskam: I would have been very surprised if we had not been invited. We were invited in 1998. I was one of the first 11 women to be there in 1998.

The first place I'm going when I get there is the women in leadership conference. I expect that to be a very positive experience and I hope that we who are women bishops can be of support and help to the women there.

I expect when we get to Lambeth we'll be very well received. [In 1998,] I was told there were about 50 bishops that would cross the street when a woman bishop was approaching, but with 850 bishops around it was hard to figure out who was crossing the street for what reason. This year, it'll be gathering of friends.

WSJ: You were an actress before you entered the Church. Can you describe that career arc?

Bishop Roskam: Acting…I loved acting. And in a lot of ways, theater is a calling. It takes a lot of dedication and a subordination of one's own ego to the dedication of the artistic good.

When I was a little girl I wanted to be a priest but that was impossible. So I went into theater instead. Then when it looked like it would be possible, in 1979 and 1980, I began to just kind of feel a tug. I began to study at seminary. I was ordained in 1984.

WSJ: In the years since you first entered the Church, how have congregants' receptions of you changed?

Bishop Roskam: I am the first woman consecrated that didn't have protests at her consecration. And no one has had protests since then. But those before me -- the first three women -- did have protests. In fact Barbara Harris had three separate protests, and it was a big issue, they wanted her to wear a bullet-proof vest and she refused. The threats were numerous and not of the same voice.

But the fact that there are 24 women in the Communion should make it easier for the women in England. We're going to keep those women in our prayers.

WSJ: What is the biggest challenge the women leaders in Britain's Anglican Church will face?

Bishop Roskam: Their system is very different -- bishops are appointed there. In terms of the gender issue it's much better to be in a church where a bishop is elected. Then you know the majority of the people there really want to have a woman bishop. I think one of the dangers might be that a woman could be appointed in a place where the majority didn't want a woman bishop.

WSJ: You use the phrase "woman bishop," which seems to have a specific sentiment attached to it. How is having women entering the clergy really felt by the congregants and leadership?

Bishop Roskam: It's a good point, because I have to say in my own diocese I am not a "woman bishop." I don't even feel like a "woman bishop" in our synod [a governing body made up of clergy and laity in a diocese], I am just a bishop who happens to be a woman.

I'm in my thirteenth year of consecration -- at the beginning, the newspapers were filled with the phrase "woman bishop." How it changes over time is that people encounter the ministries of bishops who are women and it ceases to be an issue.

There's a great furor of course in certain areas over women entering the leadership of the Anglican Communion but if you go to churches here or in Africa or England you'll see churches are made up of [about] 70% women so it's natural that women would want to be in the leadership.

The writer of "The Red Tent" said men don't tell women's stories, and that's really right. And we need to tell our stories in places of power. Because women and children are the people who suffer in many [poverty-stricken] places the most. I think it's time for us to be in every possible leadership position and not only be in the few.

WSJ: Has being a woman ever helped you specifically in your role as a bishop?

Bishop Roskam: I don't like to talk in generalizations, but I do think that women go about creating community and making connections in a different sort of way. It's a relational kind of ministry and it's not just one-on-one. Women have this great gift of seeing the range of ministries and parishes in a diocese because they're in a different church every Sunday and they begin to make the connections -- it can be very catalytic, making those connections. I think women do do that. I think some men do it too.

I think women network well in general -- there, I've just made a generalization! But I do, that's sort of the way we get things done. We don't do things in the abstract, we're more likely to get things done because we know somebody who knows somebody and we can pull them together and get things cooking.

WSJ: Can you offer any advice to those who want to follow in your path?

Bishop Roskam: It takes some time to be formed as a bishop. It doesn't all come when the other bishops lay hands on you at your consecration. It can take three years before we grow into this wonderful vocation where it begins to feel comfortable and familiar.

I think the hard part for women is when they come up against people who think they're not ordained -- that is difficult and it can be very humiliating. I deal with it with prayer. I remember that Jesus was humiliated at the end. I take that for my strength.

WSJ: Who has treated you as if you weren't ordained?

Bishop Roskam: I've never experienced it from a layperson. I've only experienced it from clergy and a handful of bishops, most of whom are outside of our church. It's not a very comfortable place to be.

WSJ: What are the ecumenical implications of accepting women leaders in Anglican Communion?

Bishop Roskam: I think the other bodies have already come to terms with the fact that women have been ordained. I think people will think it's a great sign of hope.

Write to Emily Flitter at emily.flitter@wsj.com

Veritas Vos Liberabit


Thanks to Ann, a veritable unending source of all sort and manner of things.

(Click on the image to enlarge. Don't you sometimes wish that were true of all images?)

You can find this cartoon here.

Tuesday, July 08, 2008

Christmas in July: Final Report

Laura, our trusty financial coordinator, and I have just closed the books on the Christmas in July Fundraising Effort to keep Bishop Gene safe while at Lambeth.

Thanks to you, I can report that the grand total sent to Bishop Gene's fund was:


$7,080.84!!!!


I will be mailing your personal notes to Bishop Gene this week. I will also be mailing personal thank you's to each and every one of you who made a contribution.

Thank you - each and every one of you!

EWC Board: Press Release


FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
EWC Board applauds CofE vote


The Episcopal Women’s Caucus (EWC) Board applauds the Church of England Synod’s vote on July 7 to “affirm that the wish of its majority is for women to be admitted to the episcopate” and to prepare by February 2009 a first draft of a “national code of practice” outlining how this will be accomplished.

“The Caucus is celebrating this great news,” said EWC President Elizabeth Kaeton. “The Church of England ‘allows’ women to be ordained to the diaconate, and for the past 15 years the C of E has ‘allowed’ us be ordained to the priesthood. But women have not been ‘allowed’ to be appointed bishops, keeping the stained glass ceiling firmly in place.”

Bishops are appointed in the Church of England, not elected in a diocese by clergy and laity as they are in The Episcopal Church.

Kaeton and EWC board members are cautiously optimistic as the Church of England moves forward, including discerning how to “accommodate” those who will not support the episcopacy of women. “While it is important to make room for the multitude of voices in the Church, it is vital to maintain the authority of the office without regard to the person holding the office,” Kaeton said. “Any accommodation must not be used to legislate sexism.”

The EWC will continue to work for the Gospel values of equality and liberation and committed to the incarnation of God's unconditional love --- including and especially in the Church, said Kaeton.

“Women and men who have heard the liberation promised in the gospel of Jesus Christ, and who understand ourselves worthy, through Christ, to stand before God as children of God, will work together to continue to crumble the ideology of patriarchy and the system of sexism,” she said.

Quote of the Day



From my friend, Bob, on the peculiarities of being British:


If a gadget is broken in England, you don't fix it. You do your duty and make the best of the broken gadget, and pass it on to the next generation as a tradition.

Monday, July 07, 2008

The CofE Synod Motion


After a 15 year labor, the CofE Synod finally, FINALLY approved the appointment of women to the episcopacy.

The Final Approved Motion
:

That this Synod:

(a) affirm that the wish of its majority is for women to be admitted to the episcopate;

(b) affirm its view that special arrangements be available, within the existing structures of the Church of England, for those who as a matter of theological conviction will not be able to receive the ministry of women as bishops or priests;

(c) affirm that these should be contained in a statutory national code of practice to which all concerned would be required to have regard; and

(d) instruct the legislative drafting group, in consultation with the House of Bishops, to complete its work accordingly, including preparing the first draft of a code of practice, so that the Business Committee can include first consideration of the draft legislation in the agenda for the February 2009 group of sessions.’

The voting was:

Bishops: 28 for 12 against 1 abs

Clergy: 124 for 44 against 4 abs

Laity: 111 for 68 against 2 abs

And now, in some parts of The Anglican Communion, there will be great wailing and gnashing of teeth. It will be proclaimed "a dark day in the history of the CofE." Others will say it is the "end of the world as we now know it."

There will not be Peace in the Valley this night. The paradigm of power has shifted once again.

There will be great rejoicing from the mountain tops this night. The stained glass ceiling has finally been broken for women in another church.

Of course, it remains to be seen just how long it takes for the code of practice (read: "accommodations") to be made for those who have strong theological objection to the ecclesiastical authority of women who are bishops.

The task will be to provide a code of practice that will neither be insulting to women or those who oppose women who are bishops, while still maintaining the authority of the office, no matter what person occupies it.

And, as former Archbishop of Canterbury, William Temple once said, "When we choose wisely, God reigns; when we choose foolishly, God reigns."

I believe the CofE made the wise choice. Others obviously disagree with me. And, either way, God reigns.

A press release from the Episcopal Women's Caucus will be forthcoming.

Okay, I've shown just about enough restraint as I can possibly muster. Can I just say:

WOO HOO!!


Results of vote at Ruth Gledhill's Blog http://timescolumns.typepad.com/gledhill/2008/07/women-bishops-t.html#more

"All the world's a stage . . .


. . . and all this day, we've have front row center to the drama in the Church of England, meeting in Synod, to determine whether or not women can be ordained to the episcopacy."

First of all, I want to be clear that these remarks are my own on my own personal blog. I am not speaking in my official capacity as President of the Episcopal Women’s Caucus.

It’s not that I suspect my sisters and brothers on the board would disagree with me. It’s just that we haven’t had a chance, just yet, to discuss it as a community of leaders. We’ll do that later this evening in our monthly Board Conference Call.

I have been closely following the Church of England Synod debate over the ‘election’ of women to the episcopacy.

They have already agreed with the idea of women bishops.

Now, they are to vote on how to “accommodate” the minority who do not accept the idea or the presence of women in the episcopacy. By the time this is posted, the final vote may have already been taken.

Ruth Gledhill has been ‘live blogging’ here.

Thinking Anglicans is also updating here.

I know. You thought that was a done deal. Yes, they do ‘allow’ women to be ordained to the diaconate. Yes, for the past 15 years women have been ‘allowed’ to be ordained to the priesthood. But, for the past 15 years, women have not been allowed, in the Church of England, to be ‘appointed’ bishops.

Yes, that’s right. One is ‘appointed’ to the episcopacy in England, not elected in a diocese by clergy and laity as is our custom in The Episcopal Church. Which may be part of the problem.

No. Check that. Here’s the problem. It’s as old as the story of the Adam and Eve. It’s the ‘original sin’ of Paradise: sexism. You know: It's all Eve's fault.

It’s no surprise to me that the two issues confronting the church are the ordination of LGBT people and the last crack in the stained glass ceiling for women. Suzanne Pharr wrote about it in 1988 in her book, “Homophobia: A Weapon of Sexism.”

Yes, you got that right. 1988. I discovered it shortly after I got home from the last Lambeth Conference in 1998 where eleven bishops who are women were in attendance.

I have a very clear memory of the day that Lambeth Resolution which said that homosexuality was incompatible with scripture. The coalition of conservative American bishops and their Global South partners emerged from the meeting hall shouting, “V-I-C-T-O-R-Y”.

It was like being at a tail-gate party. The testosterone level was that high.

The American progressive bishops emerged looking like Bambi-in-the-headlights. I remember Martin Smith, then head of the Society of St. John the Evangelist (SSJE) who attended there with Bishop Tom Shaw (as both men were celibate monks, Martin joked that he was Tom’s “his most chaste spouse”), said that the images from Lambeth were, for him, like undeveloped film that would need to spend some time being soaked in baptismal water before any clarity emerged.

It’s hasn’t been that long since the entire process of picture-taking has been revolutionized by the technology of computer digitalization, but I think we used to call undeveloped film “negatives.” Right.

It didn’t take long for the negatives to emerge with greater clarity than anyone expected.

The very next day, the good bishops and primates came after women, passing a resolution which stated, “there is and should be no compulsion on any bishop in matters concerning the ordination or licensing” of women.

The resolution, entitled, “Unity of the Anglican Communion” was hammered out in private meetings between some women bishops and traditionalists and passed by 80%.

I know. It broke my heart when it didn’t blow my mind. And, it went downhill from there. I don’t know who wrote the prayer, but I remember praying the part about “help us from oppressing others or from participating in our own oppression.”

Suzanne Pharr defines patriarchy as “an enforced belief in male dominance and control”. She says patriarchy is the ideology and sexism the system that holds it in place.

Pharr further states: “The catechism goes like this:

Q: Who do gender roles serve?
A: Men and the women who seek power from them.

Q: Who suffers from gender roles?
A: Women most completely and men in part.

Q; How are gender roles maintained?
A: By the weapons of sexism: economics, violence and homophobia.”

Most of this catechism was written in the crucible of domestic violence where these three weapons were seen most clearly.

Pharr writes: “The stories of women battered by men, victims of sexism at its worst, show these three forces converging again and again.

"When battered women tell why they stayed with a batterer or why they returned to a batterer, over and over they say it was because they could not support themselves and their children financially, they had no skills for jobs, they could not get housing, transportation, medical care for their children.

And how were they kept controlled? Through violence and threats of violence, both physical and verbal, so that they feared for their lives and the lives of their children and doubted their own abilities and self worth.

And why were they beaten? Because they were not good enough, were not “real women,” were dykes, or because they stood up to him as no “real woman” would. And the male batterer, with social backing, felt justified, often righteous, in his behavior – for his part in keeping women in their place.”

I won’t go into economics and violence here, but I do want to speak to the issue of homophobia, which is most effective because it is always accompanied by the strong arm of heterosexism - the assumption that the world is and must be heterosexual and its display of power and privilege as the norm.

There was a time when the two most condemning accusations made against a woman to dis-empower or silence her were “whore” and “lesbian.”

The sexual revolution may have altered the former, but the later, the word ‘lesbian,’ still strikes fear even in the hearts of women whose sexual orientation is toward another women.

It is still, in many ways, “the love that dares not speak its name.”

To be a lesbian is to be perceived as someone who has stepped out of line. It is to be a woman who has moved out of the social/economic context of dependency on a male, a woman who is woman-identified.

Because a lesbian is a person who is perceived to be able to live without a man for economic, societal, and sexual satisfaction or fulfillment, she is therefore perceived (however illogically) to be against men.

Pharr says that a lesbian “is perceived as someone who has no societal institutions to protect her and is not privileged to the protection of individual males. Many heterosexual women see her as someone who stands in contradiction to the sacrifices they have made to conform to compulsory heterosexuality.

"A lesbian is perceived as a threat to the nuclear family, to male dominance and control, to the very heart of sexism.”

Gay men are also perceived as a threat to male dominance and control, and the homophobia expressed against them has the same roots in sexism as does homophobia against lesbians.

Visible gay men are the objects of extreme hatred and fear by heterosexual men because they are seen first, as Pharr says, as “betrayers, as breaking ranks with their male heterosexual solidarity and must be punished and eliminated. “

There’s also the “ick” factor – a repulsion of the image of anal sex wherein one man is the “passive recipient” – read: woman. When you factor in the Victorian notion of ‘the pleasure principle’ – that women are designed to have sex only to bear children, not enjoy the act of sex – you begin to understand just how “icky” the ick factor is for many men.

I strongly recommend Pharr’s book to you, if you haven’t already read it. It’s an important work and reads well, even ten years later. That probably speaks more to how little progress we’ve made in the last decade than anything else.

Oh yes, we have a woman Presiding Bishop and Primate. Oh yes, we had a strong, viable woman candidate for the Democratic Presidential Nomination. Yes, we’ve come a long way, in many ways.

And, as Flo Kennedy used to say, “If we really had come a long way, nobody would be calling us baby.”

Here’s the thing – the truly amazing thing: These two issues – sexism and homophobia/heterosexism – are being discussed in the church, right out in the open, in front of God and everyone.

Oh, I know. The British Synod thinks it’s talking about ecclesiology and theology. These good Christian folk think they are saving the church or preserving the unity of the church. And, God knows, we do wish to accommodate. Accommodation is a cornerstone of classical Anglicanism.

But, if you listen, just underneath all the God-talk and the invocation of the name of Jesus, you can hear it. Loud and clear. All the way from across the pond. It’s the crucial conversation which May Sarton says you can always hear just under the banter of polite social conversation.

That’s not the sound of London Bridge falling down. It’s not even the sound of the sky falling, Chicken Little. What you hear is the crumbling of the last two cornerstones of patriarchy: sexism and homophobia.

Oh, they have not gone away completely. They surely won’t in my lifetime. Indeed, they are going on in a little Roman Catholic Church in St. Louis, MO where a nun who supports the ordination of women has been effectively excommunicated and a male on the staff as terminated his position so that he may speak truth to power.

We have a long way to go, baby.

But, liberation, true liberation, never comes from the work of a few people at the top. Gandhi did not liberate his people by the strength of his individual will. Neither did Martin Luther King, Jr. further the liberation of his people in isolation.

Liberation comes when large groups of oppressed people come to believe that they deserve liberation and then work in order to achieve it. The Synod of the Church of England will not liberate women that they may pursue the fullness of their vocation in the church of their baptism. Neither will the Church of Rome continue to suppress her people forever.

Women and men who have heard the liberation promised in the gospel of Jesus Christ, and who understand ourselves worthy, through Christ, to stand before God as children of God, will work together to continue to crumble the ideology of patriarchy and the system of sexism.

That’s not the question. The question, as the Archbishop of Canterbury himself preached just yesterday, is “Where would Jesus be? Jesus is going to be . . : with those traditionalists feeling the Church is slipping away from them, . . .. He’ll be with those . . . who feel that things are closing in, that their position is under threat, that their liberties are being taken away by those anxious and eager to enforce new ideologies in the name of Christ. He would be with those who feel that their liberty of questioning is under threat, he would be with the gay clergy, who wonder what their future is in a Church so anxious and tormented about this issue.”

If you are wondering where to find Jesus, just look for him. He’ll be the one, standing near the wall, listening to the sound of the crumbling of oppressive systems.

And, ready to love and care for us all.

Meanwhile, the human drama in the Anglican Communion will continue. In the First Act, the super-duper uber orthodox Anglicans moved from schism to 'realignment.' In the second act, the Church of England tries to figure out how to 'accommodate' those who do not wish the episcopacy of women while preserving the authority of the office.

Pull up a chair. The third act "The Lambeth Conference" is about begin.

Notes in case the above links don't work:

Ruth Gledhill: http://timescolumns.typepad.com/gledhill/2008/07/women-bishops-t.html

Thinking Anglicans: http://www.thinkinganglicans.org.uk/archives/003225.html

Breaking news from NCR: St. Louis Parish Hit Again

Note: I trust that NCR (National Catholic Reporter) will keep us fully informed when Sean Collins begins to "talk truth to power." Please remember to sign the petition for Sr. Louise HERE

Photo by Jim Tobin

Beleaguered St. Louis parish hit again
By Tom Fox, NCR Staff
Published:
July 7, 2008

Beleaguered St. Cronan parish in St. Louis, Mo., from which Sister of Charity Louise Lears was banished last month as a pastoral associate for her support of women’s ordination, has been hit again by the resignation of its pastoral associate, Sean Collins.

Collins announced his decision to end his parish work in a letter dated July 2nd to the St. Cronan parish council.

“I believe in the days ahead my calling is to continue our common work of praying for peace and trying to make real in the city of St. Louis the Reign of God,” Collins wrote. “I have come to the conclusion that I will be hampered in that calling, personally, if I remain an employee of a parish in the archdiocese.”

The tumultuous events at St. Cronan, an inner city Saint Louis parish, began June 26 when then St. Louis Archbishop Raymond Burke issued punishing delicts against Lears for having actively supported women’s ordination efforts in the archdiocese.

The next day Burke was named prefect of the Apostolic Signatura, the highest church court at the Vatican.

Burke edicts forbid Lears from taking part in any archdiocesan church ministries. He also forbid her from participating in sacraments within the archdiocese.

St. Cronan has now lost both its pastoral associates in one week’s time.

Collins told NCR that leaving his official post will allow him to speak freely about Lears’ case and wider conduct of life in the archdiocese.

“I need to be able to talk freely about Archbishop Burke's treatment of our sister Louise and our faith community,” he said.

“We sought dialogue with him (Burke) repeatedly and our repeated invitations were either ignored or rebuffed,” Collins said. “Now that the canonical penalties of Louise have been decreed, I could no longer hold back my criticism in a public forum.”

Ruth Hassler, a designated spokesperson for the parish, said that Collins’ resignation has been met within the parish by “shock and grief.”

“Many of us are reeling from being hit with another significant loss so soon after losing Louise from the pastoral team,” she said. “Those of us who know Sean a little better are not surprised at his resignation, so much as we are taken off guard by the timing of it.”

Hassler said people “respect his choice, especially those of us who currently work for or have recently worked for Catholic institutions within the archdiocese.”

“As a matter of integrity, it appears to be the best choice he could make. But understanding that choice doesn't shelter us from the grief of the loss,” she said.

Hassler described Collins as a “strong, gentle, intelligent, passionate, and deeply prayerful leader.”

Collins has had leadership roles in the parish for the past six years.

Until last week the St. Cronan leadership team included Father Gerry Kleba, the pastor, as well as Lears and Collins, the co-pastoral associates. Parish members say they referred to all three as “co-pastors.”

The 250-household parish has had a reputation for being socially engaged in the local neighborhood. The parish operates a food pantry and through a local chapter of St. Vincent de Paul, helps locals with utility bills, household goods, and house repairs.

The parish also operates a garden on a former vacant lot and this summer is involved in the construction of two Habitat for Humanity houses.

Parishioners told NCR that during winter months the parish organizes outreach to people living on the streets, staffing nightly teams to check on people weathering the cold outdoors.

St. Cronan is located in the center of St. Louis. The parish membership dwindled in the 1960s and early 1970s as its largely white working class population left. Pockets of elderly remained as the parish elementary school closed.

In the late 1970s, a revival of sorts began as small groups of former college students moved into the neighborhood. The arrival of a new pastor in 1981 added to the momentum. It has been a hub of inner city Catholic activity since.

Collins says his plans now are to join with a group of people -- some former Cronan parishioners and others -- to investigate what “being church” might mean in the months ahead. “What form that takes, I'm not sure,” he said. “But I am sure excited to find out.”

Fox can be contacted at tfox@ncronline.org

DON'T FORGET TO SIGN THE PETITION IN SUPPORT OF SR. LOUISE HERE

Update: July 6th Liturgy


Well, I was a wee bit nervous, but "A Service of Lessons and Patriotic Hymns for A National Holiday", with Eucharist (of course) was an unconditional success yesterday.

Some of you know that I was inspired to put it together based on the work of one of our creative, talented brothers, Ernest Cockrell, who has been a long time deputy to General Convention from the diocese of El Camino Real.

This service was really born out of my intense discomfort in singing Patriotic Hymns in church and yet a desire to be pastoral to those for whom these hymns have deep, personal, spiritual meaning. (Remember, I live in what is lovingly referred to as "Republicanville" and "Mayberry USA.").

Additionally, as one who considers herself Anglo-Catholic, I also have an inherent dislike for celebrating and observing civic or secular holidays in church.

Then, there's this thing about separation of church and state. Well, it's an odd thing, isn't it? I mean, our nation came into being from the spark of the desire for 'religious freedom' and many of the framers of the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution were also good CofE men who also framed the Constitution and Canons of TEC.

And, don't get me started about the role of clergy in marriage.

Woe is me, but I have this old fashioned idea about liturgy not being about me but about the priest being a servant to "the work of the people." The balance comes in trying to maintain the integrity of both when there are differences about the exact nature of "the work." You know. Like being an Anglican.

I must tell you that, singing those hymns in the context of the time they were written made all the difference for me. Yes, I still squirmed at the militaristic imagery, but singing about them immediately after hearing part of an historical document read or the voice of one who was alive at that time made it tolerable because it was more understandable.

Hearing Abigail Adams speak about the rights of women, and Chief Seattle speak about his understanding of the communion of saints vis a vis the land which he was being forced to "sell" to the government was very powerful. Indeed, there were several audible gasps from the congregation during those readings.

However, by the time we got to hearing Dr. King speak about being a "creative extremist" from his cell at the Birmingham Jail and then sang, "We Shall Overcome" - well, there wasn't a dry eye in the house.

It isn't noted there, but after the reading of the gospel and before the final prayer, I gave a very brief "homelette" about "a more perfect union" and how our union is perfected by the act of confession and repentance, forgiveness of sins and true amendment of life. This, to me, is why we have this kind of service in church - to pray for and participate in "a more perfect union."

I might tinker a bit with some things next year, but the response from the congregation was overwhelmingly positive.

I offer it to you as a consideration for your service next year as a "liturgy that works." Thanks to all of you who commented and helped to improve it in its first incarnation.

You can find it here.

Sunday, July 06, 2008

The Independent (UK) Rowan Stands Tall . . .


. . . at long last!!!

By Jonathan Wynne-Jones

It was a little after half past ten when the Archbishop of Canterbury shuffled up the steps of the pulpit in York Minster to address the hushed congregation.

After six years in the post, this could well become a defining moment for Dr Rowan Williams - the time when the real Archbishop appeared before his Church.

He has been weighed down by the crises that have engulfed the Anglican communion virtually ever since his arrival at Lambeth - pulled this way and that by the warring factions in the battles over homosexuality and women bishops.

Today, however, he grew in stature as the sermon went on, emerging by the end of it as the leader that the Anglican communion so desperately needs - compassionate yet direct and vulnerable yet firm.

Referring to the story of Joseph being thrown down into a waterless pit and left for dead by his brothers, the archbishop attempted to reach out to all those, in and outside the Church, who feel deserted.

In a sermon charged with emotion and feeling, but delivered with poise and unflinching stoicism, he set out his inclusive, all embracing vision for the Church.

"What would Jesus do is a good question to ask," he said. "Where would Jesus be is just as good.

"Who would Jesus be with? He is going to be with those who feel the waterlessness of their position.

"With those traditionalists feeling the Church is falling away from them.

"He will be with those in a very different part of the landscape who feel that things are closing in, that their position is under threat, that their liberties are being taken away by those anxious and eager to enforce their ideologies in the name of Christ."

There has been much grandstanding and posturing, talk of defection and challenges to the archbishop's leadership, but in a couple of sentences he rose above all of that.

He was reassuring the traditionalists opposed to women bishops that they would not be isolated and offering his support to those who feel threatened by fundamentalism on both sides of the different debates.

But he went further: "He will be with the gay clergy who wonder what their future is in a Church so anxious and tormented about this issue."

It is a shame that extending support to homosexuals in the Church should be a bold move, but it was and the Minster's congregation knew that; particularly considering that conservative Anglicans have just formed a rival church in response to the liberal attitude of the Western churches on the issue.

However, Dr Williams is not going to be cowed anymore into trying to appease everyone. That was what came across from his sermon.

He has done his best to keep everyone within the Anglican fold since he was made Archbishop, but now he is going to say what he thinks. And what he feels.

The Church shouldn't be just about issues, but about people, he seemed to say.

In what many read as a poignant tribute to his best man, a journalist who recently committed suicide, he made this case powerfully.

"He [Jesus] will be with those people in the press gallery who are trying to keep their minds on their business while dealing with any number of complex personal issues, who may be afflicted by private anxieties, grief, and losses that will never be noticed by those who take them for granted as they go about their business."

By the end of his sermon many of the congregation were close to tears. Others were celebrating that the archbishop seemed like a man transformed.

Yesterday, the Archbishop of York, Dr John Sentamu, rallied to the defence of his friend and colleague, saying that the "ungracious" attacks by conservative Anglicans on Dr Williams had "grieved" him deeply.

He was offering him a hand to climb out of the "waterless pit" that his Anglican "brothers" have put him in.

Today, the Church saw a leader, who seemed freed and who is now standing tall.

Rowan Williams stands tall.

Telegraph.co.uk, United Kingdom -

Friday, July 04, 2008

Take Action for Sr. Louise Lears

NOTE: Please head on over NOW and sign the petition for Sr. Louise Lears who was excommunicated for her support of the ordination of women. Any woman who is ordained in Christ's one, holy, catholic and apostolic church is not complete until every woman who is duly called to ordained ministry has the opportunity to fulfill her true and authentic vocation.

Target: Pope Benedict XVI, The Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, and Most Rev. Raymond Burke, Prefect Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura
Sponsored by: Women's Ordination Conference

On Thursday, June 26, Archbishop Raymond Burke imposed penalities on Sister Louise Lears, Sister of Charity, for her support of women's full equality and justice in the Roman Catholic Church.

After six months of proceedings, the decree was issued the day before Pope Benedict XVI appointed Archbishop Burke to head the highest court in the Catholic Church, as the Prefect of the Apostolic Signatura in Rome.

Archbishop Burke of St. Louis imposed two penalties on Sister Lears, 1) the penalty of interdict, which means that she cannot participate in public worship in a ministerial capacity and cannot receive the Sacraments and 2) the penalty of prohibition from reception of a mission anywhere in the Archdiocese of St. Louis, which means she can no longer serve in her positions as a member of the Pastoral Team at St. Cronan's Catholic Church and as the Coordinator of Religious Education.

We the undersigned believe the penalties callously imposed on Sister Louise Lears-a Sister of Charity who has dedicated her life in service of the Catholic Church-is a prime example of the way women are often wrongly treated by the hierarchy in the Roman Catholic Church.

We support Sister Louise Lears in her life and ministry in the Church. We oppose these penalties as way of dealing with differences and dissent. Such misuse of Church discipline will not extinguish the widespread call for women's equality nor intimidate women into accepting marginal status within the Church.

Sister Louise has the support of millions of Catholics who seek only the gospel promise of equality and we demand that these penalties be revoked as quickly as possible.

Thank you.

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/10/Take-Action-for-Sister-Louise.org

July 4: A 21 Rose Salute to 110 Women

No matter where you come down on the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, there is no debate about our country’s devotion and gratitude to the men and women who have lost their lives in service to America.

This Fourth of July, the Women on the Web takes a moment for a solemn salute to the ultimate wowOwow women: the 110 female soldiers who have lost their lives in the Iraq and Afghanistan conflicts. Our hearts go out to their families and friends, and we stand humbled by and proud of a nation and a culture able to produce daughters so brave and so honorable.

The number of fallen women in today’s conflicts outstrips the female death toll in the Korean, Vietnam and Desert Storm confilcts combined.

According to the Women in Military Service for America Memorial Foundation, eight women died in the line of duty in Vietnam and 16 died during Desert Storm in Kuwait.

Today, women make up 15 percent of America’s active duty forces and, as a result, the death toll among women soldiers has significantly climbed to where it stands today, July 2, 2008, at 110.

These are the true daughters of the American revolution, the revolution that has allowed women to shatter glass ceilings in all walks of life … even when the consequence is heartbreaking.

Links to wowOwow’s Fourth of July photo tributes to all 110 fallen female soldiers are listed. I found that looking into the faces of these s/heroes to be as inspiring as it was disturbing.

Please say a prayer for the 4,635 men and women who have died in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Hat tip to Marcia who directed me to this link.

Thursday, July 03, 2008

NCR: Sr. Louise Excommunicated

Published on National Catholic Reporter (http://ncronline3.org/drupal)
Community supports ousted St. Louis nun
By ncrdu1
Created 07/02/2008 - 21:31

By Tom Fox NCR Staff
Published:
July 2, 2008

Louise Lears (Photo by Jim Tobin)Louise Lears (Photo by Jim Tobin)Sister of Charity Louise Lears, forced out of all church ministerial roles by Saint Louis Archbishop Raymond Burke, is described by friends and colleagues in near saintly terms.

They call her a bright, energetic, compassionate and faith-filled woman. They see her as a creative, generous and selfless person, a highly effective parish minister. They say she is first rate teacher and preacher. They view her as a person guided by the gospels including an unwavering commitment to justice and the local poor.

These seemingly universal accolades, however, were not enough to save Lears from a severe interdict by Burke who banished her from all Saint Louis church ministries last week.

He also banned her from receiving any of the Sacraments in the archdiocese.

It was her belief that all church ministries, including women’s ordination, should be open to women. Curiously, this seems to have been only one of many of her passions and, perhaps, not her central passion, which seems to have been parish work.

Lears was shocked twice last week. First, she learned that Burke had judged her guilty of three grave canonical offenses against faith and church teachings; then, the next day, she learned that her accuser and judge he had been elevated to a new Vatican post, prefect of the church’s highest canonical court in Rome.

She was out; then so was he, at least from Saint Louis.

Lears, 58, for the past three years has been a member of the pastoral team at Saint Cronan’s parish in South St. Louis, and a coordinator of religious education in the archdiocese.

Lears is not speaking to the media, but issued as statement saying she was “deeply saddened” by the judgment.

“I love the church. I would never give scandal to the People of God. As a faith-filled woman, I root my life and ministry in scripture, Eucharist, and Jesus’ gospel message of nonviolence and justice. As a Sister of Charity, I vow my life to God with whom I walk in humility, simplicity, and charity."

While Lears’ primary identification is that of a member of the Saint Cronan pastoral team, she is or has recently been a member of a number of other organizations. She is past president of the board of the Center for Survivors of Torture and War Trauma in St. Louis, a board and finance committee member for the Family Care Health Centers in St. Louis, a member of Winter Outreach to Homeless there, also a member of the W’EARTH Housing Coalition, a coalition led by low-wealth women in the Forest Park Southeast neighborhood in St. Louis.

She is also an adjunct faculty member in the Department of Theological Studies at Saint Louis University specializing in medical ethics and spirituality nonviolence.

Mark Chmiel, also an adjunct professor in the department, had this to say about his colleague:

“Sister Louise Lears has made availability and accompaniment a way of life. I have seen how much thoughtful attention and encouragement she gives to her students at Saint Louis University in her popular course, Spirituality of Nonviolence. Several times our community in Saint Louis traveled to the annual School of Americas vigil in mid-November, and I was always touched by Louise's calm and compassionate presence over those long weekends.

She also participated in our direct-action efforts to raise awareness and provoke responsible action about the U.S. government use of torture in Iraq and at Guantanamo. In such wise, wherever she is, she continually nurtures a community of conscience as naturally as she breathes.”

Gina Meyer, a former student in Lears' class, Spirituality of Nonviolence, said, "The class completely reoriented my view of human relationships. We learned about Ghandi, Martin Luther King, Jr., Jesus of Nazareth, and many other peacemakers. Beyond that, though, Sister Louise showed us exercises and gave us challenges in our daily lives that made me realize how much my own language and behavior affect those around me.

Nonviolence is a true way of life and I learned if from Sr. Louise. She taught me how to be a more loving and peaceful Christian, and I am so happy that I was able to learn from her."

NCR contacted a number of her other colleagues who spoke with a mixture of outrage and mourning, anger at what they called the injustice of the action taken against Lears and sadness as they pondered the loss of her talents to the archdiocese.

Sister of Saint Joseph of Carondelet Jean Abbott recalled the time Lears arrived to help her set up a center to receive victims of torture coming from Guatemala. Abbott had found an old tavern, but it was Lears who imagined how it could be transformed into a vibrant center and set the wheels in motion. “I had very little money,” Abbott said. “Louise had an eye for organization. She brought the place to life.”

“She has a keen sense of justice,” Abbott said.

The Saint Cronan parish council last week seemed equally vexed and saddened. The council issued a statement criticizing Burke’s action while defending Lears' pastoral work “wholeheartedly.” “(We have) been edified by her depth of caring for the people of this parish, our children, the children of our neighbors, and the men and women who call the Forest Park Southeast neighborhood of St. Louis home.”

The statement added that Lears “has been a model of compassion and of non-violent resolution of conflict. She has encouraged us to live more fully the Gospel of Jesus. It saddens us deeply that she has been singled-out for prosecution in a church court.”

Echoing these expressions, Abbott said, “I feel tremendous compassion for Louise and I’m extremely sad for the church.”

Jerry King, a member of the parish and member of the Center for Theology and Social Analysis in Saint Louis, an organization he and Lears belong to, found irony in the Burke censure. “Louise was not spoiling for a fight; she really did not want a fight; she wanted resolution.” He said she just wanted to be a pastor – “and has been very good at it, very active in her commitments” to the parish, which he described as a “last stop” for people disaffected from the church.

King and others now worry the disaffected are now going to drop out altogether.
Ellen Rehg, another member of the parish, disagrees. She called Lears a “nonviolent saint” adding, “I don’t say that lightly.”

“She will continue to live nonviolently, maintaining her integrity. You know I’ve hardly ever heard of canon law until recently. She’s going to make it. So will we. She’s taught us to trust in the gospels.”

Copyright © The National Catholic Reporter Publishing Company
115 E. Armour Blvd., Kansas City, MO 64111
(TEL 1-816-531-0538 FAX 1-816-968-2268)
Send comments about this Web site to: webkeeper@natcath.org PRIVACY POLICY ADVERTISING POLICY
Source URL (retrieved on 07/04/2008 - 01:23): http://ncronline3.org/drupal/?q=node/1330

Goin' Gullah


I'm headed out to the beach - that would be Rehoboth, of course - to continue reading and cooling off (I'm halfway through Tolstoy's "Anna Karenina". Still Really Great after all these years. I hope to start "The Story of Edgar Sawtell" by David Wroblewski on Saturday).

The Fourth of July Festivities are anticipated to be a bit hampered by the prediction of rain, so we're all trying to get in our beach time today.

I have discovered "Gullah" cuisine - from the lowlands of South Carolina and Georgia - which is "home" (an odd term in this context) of the descendants of the slaves who were brought to this country from Ghana, West Africa.

I got this wonderful recipe for Spicy Shrimp and Creamy Grits from this restaurant, The River Room in Georgetown, South Carolina.

I've made it twice. It's to die for. Honest. I hope to make it again Saturday night for company.

The beauty of it is that you can get everything ready before your guests arrive, start cooking the grits, then start the shrimp, and in 20-25 minutes you are at the dinner table and enjoying a FABULOUS meal.

I am going to have to call them back for their recipe for Peach Cobbler. It was served hot and didn't even need Ice Cream. Yum. Yum.

GULLAH SPICY SHRIMP

INGREDIENTS:

* 4 slices bacon, diced
* 6 to 8 ounces sliced fresh mushrooms
* 1 1/2 pounds shrimp, peeled and cleaned
* 1/2 cup sliced green onions
* 1 tablespoon chopped fresh parsley
* 1 can (14 1/2 ounces) diced tomatoes
* 1/2 teaspoon Creole seasoning
* dash garlic powder
* 1/4 teaspoon ground black pepper
* salt, to taste
* dash ground cayenne pepper or Tabasco, optional

PREPARATION:

In a large skillet, cook bacon until cooked but not crisp; add mushrooms. Sauté mushrooms until just tender, adding a little oil or butter if needed; add shrimp and cook, stirring, for 1 minute. Add green onions and parsley; continue cooking for about 1 minute. Add tomatoes, Creole seasoning, and a dash of garlic powder. Bring to a boil and simmer for about 1 to 2 minutes, or until shrimp is cooked through and liquid has reduced and slightly thickened. Taste and add pepper, salt, and cayenne, to taste.
Serves 4.


CREAMY GRITS

INGREDIENTS:

* 1 cup heavy cream
* 1 can (1 2/3 cups) chicken broth
* 1 cup water
* 4 tablespoons butter
* 1/4 teaspoon salt
* 1/8 to 1/4 teaspoon pepper
* 1 cup quick grits

PREPARATION:

Bring heavy cream, chicken broth, and water to a boil in a medium saucepan. Add butter, salt, and pepper. Slowly whisk in grits and reduce heat. Cook 15 to 20 minutes over low heat, stirring frequently. Serve in place of rice with shrimp, pork tenderloin medallions, lamb chops, or other meat or poultry.
Serves 4 to 6.

Wednesday, July 02, 2008

"Things are going to get squirrely"

I remember that bit of warning-as-advice just before Lambeth 1998. At the time, I was working as the Canon Missioner for The Oasis in the Diocese of Newark.

At the time, Jack Spong was my bishop. That was his prediction about what we were about to experience across the pond.

He was absolutely right.

I won't rehearse all the 'squirrely' things that happened a decade ago. Truth be told, I still want to keep most of it in the dark, inner recesses of my memory.

Squirrely? Some of it was downright bizarre. Like, when an African bishop and his wife tried to lay hands on one high-profile LGBT activist to 'heal' him of his homosexuality while the print and electronic media from around the world caught the event on tape and film for posterity.

Squirrely? You betcha. And, that's not even the most bizarre of the stories. But, let's not go there right now. If I think about it too long, I just may lose my resolve to be at Lambeth in a few weeks.

We seem to be entering into the same sort of behavior. The recent GAFCON Conference in Jerusalem is certainly one dark and dismal example.

Initially highly triumphed by their own press releases and publications as the beginning of the formal 'schism' in the Anglican Communion, it ended with a dizzying spin of a term: 'realignment' - AWAY from Canterbury as the historic spiritual center of Anglicanism.

Excuse me? Schism by any other word would smell as sour.

Wikipedia says this about schism: ( /ˈsɪzəm/ or /ˈskɪzəm/), from the Greek σχίσμα, skhísma (from σχίζω, skhízō, "to tear, to split"), means a division or a split, usually in an organization or a movement. A schismatic is a person who creates or incites schism in an organization or who is a member of a splinter group. The word is most frequently and usefully used about a religious division that occurs with a religious body with a defined organisation and hierarchy.

Okay, so it's not "The Great Schism" of 1054 which 'realigned' the base of power between Western (Latin/Rome) and Eastern (Greek/Orthodox). Let's just name that tune "The Anglican Schism in Key Minor."

Indeed, in probably one of the most honest if not overly enthusiastic proclamations to come from the neo-Puritan, uber-Calvinistic blogs was this: "We have a new Province!"

Never mind that said 'novo province' has not yet been recognized by the Archbishop of Canterbury. If you recall, GAFCON also proclaimed that Canterbury was not the center of Anglicanism. Which leads one to believe that this particular proclamation is the function of one of three possibilities: naive optimism, incredible ignorance or blatant arrogance.

In this particular case, being as generous as I know how to be, I would say it's a combination of all three.

Schism? Realignment? I say, 'squirrely'.

It's also a clear indication to me that the Lambeth Conference will be nothing less than "The War of the Wor(l)ds."

The Archbishop of Canterbury has issued one of the strongest rebukes ever of the shenanigans of the so-called "orthodox" Right.

Oh, it's sugar coated in pleasantries and preceded by being all dressed up in the language of deference, but he asks a "very serious question" about a "non-geographical province": "how is a bishop or primate in another continent able to discriminate effectively between a genuine crisis of pastoral relationship and theological integrity, and a situation where there are underlying non-theological motivations at work?

Thanks be to God, "no foreign curia," one of the cornerstones of the Anglican Reformation, remains intact.

And, he says, "I believe that it is wrong to assume we are now so far apart that all those outside the GAFCON network are simply proclaiming another gospel. This is not the case; it is not the experience of millions of faithful and biblically focused Anglicans in every province."

Clearly, this is a man who has been straining near the end of his rope.

While this has obviously not pleased some of the sisters and brothers of the "Not-Yet Novo Provence", whose comments begin to sound like a Pink-Floyd lyric ("We don't need no education. We don't need no thought-control. All in all it's just another brick in the wall."), they have at least treated him with a modicum of respect.

Not so with Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori, whom they refer to in such adolescent taunts as "The Presiding Squid," or "Presiding Pestilence." Here's the first sentence of her response to GAFCON:

"Much of the Anglican world must be lamenting the latest emission from GAFCON."

If you couldn't hear the rest of what she had to say, that's because the howling started at the eleventh word.

That's right: "emission."

I know. Can you believe it? I just checked one of the more nefarious "orthodox" blogs. As of this morning, there were 199 comments posted in reaction to her statement, most of them having to do with crude references to flatulence.

Never mind that the woman is a scientist with an earned doctorate and knows things about the scientific theorum of 'emission' and lots of other stuff these bozos haven't learned and no-doubt won't learn in their pathetic lifetimes. Never mind that she was commenting at all on an event which really ought to have been ignored. Never mind that her words were remarkably fair and balanced.

No, let's jump up and down on one word so we don't have to pay attention to the rest of what she has to say. Remember her very first sermon after being elected Presiding Bishop? Sweet Mother Jesus, they did the very same thing!

Ah, I can hear the comments of some of our Not-Yet-Novo Provence now: "She needs to get a copy editor! She should not say provocative things like that and not expect people to be upset!"

Cue Pink Floyd: "We don't need no education. We don't need no thought control."

One of those who commented, who describes himself as a 'progressive' (and some of his credentials would certainly lead one to agree), somehow found the antics of these clowns in this Schismatic Circus irresistible and joined in, adding - incredibly - that he thought the Presiding Bishop should apologize for the use of that word.

I would give a link to his blog, but I think that in a few more years, he's going to want to forget that he ever made that comment. The less people who know, the better for his reputation.

I don't pretend to understand all of this. I could offer Great Thoughts and Important Theories (and, you know I have them). All I can think of is one word:

Squirrely.

All in all, it's just another brick in the wall.